Analysis 2019 List Management Discussion II

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I guess DeLuca could still end up a Rookie chance

It would be pretty stupid to delist a guy, then invite him to pre-season training without a 50/50 chance of being rookie listed

Perhaps they had to make room from the senior list to fit in a DFA or 2...that would make sense I guess


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Still got interest in Ben Keays?
Delisted today, though there was thought that he was heading GCFC way.
Keays lacks pace, so he's one worth having a look over, but they would have done that through NEAFL tape and scouting. I'd be hesitant, as this year was really his last chance to turn the corner.

How many senior list spots free do we currently have?
6 senior, 1 cat A rookie, 2 cat B rookie
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Keays lacks pace, so he's one worth having a look over, but they would have done that through NEAFL tape and scouting. I'd be hesitant, as this year was really his last chance to turn the corner.


6 senior, 1 cat A rookie, 2 cat B rookie
Think we might make one more senior change, depending on how many DFA's we recruit.
 
Papley went from being a good small forward to someone that would single-handedly determine the success of our club going forward.

Read the main board, seems we have gone from top 8 contenders to a club consigned to the bottom 4 who should sack SOS, all because we didn’t get papley
 
Where have you heard this?

I’m just using chronological reasoning:

1. We were linked to him in the media a little back prior to the trade period.

2. Our interest apparently subsided when all of the Papley media broke.

3. Papley deal breaks down, leaving us a small forward short of our plans.

4. Sam Gray was linked to us and St Kilda, and still remains unsigned.

5. Barass70 advises that Deluca is on shakey ground given we are pursuing Martin and Papley. We don’t get Papley ... yet we delist Deluca anyway.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I doubt it, they would have done it now.
If we get Martin in the PSD, and perhaps Newnes as a DFA, we're still taking #70 to the draft.
If it's just Newnes (and Martin), then I also doubt it, but I think we'd like to keep something up our sleeves just in case we trade into the draft on the night. I'd doubt we'd not utilise our pick in the early 60s.
 
Last edited:
Did you? Why so many?
I think I was at around 10.

I was pretty firm on Fasolo, Phillips, Lobbe, Kerr and Schumacher being gone, and recognised that most of Pickett, Garlett, Lang and LeBois would go, and that Simpson and Thomas were mulling over retirement.

I'm also yet to be sufficiently impressed by Goddard and Cottrell.
 
I think I was at around 10.

I was pretty firm on Fasolo, Phillips, Lobbe, Kerr and Schumacher being gone, and recognised that most of Pickett, Garlett, Lang and LeBois would go, and that Simpson and Thomas were mulling over retirement.

I'm also yet to be sufficiently impressed by Goddard and Cottrell.
Good call at RD10, but wouldn't have thought so at RD1 - that would have been harsh
 
I’m just using chronological reasoning:

1. We were linked to him in the media a little back prior to the trade period.

2. Our interest apparently subsided when all of the Papley media broke.

3. Papley deal breaks down, leaving us a small forward short of our plans.

4. Sam Gray was linked to us and St Kilda, and still remains unsigned.

5. Barass70 advises that Deluca is on shakey ground given we are pursuing Martin and Papley. We don’t get Papley ... yet we delist Deluca anyway.
FMD is your middle name Colombo??!!? 😂👍
 
I guess DeLuca could still end up a Rookie chance

It would be pretty stupid to delist a guy, then invite him to pre-season training without a 50/50 chance of being rookie listed

Perhaps they had to make room from the senior list to fit in a DFA or 2...that would make sense I guess


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
giphy.gif
 
Hi Dravid’s in,
Was just wondering for the record if you have found any definitive confirmation that pick 9 on it’s own with nothing coming back was officially offered for Papley ?
Cheers in advance ...

SOS was queried if #9 was on the table for Papley and responded with it was part of it. Doesn’t give much away.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top