- Sep 28, 2016
- 10,133
- 20,418
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Definitely stuff, not so sure on things thoughI'm predicting some stuff gets happened today. Trades and shit and secret meetings about the draft and other stuff and things.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Definitely stuff, not so sure on things thoughI'm predicting some stuff gets happened today. Trades and shit and secret meetings about the draft and other stuff and things.
This afl trade radio is so Victorian bias. They think port should trade 6 & 10 for pick 4. If I was a port supporter I would be so pissed with that trade. Giving away a top 10 to move up 2 spots.
Most don’t pick up that high do they so 101 is more likely 80’s?Yes but we would had to use 72 for Stengel which would have left us with picks 2, 3 and 83.
This way if we plan to use 4 picks we have 72 instead of 101.
I didn't change a word. It's literally the post above yours. You're a waste of time. Can't admit you're wrong, internet troll. Ignored.
Hence why weve got Stengle and in particularly McAdam. Whilst Stengle isnt super quick he will add to the pressure.
McAdam will play R1
Yeah who knows. Just a theory that happens to fit some strange facts at the moment.2 and 3 for our 8, 13, 16 and 21 would be great. Perhaps a sweetener add Jake Kelly and Cheney. Maybe one of their later picks back as they will not use them.
I'm predicting some stuff gets happened today. Trades and shit and secret meetings about the draft and other stuff and things.
Don’t you just get as many picks as you need? Even if it’s a 7th rounder and pick 130
If they have a bad injury run next year....Exactly. Port have done well with the picks they could potentially have in this draft. But they have absolutely paid a high price and their depth, which was already not great, is looking a lot worse.
Im hearing that May is headed to Geelong.
True but this would still give us a better pick to use this year and helps GC. Both reasons to do it.Most don’t pick up that high do they so 101 is more likely 80’s?
What do you mean. Theyve lost Polec and Winguard and will most likely gain Lycett, Burton and Rozee who are all easily best 22.
I was just passing on what Mcclure and Dal Santo discussed.I don't think that's true at all. If you are injured you are required to get match payments under the AFL CBA, which fall under the salary cap. And then your base salary would have to be included as it is with every player.
Scully's salary would only be not included in the cap if he agreed to a base salary which only comes into effect when he plays a game (which a player is unlikely to agree to), and even then he is required to receive match payments.
There is also no provision in the CBA for an injured player's payments to be excluded from the TPP (section 10b)
No, not even they do.Excuse the ignorance, does anyone know what's involved in this potential "8 club mega deal" that Nick Dal Santo is going on about?
Excuse the ignorance, does anyone know what's involved in this potential "8 club mega deal" that Nick Dal Santo is going on about?
Excuse the ignorance, does anyone know what's involved in this potential "8 club mega deal" that Nick Dal Santo is going on about?
Cmon down adelaide... If the blues want a few picks... Actually nah... Id rather have a few picks.Carlton now making a last minute bid for Shiel?!?
Needs more clubs involved
Wouldn't have thought so.Does anyone think we will try and trade pick 21 and try and upgrade that to a pick in the lower teens?