2016 Mid-Pricers

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Is the Salary Predictor on tooserious.net accurate?
Although in reality a players' score fluctuates quite a bit, it's interesting how much a player needs to score to actually increase in value.

Just looking at those mid-priced guys @ 350k it seems that even with an average of 90, they don't barely increase by 100k.
So you're really relying on 2-3 big 110-120 games close to each other to get their price up, without a 60 game inbetween.

So basically if you're taking a Sheridan or Lonergan they need to be scoring at keeper levels (90) for them to be worthwhile.
At an average of 80 they barely increase by 50k!

I think I'm over-thinking things now - just need the damn season to start!
 
nameless said:
Is the Salary Predictor on tooserious.net accurate?
Although in reality a players' score fluctuates quite a bit, it's interesting how much a player needs to score to actually increase in value.

Just looking at those mid-priced guys @ 350k it seems that even with an average of 90, they don't barely increase by 100k.
So you're really relying on 2-3 big 110-120 games close to each other to get their price up, without a 60 game inbetween.

So basically if you're taking a Sheridan or Lonergan they need to be scoring at keeper levels (90) for them to be worthwhile.
At an average of 80 they barely increase by 50k!

I think I'm over-thinking things now - just need the damn season to start!
Click to expand...
It's 95% accurate

Yeah I know what you mean. A player really needs to have a big score or 2 to increase in prise
 
nameless said:
So basically if you're taking a Sheridan or Lonergan they need to be scoring at keeper levels (90) for them to be worthwhile.
At an average of 80 they barely increase by 50k!
Click to expand...
And that's why they are a trap, you can't actually use them as stepping stones. They are keepers or overpriced underperformers. If they are not in your team at the end, they are generally a fail. Throw Libba, Crouch etc in there with that lot.
 
Deliverance said:
And that's why they are a trap, you can't actually use them as stepping stones. They are keepers or overpriced underperformers. If they are not in your team at the end, they are generally a fail. Throw Libba, Crouch etc in there with that lot.
Click to expand...
Barely enough rookies to cover if going GnR.
I'll happily pay unders for great output for guys like Libba/Crouch so I can get a good team balance and good overall points for the team. Then they can be used as stepping stones to other premos if don't cut it as keepers.
 
FAILTOSUCCEED said:
Barely enough rookies to cover if going GnR.
I'll happily pay unders for great output for guys like Libba/Crouch so I can get a good team balance and good overall points for the team. Then they can be used as stepping stones to other premos if don't cut it as keepers.
Click to expand...
G'n R is out the door for me until rookies are named, 3-4 teams on standby until then.
 
nameless said:
Is the Salary Predictor on tooserious.net accurate?
Although in reality a players' score fluctuates quite a bit, it's interesting how much a player needs to score to actually increase in value.

Just looking at those mid-priced guys @ 350k it seems that even with an average of 90, they don't barely increase by 100k.
So you're really relying on 2-3 big 110-120 games close to each other to get their price up, without a 60 game inbetween.

So basically if you're taking a Sheridan or Lonergan they need to be scoring at keeper levels (90) for them to be worthwhile.
At an average of 80 they barely increase by 50k!

I think I'm over-thinking things now - just need the damn season to start!
Click to expand...
A this here is why picking the right midpricer for a breakout year is nearly impossible.

Quite like TMac and Laird last year alot got on them early but not from the start.

Midpricers are trade eating traps. Proceed with caution.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Werewolf said:
What do you think of Sam Gray - obviously selected as a forward?
Click to expand...
He'll improve on last year and be a pod. Problem is a lot of these mid pricers are better suited to afl fantasy where you can make a bit of coin and upgrade as you have unlimited trades. In Sc you have to select the mid keepers. Or the huge improvers.
 
Werewolf said:
What do you think of Sam Gray - obviously selected as a forward?
Click to expand...

Job security for the moment is a lock in Ports best 22. Problem is he doesn't have huge runs on the board from previous years so that's all I'm worried about (as far as job security). If he plays the year he will average in the 90s- he will be an accumulating MID who is smart and uses the ball well.
 
Final update: Most popular $200k to $400k players as at 21 March 2016:

1. Liberatore (52%)
2. Wells (49%) on the rise
3. Weitering (38%) on the rise
4. Mills (36%) on the rise
5. Olilver (18%) on the rise
6. Aish (18%) on the nose
7. Parish (17%) on the nose
8. B.Crouch (16%)
9. De Goey (15%)
10. Simpkin (15%)
11. Seedsman (14%)
12. Lobbe (14%) on the nose
13. Menzel (13%)
14. M.Crouch (13%) on the rise
15. Crowley (13%) on the nose
16. Anderson (13%)
17. Leuenberger (12%)
18. Suckling (12%)
19. O'Meara (9%)
20. Sheridan (8%)

This could well be the year of the midpricer. Lots of popular selections within the $200k to $400k range.

It also appears that lots of supercoaches haven't refreshed their team for quite a while, given the popular selections of injured players like O'Meara. You'd expect that Thursday night could get a bit hectic when all of these folks attempt to log in simultaneously to change their team around. Hopefully the servers can handle the heat!

Bont2Boyd said:
Update: Most popular $200k to $400k players as at 15 March 2016:

1. Liberatore (53%)
2. Wells (44%) on the rise
3. Weitering (33%) on the rise
4. Mills (28%) on the rise
5. Parish (22%)
6. Aish (20%) on the nose
7. Lobbe (16%)
8. Simpkin (16%)
9. B.Crouch (15%)
10. Crowley (15%)
11. De Goey (14%)
12. D.Menzel (14%)
13. Anderson (14%)
14. Oliver (13%) on the rise
15. Seedsman (13%) on the rise
16. Leuenberger (12%)
17. O'Meara (12%)
18. Suckling (12%)
19. M.Crouch (11%) on the rise
20. Malceski (7%) on the nose
Click to expand...
 
Bont2Boyd said:
Final update: Most popular $200k to $400k players as at 21 March 2016:

1. Liberatore (52%)
2. Wells (49%) on the rise
3. Weitering (38%) on the rise
4. Mills (36%) on the rise
5. Olilver (18%) on the rise
6. Aish (18%) on the nose
7. Parish (17%) on the nose
8. B.Crouch (16%)
9. De Goey (15%)
10. Simpkin (15%)
11. Seedsman (14%)
12. Lobbe (14%) on the nose
13. Menzel (13%)
14. M.Crouch (13%) on the rise
15. Crowley (13%) on the nose
16. Anderson (13%)
17. Leuenberger (12%)
18. Suckling (12%)
19. O'Meara (9%)
20. Sheridan (8%)

This could well be the year of the midpricer. Lots of popular selections within the $200k to $400k range.

It also appears that lots of supercoaches haven't refreshed their team for quite a while, given the popular selections of injured players like O'Meara. You'd expect that Thursday night could get a bit hectic when all of these folks attempt to log in simultaneously to change their team around. Hopefully the servers can handle the heat!
Click to expand...

Thanks for these updates mate, they are great! JOM and Seedsman both really surprise me... B.Crouch is far more popular than I would have hoped.
 
Werewolf said:
What do you think of Sam Gray - obviously selected as a forward?
Click to expand...
The problem with Sam Gray (unlike Hall) is that he upped his price with some big games late last year when Port were out of the race for finals. He was put on the ball to see what he had. There was no Wines or Polec and his brother was shut down and left in the forward line waiting for the year to end.

With a fully fit team and a good run of early games, Port will look to capitalise and set up their season so he wont get the same opportunities. The only thing working in his favour is the interchange cap which lends itself to more TOG and midfield rotations.

So the big question is will he earn 5 mire touches oer game and push his average up to 90+? If he does he will become a keeper in your forward line, he will likely be a POD and will be in a team thats winning games during SC finals.

If he stagnates then you either hold onto him or waste a trade to sideways him to a breakout or bottomed out premo.

Halls story is exactly the same except he has a full time spot in the midfield for the first 8 weeks due to injuries.
Gray gained 2 midfielders as competition, Hall lost 2.

They are the same price.;)
 
nameless said:
Is the Salary Predictor on tooserious.net accurate?
Although in reality a players' score fluctuates quite a bit, it's interesting how much a player needs to score to actually increase in value.

Just looking at those mid-priced guys @ 350k it seems that even with an average of 90, they don't barely increase by 100k.
So you're really relying on 2-3 big 110-120 games close to each other to get their price up, without a 60 game inbetween.

So basically if you're taking a Sheridan or Lonergan they need to be scoring at keeper levels (90) for them to be worthwhile.
At an average of 80 they barely increase by 50k!

I think I'm over-thinking things now - just need the damn season to start!
Click to expand...

Ding ding ding ding!
 
Here2tellyouwhy said:
The problem with Sam Gray (unlike Hall) is that he upped his price with some big games late last year when Port were out of the race for finals. He was put on the ball to see what he had. There was no Wines or Polec and his brother was shut down and left in the forward line waiting for the year to end.

With a fully fit team and a good run of early games, Port will look to capitalise and set up their season so he wont get the same opportunities. The only thing working in his favour is the interchange cap which lends itself to more TOG and midfield rotations.

So the big question is will he earn 5 mire touches oer game and push his average up to 90+? If he does he will become a keeper in your forward line, he will likely be a POD and will be in a team thats winning games during SC finals.

If he stagnates then you either hold onto him or waste a trade to sideways him to a breakout or bottomed out premo.

Halls story is exactly the same except he has a full time spot in the midfield for the first 8 weeks due to injuries.
Gray gained 2 midfielders as competition, Hall lost 2.

They are the same price.;)
Click to expand...

Lol his brother (Robbie I presume you mean) was dominating in the middle at the end of the year!
 
Souup said:
One of the biggest overstatements I've read on here in the last couple of weeks. He's not even close to a must have.

Ablett and Rockliff are the closest things to a must have, but I wouldn't even consider them absolute must haves. Aaron Hall isn't even close.
Click to expand...

Hahahahaha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

A Bit Dusty
Strategy 2024 Midprice Madness
21 22 23 24 25
Replies
623
Views
37K
THE_GUN
THE_GUN
WaynesWorld19
Position 2024 Midfielders
42 43 44 45 46
Replies
1K
Views
73K
Lindsay_Gilbee
L
JuddgementDay
Strategy 2023 Midpricers Madness
31 32 33 34 35
Replies
867
Views
48K
Judd_Magic
Judd_Magic
WaynesWorld19
Position 2023 Midfielders
49 50 51 52 53
Replies
1K
Views
75K
evo
evo
gutsroy
  • Locked
Game Day 2023 Round 1 - SC Season Opener Preview - Let the Games Begin / Festival of the Midpricer
124 125 126 127 128
Replies
3K
Views
60K
SC fish
SC fish

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top