Mega Thread 2018 Trade Period Discussion part 2! (cont. in Part 3 - link in OP)

What are we going to do??

  • 4 picks 21 and under? Back in Hamish!

    Votes: 74 67.9%
  • Trade up! We’re getting Lukosius / Rankine / Rozee!!!

    Votes: 35 32.1%

  • Total voters
    109
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
yea moved up to Brisbane for family reasons, now wants to move back for family reasons. the first time was understandable but the second time is BS
But this is the current belief of players ....that they can at anytime just up and leave a club, Contract is irrelevant

Next we'll have a Melbourne player going to the Gold Coast for a holiday and 12 months later come back to Melbourne :rolleyes: .....it is after all a reflection of society as well, we leave jobs to go overseas on holidays

So Hogan does go to Freo on a 8 year, $1M a year contract ....so what ! ...after 2 years he may well decide to come back to Melbourne on an even better deal .....there will be soon a line drawn in the sand by clubs !!
 
But this is the current belief of players ....that they can at anytime just up and leave a club, Contract is irrelevant

Next we'll have a Melbourne player going to the Gold Coast for a holiday and 12 months later come back to Melbourne :rolleyes: .....it is after all a reflection of society as well, we leave jobs to go overseas on holidays

So Hogan does go to Freo on a 8 year, $1M a year contract ....so what ! ...after 2 years he may well decide to come back to Melbourne on an even better deal .....there will be soon a line drawn in the sand by clubs !!

Contracts mean nothing anymore.

The AFLPA has ruined the AFL to some degree with player movement being so easy and the AFL are to blame for rolling over.

There has to be a rule in place that deters Clubs for going after players that are contracted. For starters I would like to see them forfeit a 1st rounder pick.
 
Disillusioned with where Adelaide we’re going and how they were going about it.
Also was in discussions with Sturt about their coaching role.
Oh !! .....but he's obviously happy with where the Gold Coast are going :rolleyes:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What do Port want for wingard? Would he play for us? Would pick 8 or 13 get it done? Hawks seem to be screwing him around and making him seem desperate and value drops imo.
 
You’d have to wonder why we are targeting Luko over Rankine if indeed that is the case?
Surely us being in the window, Rankine will help us first as well as being the bigger need, the more talented player (from what I read) and the more realistic chance to get him.

Because if you are aiming for instant improvement, you've already ****ed up by taking a first rounder to the draft.

We'd be targeting Luko as we believe he will be the better player in the long run.
 
Contracts mean nothing anymore.

The AFLPA has ruined the AFL to some degree with player movement being so easy and the AFL are to blame for rolling over.

There has to be a rule in place that deters Clubs for going after players that are contracted. For starters I would like to see them forfeit a 1st rounder pick.
It's not the AFLPA ...they support Contracts ..it's the weak clubs who are failing to enforce a Contract, yet want the ability to trade a player to a club, the player doesn't necessarily want to be at ...the hypocrisy of these two positions is amazing

IMO clubs that entice players to breach a Contract, should be liable to pay a % payout of that Contract, B4 entering into a fresh contract .....because of TPP restrictions, this will cause this habit to stop

But the AFL wants player movement, contracted or not .....so it's unlikely to introduce anything to protect clubs with contracted players
 
I cna just picture it now. A big showdown match, wingard snaps the winning goal for the crows from the pocket, puts his arms out and looks to the sky like he's a God,bananas being thrown at him from all angles from the classy not racist port fans.

Make it happen afc .

I know it's not about Port, and won't happen but gee, it would be good to see their "star youngster" move to us and play his best footy. I'm sure their fans would take it with the grace and elegance they are well known for lol.
 
What do Port want for wingard? Would he play for us? Would pick 8 or 13 get it done? Hawks seem to be screwing him around and making him seem desperate and value drops imo.
Wingard loves Adelaide the City .....if the Crows wanted Wingard, a deal would be done
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wingard loves Adelaide the City .....if the Crows wanted Wingard, a deal would be done
Then why the f aren't we doing it. We are just failing our due diligence by letting a player of his ability go somewhere else when players are doing all they can to leave the state.
 
Don't know how many times I have to post this...

Neale to Brisbane trade gets done for Pick 5. Freo will then use pick 5 for Hogan. Not sure who Freo is trying to kid with their bluffing??? Melbourne are desperate for May so they'll be using that pick 5 also to trade him in.


That leaves Gold Coast with picks 2, 3 & 5.

Adelaide use Himmelberg, picks 13 & 21 to get in picks 3 or 5, 30 & future 2nd/3rd round.

Adelaide also go to St Kilda with Atkins, picks 8 & 16 to get in pick 4, 28 & future 2nd/3rd round.

Can flip the picks offered to Gold Coast & St Kilda respectively to accommodate what they want.

Leaves Adelaide with picks 3 or 5, 4, 28 & 30 this year.

Gold Coast into the King twins, leaves the 2 SA jets at 4 & 5.

Get it done!
Why does Himmlebergs name keep getting thrown up?? We have been developing him for 3 or so years and he finally earns his spot in the team and looked very promising and people want to now move him on... he will be our future tall forward/back up ruck for many years.. could even be a 1st ruck if Sauce goes down injured. No way we are trading him.
 
I didn't say the Club lied ....i was generalising players and clubs do this too much & treat supporters as mushrooms
I'm a mushroom.

And even I can see hawks are screwing wingard and Port around. If we swoop in and just get a deal done I'm sure they would be happy. I don't know why we don't do it.

Incompetence?

Someone tell me what we would have to give Port to get him? What's Kelly's trade value since he wants out? Would pick 13 or 8 get it done? Crows need to swoop in and steal this deal.
 
Ah not pick 8 thank you - football isn’t a high priority on his radar. So no thanks.
So what would Port want, what are they expecting from hawks for him?

I think he would have a bit to prove if he got traded to his cross town rivals as well.
 
If hawthorn have managed to devalue Wingard for pick 13 then it's just a no brainer. 2 years ago you never would have gotten him for that .

Some would see it as bold. I would see it as pain stakingly obvious.
 
I've just heard the Peter Jackson ad, and while i'm not disagreeing, he just said Italian suits for $399, so they must have been the same price for ten years?
“Italian fabric” suits (made in Bangladesh)

What is going on at the Suns. Aaron Hall is worth a lot better than that. 2nd rounder. Time to close that club.
The Gold Coast board seem to think that he is toxic around the club and just want him out.
 
I'm a mushroom.

And even I can see hawks are screwing wingard and Port around. If we swoop in and just get a deal done I'm sure they would be happy. I don't know why we don't do it.

Incompetence?

Someone tell me what we would have to give Port to get him? What's Kelly's trade value since he wants out? Would pick 13 or 8 get it done? Crows need to swoop in and steal this deal.
#13 and #16 would still be better than what Hawthorn is offering for Wingard .....but I'm sensing there's no will by the Crows
 
So what would Port want, what are they expecting from hawks for him?

I think he would have a bit to prove if he got traded to his cross town rivals as well.
They are expecting much more than he is worth in this trade. They should not have burnt all their bridges with him.
 
Contracts mean nothing anymore.

The AFLPA has ruined the AFL to some degree with player movement being so easy and the AFL are to blame for rolling over.

There has to be a rule in place that deters Clubs for going after players that are contracted. For starters I would like to see them forfeit a 1st rounder pick.

If you are a club, you're in a much better situation to recieve at least a fair offer (if not good) if you're losing a contracted player.

So no. This is just following the trend in soccer where contracts are primarily about making sure the club gets good value if they lose a player.
 
Wasn't he despondent with coaching and going back to teaching ? ......wasn't that the excuse for leaving the Crows ?

Interesting that both McGovern and his Line Coach have both left the Crows :think: .....I don't believe in coincidences
I thought teaching was only a threat if we didn’t let him out of his contract?
So he’s leaving because of McGovern or McGovern left because of Francou?
To say stop with the lies you really need to know the reasons? Sounds like your guessing?
 
They discussed Peter Jackson yesterday .....it is his actual voice, but he died 10 years ago

Think the advert says Peter Jackson offering the best deals on suits ever ......must have been saying this same thing for a LONG TIME ....given he passed away 10 years ago :huh:

I've just heard the Peter Jackson ad, and while i'm not disagreeing, he just said Italian suits for $399, so they must have been the same price for ten years?

Peter Jackson (fashion designer) - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Jackson_(fashion_designer)Jackson died of prostate cancer at Knox Private Hospital in Wantirna, Melbourne on 1 August 2008

Just re-heard the ad

So either

(1) it's not his voice, or

(2) he's been selling Italian suits for the same price for 10 years
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top