- Banned
- #5,326
The biggest surprise to me was giving Holmes a real gig. Does anyone actually believe he'll ever be our first ruck, unless we are crippled by injury ? Four spots on our list to dedicated rucks is one to many in my view. Especially as most teams are going down the path of only playing one ruckman with pinch hit support. With Hickey a lock and adequate backup in Longer and Pierce why clog our list with another ruckman ? If the prospect of losing three ruckmen to injury at the same time is a worry, why not rookie list a kid as number 4 just in case ? Delisting/trading Holmes and opening his spot up for another mid or defender would've made more sense to me.
Perfect cheap backup.
My only issue is while he is on the list we are not developing a young ruckman who could go past him?
In recent times there seems to be a trend to let other clubs develop them - then trade them in.