Analysis 2021 draft thread

Remove this Banner Ad

I think the player on our list that Wilmot is most similar to is Madden. He seems like the run and carry we would like off half back. Won't replace Rich's kicking though but perhaps Prior or Michael might be able to
I have high hopes for Carter Michael - his kicking could be a great weapon. Wouldn't be surprised if he becomes Richy's heir-apparent next season.
 
Yep a lot of mind games and BS out there. Wouldn't be surprised if we weren't that keen on Wilmot. Unless someone is leaking out info unofficially
Wilmot really does sound like a Brisbane pick though.

At 16, I'll be meh about it, but fine. Mostly just because I'm hoping we get a slider at 16.
At 20, I'll be satisfied with Wilmot.
At trade-up-to-get-him, I'd be cranky for a few days.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

There doesn't seem to be much talk about Brisbane's 3rd draft pick, so would there be any chance of a swap with Freo.
14, 18 and 41 for 8, 19 and 68. This equate to the same number of points.
Huge advantage if Brisbane is willing to sacrifice pick 41 and hope for a late draft gem.
Also, 19 would allow for a first pick on night 2, same as the year we got Dev Robertson.
 
There doesn't seem to be much talk about Brisbane's 3rd draft pick, so would there be any chance of a swap with Freo.
14, 18 and 41 for 8, 19 and 68. This equate to the same number of points.
Huge advantage if Brisbane is willing to sacrifice pick 41 and hope for a late draft gem.
Also, 19 would allow for a first pick on night 2, same as the year we got Dev Robertson.

No club would do that trade with us...
 
Yep a lot of mind games and BS out there. Wouldn't be surprised if we weren't that keen on Wilmot. Unless someone is leaking out info unofficially

Yep, I'd be lying my arse off if Twomey asked me who we were looking at.

No way am I giving out actual mail, especially this year.

I'd be more dishonest and untrustworthy than Tim Paine.
 
Our 1st round selections from 2000 onwards >

2000- Ashley McGrath (13).
2001- Jason Gram (19).
2002- Jarred Brennan (3).
2003- Llane Spannderman (18).
2004- Cameron Wood (18).
2005- Mitch Clark (9).
2006- Matthew Leuenberger (4).
2007- Lachlan Henderson (8).
2008- Daniel Rich (7).
2009- No selections.
2010- Jared Polec (5), Patrick Karnezis (25).
2011- Billy Longer (8), Sam Docherty (12).
2012- Sam Mayes (8), Marco Paparone (23).
2013- James Aish (7).
2014- No selections.
2015- Josh Schache (2), Eric Hipwood (14)
2016- Hugh McCluggage (3), Jarrod Berry (17).
2017- Cameron Rayner (1), Zac Bailey (15), Brandon Starcevich (18).
2018- Ely Smith (21).
2019- No Selections.
2020- Blake Coleman (24).
______________________________________
Pretty grim reading overall but 2016-17 stand out like dog testicles as great to really good drafts, apart from that not too much to get excited about other than 2000 Ash, 2008 Richy and Hippy in 2015..... Brennan 2002 and Luey 2006 are passes but didn't quite live up to the hype.
Thanks for the research. Without causing a great debate, I'd say Rich, McGrath, McLuggage, Luenberger (Lions & Dons) Henderson (Blues & Cats) were good picks, thats just 23% success rate. Rayner is still to 'break out', Brennan - maybe added. If you add in all picks in the first round with Bailey, Starcevich, Berry, Hipwood it gets a little better but marginally.
 
Wilmot appears to be a tough competitor and with a bit of Mongrel.
Could always do with another one of them. I also think that he is a very Lions type pick.
I'll take a tough competitor with a bit of mongrel anytime, especially in defense. He obviously has some talent and if he has a good work ethic on and off the field, I'd be happy to take him. Being younger it may take a cpl of years to break out but I'm OK with that too.

I'd be happy with Butler also. He reads as having midfield potential as well as being a sm fwd.

If we could round it out with Jack Williams, (I know I know not likely to be there but I can hope), I'd be wrapped with our draft haul.

Just as likely it's none of the above. Whoever we do take I don't see them cracking best 22 in their first season, like devrob or sharpie did. I think we're looking a cpl of years ahead at least with this draft. Happy to be proven wrong though.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'll take a tough competitor with a bit of mongrel anytime, especially in defense. He obviously has some talent and if he has a good work ethic on and off the field, I'd be happy to take him. Being younger it may take a cpl of years to break out but I'm OK with that too.

I'd be happy with Butler also. He reads as having midfield potential as well as being a sm fwd.

If we could round it out with Jack Williams, (I know I know not likely to be there but I can hope), I'd be wrapped with our draft haul.

Just as likely it's none of the above. Whoever we do take I don't see them cracking best 22 in their first season, like devrob or sharpie did. I think we're looking a cpl of years ahead at least with this draft. Happy to be proven wrong though.
I think the best chance for a draftee to crack the 22 consistently would have to be off half-back replacing Birchall, definitely would be tough though. Other than that I could see Butler getting a few games for us up forward as a goal sneak/pressure forward but even there we've got good depth.
 

Another phantom with us taking Wilmot and JVR.

Has Sinn taken at 11, Chesser a bit of a bolter at 12. Johnson at 17 and Goater at 18 are interesting. Wouldn't mind Johnson as a taller mid.
 

Another phantom with us taking Wilmot and JVR.

Has Sinn taken at 11, Chesser a bit of a bolter at 12. Johnson at 17 and Goater at 18 are interesting. Wouldn't mind Johnson as a taller mid.

Most mocks have Richmond either taking Gibcus at 9 or JvR with 17. Pick 9 could dictate if we take JvR at 16 or wait until 20
 
Apologies if this has been mentioned earlier (81 pages is a LOT to scroll through)... but I simply cannot fathom why if you had the early picks you wouldn't just pick Daicos and Darcy, and bend the Dogs and Collingwood over as best you can. I get why North might take Horne-Francis at #1 so the young man gets the $10k, but surely if you're the Giants, this is a great chance to force not 1 club but 2 to burn as many draft picks as possible.

I am by no means a draft nuffy so maybe someone who is more knowledgeable can explain this one to me?
 
Apologies if this has been mentioned earlier (81 pages is a LOT to scroll through)... but I simply cannot fathom why if you had the early picks you wouldn't just pick Daicos and Darcy, and bend the Dogs and Collingwood over as best you can. I get why North might take Horne-Francis at #1 so the young man gets the $10k, but surely if you're the Giants, this is a great chance to force not 1 club but 2 to burn as many draft picks as possible.

I am by no means a draft nuffy so maybe someone who is more knowledgeable can explain this one to me?

Yeah Giants not bidding on Daicos is a real head scratcher. Particularly because Pies hold picks 36, 38, 40, 46, 48 which will get chewed up to match the bid, thus moving GWS' picks 53, 54, 70 up the board and making them more valuable for matching a bid on their academy player Fahey. More points they wipe from the Pies the better their draft position.
 
What's the difference between GWS bidding and not bidding in terms of what Collingwood or the Bulldogs later picks would be? I can't imagine by the time it gets to the back end of the draft that there would be much of a difference. Why bother risking drafting a player who doesn't want to be there?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Analysis 2021 draft thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top