- Moderator
- #679
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
F2 + our 3rd (which we won't be using) for their matching points should be enough for #22 (more like #25).
F1 would be getting a higher pick this year.
Unless they're throwing in their F2 as well.
Yeah, a good chance that teams with presumed lower finishing positions will offer similar.I did say as the focal point. There would be other components in our favour.
F2 + our 3rd would be a very good result but think they could get better than that.
If a bid comes before 22, don’t they have to use it then as their next pick. How do they move it. Or are you talking that’s why they move it. Sorry, confused.Would very much like to see a bid on Davey come prior to pick 22. They'd move the pick if that eventuated and a future 1st would be the focal point of a good piece of business for both clubs.
Of course some won't be happy to part with a first in a 'stronger' draft but if we hit with 22 there's enormous value in bringing a player into the system a year earlier. That extra year of development can be massive.
22 may very well put us in a position to be able to bring in someone like Hotton. Hollands & Hotton would be a fantastic result.
If the bid comes, then they trade it out immediately, before they match the bid.If a bid comes before 22, don’t they have to use it then as their next pick. How do they move it. Or are you talking that’s why they move it. Sorry, confused.
Doesn't solve for us wanting an extra pick either.Would consider 29 + F1 for 22 + F2 with *, if the right player is available.
Doesn’t really solve their points issue though.
That’s unfair I think. If they have it when the bid hits the table, their draft hand should be effectively locked and they must use their next pick………and it’s *.If the bid comes, then they trade it out immediately, before they match the bid.
I don't think it's a particularly unfair aspect of the overall system, especially for a F/S rather than an academy player.That’s unfair I think. If they have it when the bid hits the table, their draft hand should be effectively locked and they must use their next pick………and it’s *.
Wonder if GWS would bid on him after losing Bobby Hill??
sameI think (reserved for future editing) is clearly the best player in the draft and I hope we pick him.
We don’t need a defender who will take three years to develop. We kinda need players that will make our team better in the next year or two.
modelled himself on sps...Good size and has some serious wheels. Wish there was more highlights of this so called prodigious kick.
That sounds great.
Does he run to the right spots? Or is it running for no reward?
On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app
I can't believe (reserved for future editing) lasted until our (whatever we end up with) pick.I think (reserved for future editing) is clearly the best player in the draft and I hope we pick him.
Good point, I’m actually unsure on the rules here. I hope you are right and that would force a deal done earlierThat’s unfair I think. If they have it when the bid hits the table, their draft hand should be effectively locked and they must use their next pick………and it’s *.
Wonder if GWS would bid on him after losing Bobby Hill??
doesn't turn 18 till a few days after Xmas.Like his confidence and x factor. We need another player in the team capable of being a spark running through the middle.
No issue with clubs having access to f/s, academy or nga players, I would just remove the discount
So, if North bid on Ashcoft at pick 2, they can still use later picks to match, but the value needs to be the same as pick 2
Would also stop the bullshit bids
Is that because you rate him that high?If we retain pick 10, I would bid on Fletcher
SOS. Is that you?If we retain pick 10, I would bid on Fletcher