- Moderator
- #679
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Surely the concern is that at his listed 181cm height he will have limited marking ability against men?
If he is 181cm he is 4cm shorter than Jack Martin and only 1cm taller than Matt Owies.
Geez mate. We all have our likes and dislikes, and our opinions, but this is just so far off. Far off my observations and that of a great many decent draft watchers. He played inside during the bulk of the championships, not off a wing, he played there under age, where he had the reputation of an elite user.Nothing alike, Campo had better vision, composure and footskills
Your first line is appropriate. Hotton is more hybrid forward than mid at this stage. While I wouldn’t discount him playing midfield as he is a “goer”, he can crumb to a high level and take an excellent mark for his size. The thing is question for his ceiling at the next level would be defensive mindset and workrate. None has been on show during the championship games. I am not dismissing it off hand, but has not been on display until now. It has not needed to be with the game style in the under 18’s. He has been an offensive weapon.Hotton fits perfectly into our squad, dangerous as a marking forward or HHF and can rotate through the middle
Has Archie Perkin attributes, but can also play as a rebound defender
Can he kick?Really liking Allen. Wingman at his height could dangerous match up
Geez mate. We all have our likes and dislikes, and our opinions, but this is just so far off. Far off my observations and that of a great many decent draft watchers. He played inside during the bulk of the championships, not off a wing, he played there under age, where he had the reputation of an elite user.
The other consideration is comparing players from different eras. There is so very much more congestion in the game today. In Campo’s day, we all played our positions. Today half of the team are pseudo on-ballers. Forwards flood back and a decent number of defenders play largely offensive roles. The levels of composure you refer to are very rare in the modern game unless playing behind the ball.
I happily pass on why I prefer one player over another, particularly from a perception of our needs. To state an opinion as fact to emphasise a contra view is mischievous.
Your first line is appropriate. Hotton is more hybrid forward than mid at this stage. While I wouldn’t discount him playing midfield as he is a “goer”, he can crumb to a high level and take an excellent mark for his size. The thing is question for his ceiling at the next level would be defensive mindset and workrate. None has been on show during the championship games. I am not dismissing it off hand, but has not been on display until now. It has not needed to be with the game style in the under 18’s. He has been an offensive weapon.
I like Hotton, but there are question marks which suggest to me late first of early second rounder. I have seen nothing to suggest he is a defensive rebounder.
I originally watched both Hotton and Hollands (prior to Acres signing) as prospective
wingers and deduced Hollands could, but Hotton doesn’t show the traits, especially positional discipline. He did show some outstanding forward skills and smarts. Certainly nice to have, but is it a first pick priority. As Arr0w has agreed watching for a pure winger drew my attention to Darcy Edmends who has received little press. No longer a prime need, although I am keen to add a midfielder who could play early off a wing, half back or half forward. Hollands is that player as is Phillipou at the other end if he slides.
Picking Hollands for need is not necessarily the wrong decision. There will always be an opportunity cost, missing out on Mckenzie etc. He just looks a 150 game lock in a position(s) we do not have covered.
Could someone compare Hollands to Camporeale in 1995
I think it is for us.Hotton did show some outstanding forward skills and smarts. Certainly nice to have, but is it a first pick priority.
Gerard Healy on his new radio show mentioned Dowling a couple of times…got the feeling he knows of some who are pretty interested.I don't see him as an elite user, over the last 2 years. What I see is great endurance, amazing workrate defensively, willingness to get to the next contest. Hollands is naturally an inside type, but that doesn't mean he can't improve his composure and ball use to be a wingman
Not stating an opinion as fact, not even recruiters are capable of that as we don't know how they will develop, but Campo's footskills are way beyond what Hollands as shown
Hotton doesn't have the defensive side of Hollands, but it isn't poor. Hotton has played as a rebounding defender. Then he transitioned to playing through the middle and in the last 12 months hss been working on his forward craft. I think he has huge upside, much more than Hollands
Edmends, like Dowling is criminally underrated. Edmends doesn't get a heap of the pill, but his composure and ball use on both sides of the body is similar to Sidebottom
Dowling, I rate him late first early second, but will probably be drafted mid to late 3rd round
His decision making in terms of disposal is elite, can play in any arc, as well as inside or balanced mid.
Gerard Healy on his new radio show mentioned Dowling a couple of times…got the feeling he knows of some who are pretty interested.
I tend to agree with all of that re Hollands. I watched the Vic Country/Allies and the Vic Country/SA replays during the week, and was not that impressed what I saw from someone who is touted as a top 10 pick. The Allies game he was pretty much non existent, and the SA match had plenty of the ball without having a lot of impact on the game. Probably similar for the Vic Country/Vic Metro final, although I can't seem to find a replay of the match.Still can’t get excited watching further highlights of Hollands.
Feel like a broken record, but a lot of the vision centres around him being slightly smarter than his opponents on transition and having decent defensive awareness. These aren’t especially bad traits, but they won’t be a point of difference at AFL level.
Kicking looks than better expected, but he also won’t have the kind of space he’s afforded currently and he also does have a tendency to loop the ball a bit.
Feel like him being put up as a top end pick - along with someone like Cam McKenzie - indicates a fairly shallow top end.
I’d be comfortable taking him as a late first/early second but he has to be one of the more middling prospective Top 10 picks I can recall.
You mean you don't refer to them as *? I'm very confused.What does the * mean? I'm very confused. Is it Essendon?
Yep I like edmends as well.Geez mate. We all have our likes and dislikes, and our opinions, but this is just so far off. Far off my observations and that of a great many decent draft watchers. He played inside during the bulk of the championships, not off a wing, he played there under age, where he had the reputation of an elite user.
The other consideration is comparing players from different eras. There is so very much more congestion in the game today. In Campo’s day, we all played our positions. Today half of the team are pseudo on-ballers. Forwards flood back and a decent number of defenders play largely offensive roles. The levels of composure you refer to are very rare in the modern game unless playing behind the ball.
I happily pass on why I prefer one player over another, particularly from a perception of our needs. To state an opinion as fact to emphasise a contra view is mischievous.
Your first line is appropriate. Hotton is more hybrid forward than mid at this stage. While I wouldn’t discount him playing midfield as he is a “goer”, he can crumb to a high level and take an excellent mark for his size. The thing is question for his ceiling at the next level would be defensive mindset and workrate. None has been on show during the championship games. I am not dismissing it off hand, but has not been on display until now. It has not needed to be with the game style in the under 18’s. He has been an offensive weapon.
I like Hotton, but there are question marks which suggest to me late first of early second rounder. I have seen nothing to suggest he is a defensive rebounder.
I originally watched both Hotton and Hollands (prior to Acres signing) as prospective
wingers and deduced Hollands could, but Hotton doesn’t show the traits, especially positional discipline. He did show some outstanding forward skills and smarts. Certainly nice to have, but is it a first pick priority. As Arr0w has agreed watching for a pure winger drew my attention to Darcy Edmends who has received little press. No longer a prime need, although I am keen to add a midfielder who could play early off a wing, half back or half forward. Hollands is that player as is Phillipou at the other end if he slides.
Pre draft simmo? You would of happily given up pick 10 to draft a Simpson/ Simpson type based on that moment, not what his career turned out to be?Yep
I wouldn’t use it on blokes like Philipou who is a shocking kick in my view. Not what we need at all.
Yup hope he’s our boy come draft night, would be an astute choice, given close mentoring will mature & develop nicely, not having huge pressure to impact in his initial few years, is a significant advantage it makes all the difference. Loves the club too what’s not to like.Huge call incoming:
Oliver Hollands is a right footed clone of Kade Simpson.
Get.
No current season stats available
No, no, no, no, no. I called Walsh Vanilla. I copyrighted it. And got howled down…….justifiably. Not even in the same tub though. That’s like someone saying Hewett is Judd II. ……… oh wait.Not a fan of Hollands at pick 11. Sam Walsh type … vanilla.
If that is actually the case, the Blues picking him up on draft night is a formality. Simmo had it all bar a decent right foot.Huge call incoming:
Oliver Hollands is a right footed clone of Kade Simpson.
Get.
Well, apparently Daicos is better than Walsh who's never stood up on the big stage. So no why would you want another.Not a fan of Hollands at pick 11. Sam Walshtype … vanilla.PLAYERCARDSTART18Sam Walsh
- Age
- 24
- Ht
- 184cm
- Wt
- 84kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 25.1
- 5star
- K
- 13.5
- 5star
- HB
- 11.6
- 5star
- M
- 5.1
- 5star
- T
- 3.2
- 5star
- CL
- 3.4
- 5star
No current season stats available
- D
- 26.2
- 5star
- K
- 15.4
- 5star
- HB
- 10.8
- 5star
- M
- 6.0
- 5star
- T
- 3.2
- 5star
- CL
- 4.8
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
Hollands is dual sidedIf that is actually the case, the Blues picking him up on draft night is a formality. Simmo had it all bar a decent right foot.
That's good to know. If he could be a Steele Sidebottom type (very smelly so know one picks him up) then that would be of great benefit going forward. I just hope we draft a good player. Simple as that.Hollands is dual sided
There are flight concerns with Phillipou, but with Hewett, it's other factors as to why he could slide
Other factors such as?
How do you or any other person doing interviews with players seperate a genuine flight risk, versus a kid who says I’d prefer to stay in WA or SA if I can?
Im not saying there isn’t genuine flight risks in footy, I’d be a flight risk if drafted to GWS or GC, but I think it’s a bit suss that reports of personal issues or flight risks surface only a few weeks from draft, in Hewetts case especially seeing WC have a pick right around where he is expected to go.
A lot of poker going on in these draft interviews I believe