Strategy 2021 Draft and Hypothetical pick trade proposals

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol seriously can we just have a ban on posting things ol clickbait Kornes says…

none of it is interesting and it’s all designed to just stir people up.

Hodgey wants a new rule! Hodgey gets a new rule.

No more clickbait shit from Cornes in here.


Also:
Can we also threadban Rendell quotes. The bloke is senile.
Done ✔️
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What if the gap is that big between Callaghan vs the rest?
On potential it's a massive gap imo. Highest ceiling in this draft is probably Callaghan. Not many players come along that size, that agility and balance who run a 6:10 2km and can find and use the footy. He has top 5 mid in the comp potential with his tools. But that's just it, it's only potential. Do you trade the farm for someone completely unproven who has only played a handful of NAB league games as an inside mid. Pretty massive gamble.
 
Just a huge risk… could be worth it but are we in a position to take that gamble?

Would you prefer one of Callaghan over say Ward + Sinn? We could swap our future first with the Bombers or Saints future second for pick 9 or 11? and grab Sinn with that pick… which would seem super risky but I’d probably prefer the combo of Ward and Sinn over just Callaghan for a similar trade.

I highlighted the Bombers and Saints because they will need a couple of first round picks if they are making a play for King next year
 
Last edited:
Rumour alert

Most recent post on the draft rumours thread is an interesting read. Richmond supporter has us trading 5 + future 1st for gws pick 2 + future 2nd. Apparently it's done but afl wants to keep it for draft night to keep it interesting.
Really don't like that trade. Callaghan's highlights are pretty special, but gee he f**ks around & runs himself into some trouble.

If we're giving up 2x 1sts, I'd much rather we target Freo's 6 + 8, instead of GilWS' 2.

Ward + Sinn > Callaghan
 
Really don't like that trade. Callaghan's highlights are pretty special, but gee he f**ks around & runs himself into some trouble.

If we're giving up 2x 1sts, I'd much rather we target Freo's 6 + 8, instead of GilWS' 2.

Ward + Sinn > Callaghan
Hear ya.. but you would have to add

Ward and Sinn vs Callaghan and whoever we could take with GWS 2022 Rnd 2 ...


I'd like if they put some of his stoppage work in those highlights. I've only ever seen him play on a wing
 
On potential it's a massive gap imo. Highest ceiling in this draft is probably Callaghan. Not many players come along that size, that agility and balance who run a 6:10 2km and can find and use the footy. He has top 5 mid in the comp potential with his tools. But that's just it, it's only potential. Do you trade the farm for someone completely unproven who has only played a handful of NAB league games as an inside mid. Pretty massive gamble.

You just said he has the potential to become a top 5 mid and that is the reason the club would be contemplating it. Every 18 year old Is a gamble trying to forecast what they might become in 5 years rather then if they can play season 1 . In terms of size and athleticism he is the prototype midfielder.

Just to use the point system if we gave up 5+6 for 2+26 as an example it's equivalent to pick 43 in gws favour, i hate using it but clubs would. Always ways to move back into the 1st round next year with 2nds offering 1 and a senior player , moving our future 1st there are ways . It's just a disaster if we are sitting 0-5 start of the season with no 1st round pick haha.
 
Really don't like that trade. Callaghan's highlights are pretty special, but gee he f**ks around & runs himself into some trouble.

If we're giving up 2x 1sts, I'd much rather we target Freo's 6 + 8, instead of GilWS' 2.

Ward + Sinn > Callaghan
Exactly. We can’t be giving up two first for an untried player.
 
If we can somehow get another pick inside the top 25 on draft night that would be the ideal result. What about trading our future second and future third round pick for a 2021 second round pick?
I imagine the dogs would be pretty happy to trade 23 for your future 2nd. Especially if you throw in pick 59.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Exactly. We can’t be giving up two first for an untried player.
Horrible trade and has the potential to be crippling in the same way Collingwood's trade with GWS last year has been for them. Even if Callaghan developed into the player he is speculated as being it won't solve all our issues, we need multiple elite young players in the next 2-3 drafts to get back to being a challenger. One player is not that cure all for our list holes. Give me Ward or Mac & a 2022 high first rounder any day of the week. Hopefully its just a Tiger supporter stirring the pot.... I don't think we're that dumb....I hope...
 
Get sinn or Johnson for a future first plus ward or Hobbs and I’d be pretty happy 😀
Each to their own but I wouldn't be handing over a possible future top 5 pick for guys that are borderline top 10 pick... I seem to be in the minority. Maybe Hawks climb the ladder but I'm not so sure.. I'd be looking to pick up future first round picks rather than trading them out.
 
West Coast are very keen on Erasmus they tried pretty hard this year to pull some strings and get him in their academy . Definitely one team I could see trying to move up.

West Coast are into Josh Sinn big time, he is their target, pretty sure they pick him up.
 
Last edited:
I imagine the dogs would be pretty happy to trade 23 for your future 2nd. Especially if you throw in pick 59.
Pretty sure 59 would get you enough points for a Darcy bid at pick 4 (after we trade up to 2, bid on Daicos then take Callaghan).

The question is if we can get a future first in the door for 21 on draft night.
 
The chances of a significant pick swap trade leaking to big footy but not the AFL media and actually being true would be .00001% so yes someone can post the Dumb and Dumber gif

Maybe but it's something to discuss at least for the next week and a half. Didn't you recently say north offered 20 and future 1st for pick 2 I can't remember seeing that reported anywhere does that mean you're wrong?.
 
Maybe but it's something to discuss at least for the next week and a half. Didn't you recently say north offered 20 and future 1st for pick 2 I can't remember seeing that reported anywhere does that mean you're wrong?.
the post was that we had agreed to a trade and it was done - not at the discussion stage between two clubs - there have and will be plenty of offers discussed and made and turned town that won't be reported by the media and I can easily be wrong
 
The chances of a significant pick swap trade leaking to big footy but not the AFL media and actually being true would be .00001% so yes someone can post the Dumb and Dumber gif
I mean sure the chances of the rumor being true aren’t super high but there’s plenty of times where rumors turn up on BigFooty a long time before they hit any media.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top