And you just know we’ll be all over this campaigner at 21 if he’s still there.
As we should be though.
List Mgmt. 2017 Trade/Draft/FA SuperMegaUltra Thread - Post Trade-Period Edition
- Thread starter dajesmac
- Start date
- Tagged users None
And you just know we’ll be all over this campaigner at 21 if he’s still there.
As we should be though.
Imagine the meltz if Carlton grab Clark and Kelly before us.
Monocle
And the rebuild begins.
- Sep 18, 2003
- 12,400
- 39,494
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Claremont NE Patriots Eagles AFLW
That would be a massive pass from me because Vickery is cooked............ if he was never half decent in the first place.
Agree to disagree because for me Vardy adds much more value to our future than Vickery.
Vickery is and always has been a big girls blouse.
Not to mention the whole he's probably going to jail thing.
You can't divide zero mate.
Edit: Maybe we can give her half of your BF posts? God knows we don't need them.
Monocle
And the rebuild begins.
- Sep 18, 2003
- 12,400
- 39,494
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Claremont NE Patriots Eagles AFLW
At 21 he would be a very good pick up.
Make no mistake The Grammar School Boy can play.
Clark a chance at 10 as is Constable as both can play half back.
Blues list manager said Docherty's injury wont effect the early pick but maybe the later couple aka 30 and or 79.
Not much left around 79 and they picked Mullet as a mature ager.
Think they will go a half back at 30 now and pass on Kelly. Knightmare mentioned Stoddart.
Good news for us. Kelly at 32.
You just know that we're going to end up with draft full of ****ing Hufflepuffs thoughI can easily see myself on draft night sitting there like Harry Potter with the sorting hat mumbling "not Allen" as the Eagles pick 13 comes around.
Accio mongrel, ammirite
Mickey Rae
Club Legend
- Sep 17, 2015
- 1,653
- 2,548
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- The Mighty Royals
Considering the amount of shit you have given to most on this board I seriously doubt that you would have any left for your missus to take.
donetts14
Rookie
- Nov 10, 2017
- 30
- 50
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Assuming Kelly drops that far, North at 23 scares me a bit. Would be a quality pick for them
- Nov 4, 2010
- 3,025
- 3,692
- AFL Club
- West Coast
God we really are a silver spoon club, but I guess that's how society at large works. I can handle the cringes as long as these toffs win us games.
Carbine Chaos
See My Chess
- Apr 1, 2009
- 65,670
- 99,959
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Perth FC, Everton, Delhi
Reckon Kelly would excel at half back if they started his AFL career there, though.
Would also justify my Andy McLeod comments.
- Jun 11, 2013
- 11,187
- 13,107
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Serves you right for getting married or living with her you silly bastard...
Alternatively, i believe if you set up a trust in another name (not your own) you can transfer all your belongings into the trusts name and then if she tries to take you for all your shit (which she will once her friends get in her ear), you can show that you dont own anything as everything is in the name of the trust of which you are a director only. I'm not sure whether you can just transfer your current stuff into the trusts name or you have to buy new shit under the trusts name though. Maybe the law students on here can clarify.
You have certainly nailed the pace issue but he is a LONG LONG LONG way from understanding how to play the game. With his pace, he would be a good wing/outside mid. Problem is he is catching up. If we draft him, do not expect him to play for min 3 years and more likely 4 years.
Thought Ds was taking the piss but then again after years of him saying Marsden, she might have just snapped.Serves you right for getting married or living with her you silly bastard...
Alternatively, i believe if you set up a trust in another name (not your own) you can transfer all your belongings into the trusts name and then if she tries to take you for all your shit (which she will once her friends get in her ear), you can show that you dont own anything as everything is in the name of the trust of which you are a director only. I'm not sure whether you can just transfer your current stuff into the trusts name or you have to buy new shit under the trusts name though. Maybe the law students on here can clarify.
- Thread starter
- #4,017
Anyone else expecting us to reach for some ****ing random player at pick 37? That's why I've been researching the bottom dregs of the draft, I'm anticipating some sort of left field stupid pick.
100%
It's funny how we look for the most obvious sliders at 32 and 37 for our dream/phantom drafts even though I can totally see us pulling someone out of nowhere
I still reckon we'll use it on Ryan
Galileo9
Premiership Player
Ah any donkey can come up with a rhetoric. I can see that you struggle with anything else.
liam123
Club Legend
- Sep 29, 2014
- 2,149
- 3,119
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Interesting. Thanks for the insights I didn't realise that that was his weakness. Just thought he didn't get a whole lot of the ball. Would an option be to give him a Daniel rioli type instruction " run and chase" and get him playing in the forward line? From what I can see he uses his pace to good effect in terms of running people down. Might not find much of the ball but has an impact when he does. I guess there may be better options if we want a best 22 player for 2018/2019
- Thread starter
- #4,023
Serves you right for getting married or living with her you silly bastard...
Alternatively, i believe if you set up a trust in another name (not your own) you can transfer all your belongings into the trusts name and then if she tries to take you for all your shit (which she will once her friends get in her ear), you can show that you dont own anything as everything is in the name of the trust of which you are a director only. I'm not sure whether you can just transfer your current stuff into the trusts name or you have to buy new shit under the trusts name though. Maybe the law students on here can clarify.
You're testing my memory here as I made every effort to drop everything I knew about trusts the day after that exam.
But I'm pretty certain you can't be all three of a) the settlor (DS), b) the trustee (holder and 'controller' of the trust property) and c) the sole beneficiary.
From memory a settlor of a discretionary trust (which this would be) must be independent and cannot be a trustee or beneficiary. Additionally, you can't be the sole trustee and sole beneficiary. But there are ways around all of that by having someone else act as the settlor and then having a company you own act as the trustee.
edit: But I have been practising outside Australia for 20 odd years, so take that with a pinch of salt.
- Thread starter
- #4,025
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
- Locked
- Poll
