Mega Thread 2018 Trade Period Discussion part 2! (cont. in Part 3 - link in OP)

What are we going to do??

  • 4 picks 21 and under? Back in Hamish!

    Votes: 74 67.9%
  • Trade up! We’re getting Lukosius / Rankine / Rozee!!!

    Votes: 35 32.1%

  • Total voters
    109
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone else think the whole trade period is like cycling match sprint? Nothing really happens for most of it and then a late flurry at the end.
Most of these deals are discussed throughout the year so why not just have 4 days


Exactly. I reckon 2 days should do it.

AFL will drag it out for more of a media spectacle though.
 
Wow. You are serious. You think a part time, junior reporter on the AFL media website, is actually employed by the league as some sort of actual expert?

Think you’ve outed yourself and your experience level in the process.

Anyway, before I stop wasting oxygen on you

1. You claimed all these journos and recruiters keep constantly talking about an elite 7.
2. When challenged, you found an old, single puff piece, from a low ranking, junior reporter.

Good one. Next time you’re caught making shit up, don’t keep digging

Here’s some more thoughts of your guru:

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2018/06...e-next-mature-age-recruit-successes-could-be/

Not a list that stacks up well, given the 5 free hits Carlton and GCS had

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2018/06/25/twomeys-first-round-afl-mock-draft/

Which includes the following passage:

“With many hyping this as one of the better drafts in recent years, Twomey told Future Stars he doesn’t quite believe it’s a ‘super draft’. It’s a really good first round, I don’t think it’s a super draft, but there’s some good names in there.”

Now run along and tidy up your room
Cmon sanders..i saw his post and it says who does he worm for..the AFL of course as most of these hack journo's do
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Interesting. If Scully can’t play a game in his first year at the Hawks, his salary is not included in their salary cap at all.

He is effectively free.
How does this work? All match payments?
 
They really could do with another best 22 after losing Polec and Wingard.

Would O'Brien be much more than depth?
What do you mean. Theyve lost Polec and Winguard and will most likely gain Lycett, Burton and Rozee who are all easily best 22.
 
Theory!

If GC were planning to trade 2 and 3 for our 8, 13, 16 and 21 would it not make sense for them to trade out this years fourth which they wouldn't use for next years when they probably would.
Would it not also make sense for Adelaide to bring in a fourth as they would have no picks from 3 until 80 odd after the Stengel trade.
Would it also not make sense for GC to turn May into Hombsch and Bayley Smith this year rather than pick 2 next year if they new they were trading 2 and 3 this year?
 
In all seriousness (and I say this as someone who endures major frustration with our club at the best of times) -even if you consider anything less than Lukosius or Rankine a trade/draft failure for the Adelaide Football Club, how can you make that judgment when the trading a failure when picks are up for grabs right up until draft night itself?

Better still - I stand by my comments that if there is ANY movement in the top 10 from any clubs it will now be kept under wraps and not announced until draft night itself to ‘build suspense’.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Theory!

If GC were planning to trade 2 and 3 for our 8, 13, 16 and 21 would it not make sense for them to trade out this years fourth which they wouldn't use for next years when they probably would.
Would it not also make sense for Adelaide to bring in a fourth as they would have no picks from 3 until 80 odd after the Stengel trade.
Would it also not make sense for GC to turn May into Hombsch and Bayley Smith this year rather than pick 2 next year if they new they were trading 2 and 3 this year?
Where did we get in a 4th?
We traded our 2019 4th for pick 68 this year?
Edit 68 is their 4th, didn’t we have pick 72 anyway?
 
This afl trade radio is so Victorian bias. They think port should trade 6 & 10 for pick 4. If I was a port supporter I would be so pissed with that trade. Giving away a top 10 to move up 2 spots.
 
Interesting. If Scully can’t play a game in his first year at the Hawks, his salary is not included in their salary cap at all.

He is effectively free.

I don't think that's true at all. If you are injured you are required to get match payments under the AFL CBA, which fall under the salary cap. And then your base salary would have to be included as it is with every player.

Scully's salary would only be not included in the cap if he agreed to a base salary which only comes into effect when he plays a game (which a player is unlikely to agree to), and even then he is required to receive match payments.

There is also no provision in the CBA for an injured player's payments to be excluded from the TPP (section 10b)
 
Theory!

If GC were planning to trade 2 and 3 for our 8, 13, 16 and 21 would it not make sense for them to trade out this years fourth which they wouldn't use for next years when they probably would.
Would it not also make sense for Adelaide to bring in a fourth as they would have no picks from 3 until 80 odd after the Stengel trade.
Would it also not make sense for GC to turn May into Hombsch and Bayley Smith this year rather than pick 2 next year if they new they were trading 2 and 3 this year?

2 and 3 for our 8, 13, 16 and 21 would be great. Perhaps a sweetener add Jake Kelly and Cheney. Maybe one of their later picks back as they will not use them.
 
This afl trade radio is so Victorian bias. They think port should trade 6 & 10 for pick 4. If I was a port supporter I would be so pissed with that trade. Giving away a top 10 to move up 2 spots.
Especially considering port have a reasonable chance of getting Rozee at 6.
It would be great for the saints as they’d probably still get max king at 6
 
Where did we get in a 4th?
We traded our 2019 4th for pick 68 this year?
Edit 68 is their 4th, didn’t we have pick 72 anyway?
Yes but we would had to use 72 for Stengel which would have left us with picks 2, 3 and 83.
This way if we plan to use 4 picks we have 72 instead of 101.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top