Mega Thread 2018 Trade Period Discussion part 2! (cont. in Part 3 - link in OP)

What are we going to do??

  • 4 picks 21 and under? Back in Hamish!

    Votes: 74 67.9%
  • Trade up! We’re getting Lukosius / Rankine / Rozee!!!

    Votes: 35 32.1%

  • Total voters
    109
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Looks like we are trading pick 68 from gc acquired for our future 4th round for stengle. Paying overs as usual, has hardly played a game but deal looks done.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Surely Gold Coast would be better off saying 'get stuffed' to those offers for Hall and Scrimshaw and have disgruntled players rather than selling them for nothing
Maybe gold coast are offloading a heapof players quickly because they need to free up spots on their list to bring in a heap of young players.. because they are about to cash picks 2 and 3 in for four picks under 20 and other goodies like a himmelburg, cheney and or picks for next year...
 
We did a trade!


Oh... that's all?
I read 'GCS, trade pick, and Adelaide' and for a moment it made me so excited... Only to be replaced by;

t9MUtzM.gif
 
Maybe gold coast are offloading a heapof players quickly because they need to free up spots on their list to bring in a heap of young players.. because they are about to cash picks 2 and 3 in for four picks under 20 and other goodies like a himmelburg, cheney and or picks for next year...

Thats what I said. I agree but then why the f**k would do that last trade.

What a waste of time? Maybe Stengle pick.
 
That's what North paid for Hall.

Can't help but feel a little ripped off...

Aaron Hall sucks though, pick 68 is about right for him.

We're effectively paying a 2019 4th for Stengle, that's probably about right, could have been a 5th but really doesn't matter as we rarely use picks 60+
 
What is strange is that we already had pick 73.

Surely there is little to no difference between pick 68 and 73, so it seems strange to trade for 68 when we already had a pick of the same value already.

You would think that if Richmond accept 68 for Stengle that they also would have accepted 73 as it is pretty much the same value, seems a bizarre trade to me unless we're giving them both 68 and 73 to get the deal done.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Looks like we are trading pick 68 from gc acquired for our future 4th round for stengle. Paying overs as usual, has hardly played a game but deal looks done.

Is this satire?

Because if so it's genuinely funny.

If this is real, my goodness, imagine approaching the world like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top