- Moderator
- #679
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They love him, I'm told he impressed many at training on his first proper day too - explosive and endurance runningPoor Binns - the recruitment team did not show too much excitement with that pick
Any of them will doing well to play 5 games.Prediction time. How many AFL games will each of our new draftees play in 2023?
Tall. blonde. can run.Has got some nick Riewoldt about him
Sent from my moto e(7) using Tapatalk
Not in the traditional sense of either being a tall or a crumber.He is not a forward
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Agree, all 2022 draftees are just skinny youngsters whom need orientation, mentoring and hard work, developing better team cohesiveness and hopefully AFL standard. Welcome to the big time, it’s no longer school footy, every lad will respond differently let’s be patient. Character and attitude seem ok with all our lads and that’s the first big hurdle.
Hi peeps.
I've had a long, tiring 2022 and am going to go walkabout over the off-season. Just thought I'd put it out there.... you know, in case nobody noticed I was gone
In advance, Merry Xmas, Kwanza, Channuka, Festivus, Gregorian New Year, Lunar New Year, The List Finally Looks Healthy Hour and Annual Training The House Down Day.
Please leave an SSP spot open for me to rejoin the BF list in 2023
St Kilda won the trade period a few years ago with the Hill et al haul. How did that work out for them in the long term? Not a knock on your comment, which feels appropriately sarcastic, but these who won the…insert random AFL plaything…doesn’t put any actual wins or percentage on the board.
It’s all about what you do with it. Off to the Preseason thread.
1. They didn't show any vision before the Holland pick, like they did with the other picks, so I think maybe most, if not all, the players selected before him would have been selected by us, too, if they were available to us.My read of the mic'd up session was that:
1. Hollands was the clear choice at first pick following other team's selections - we will never know if anyone was preferred ahead of him but dint get the chance to get them - I think Club ''needs' was #1 priority here
2. Voss and Austin were really happy to land Cowen at the second pick ( I think the comment was cant believe he lasted for us) and the pick#2 swap with Collingwood was done in order to secure him and was subject (of course) to availability - definitely, a strategy that had been organised between Collingwood and Carlton prior to the night - clearly Cowen highly rated - I think best player available was in play here
3. Binns was the next pick in order to someone who had been taken previously - I think this was a selection team pick more than anything else
and - I think this one falls into ''needs category"
4. Austin was super pumped to get Lemmey as the 4th - again I think this was a selection team pick - I think this one looks like best player available
Austin made two comments during the edited session that were interesting to me
1. Running capability of the list has changed a lot ( looking at Voss and Cook) are you happy?
2. Lemmey definitely had Austin excited due to his height and versatility - comments made to Cook - twice.
Jakob Ryan was the other2. It seems Cowan was one of the two Austin pointed to on the list (when taking earlier with Cook) who would be a prime target.
3. Binns could have been the other of those two Austin mentioned, but maybe not.
Cowan looks the most AFL ready in terms of his physique, but he plays in one of the most loaded parts of the ground for us at half back. He’s going to start behind Doc, Saad, Williams, Newman and Boyd. That’s a good problem to have and shows the depth in this part of the list.Prediction time. How many AFL games will each of our new draftees play in 2023?
If opposition clubs know exactly what we're seeking, that puts at a disadvantage in every trade discussion and contract signing. That's the problem.How is that a problem. They know what they wanted and they got it done without hesitation. Your opinion in from your armchair. Our recruiting team has been tracking them every weekend for 2-4 years. They do plenty of research, interviews etc.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
If opposition clubs know exactly what we're seeking, that puts at a disadvantage in every trade discussion and contract signing. That's the problem.
If you don't funnel yourself into drafting for needs or effectively announcing favourites, you can trade down and up more regularly and improve your hand as you acquire players you really like for the short and medium term if you so desire.
I think we are a bit better though than when Nat Southby used to announce our picks on Twitter approximately two weeks before the draft.If opposition clubs know exactly what we're seeking, that puts at a disadvantage in every trade discussion and contract signing. That's the problem.
If you don't funnel yourself into drafting for needs or effectively announcing favourites, you can trade down and up more regularly and improve your hand as you acquire players you really like for the short and medium term if you so desire.
And yet all and sundry knew we were going to be fixated on drafting in high endurance wingers.I think we are a bit better though than when Nat Southby used to announce our picks on Twitter approximately two weeks before the draft.
Other than the Swans, how many clubs surprised with their picks before Freo came in at #33?And yet all and sundry knew we were going to be fixated on drafting in high endurance wingers.
After pick 15 and the bids? Hawthorn, West Coast.Other than the Swans, how many clubs surprised with their picks before Freo came in at #33?
It was only a surprise that Hawthorn got the trade done, and that happened due to West Coast going earlier with Hewett than most thought. But it wasn't a surprise that West Coast picked Hewett.After pick 15 and the bids? Hawthorn, West Coast.
Cowan pick #2 isn't a wingman and neither is Leemay is he?And yet all and sundry knew we were going to be fixated on drafting in high endurance wingers.
I could hear Austin say binns wouldn’t last to our next pick.My read of the mic'd up session was that:
1. Hollands was the clear choice at first pick following other team's selections - we will never know if anyone was preferred ahead of him but dint get the chance to get them - I think Club ''needs' was #1 priority here
2. Voss and Austin were really happy to land Cowen at the second pick ( I think the comment was cant believe he lasted for us) and the pick#2 swap with Collingwood was done in order to secure him and was subject (of course) to availability - definitely, a strategy that had been organised between Collingwood and Carlton prior to the night - clearly Cowen highly rated - I think best player available was in play here
3. Binns was the next pick in order to someone who had been taken previously - I think this was a selection team pick more than anything else
and - I think this one falls into ''needs category"
4. Austin was super pumped to get Lemmey as the 4th - again I think this was a selection team pick - I think this one looks like best player available
Austin made two comments during the edited session that were interesting to me
1. Running capability of the list has changed a lot ( looking at Voss and Cook) are you happy?
2. Lemmey definitely had Austin excited due to his height and versatility - comments made to Cook - twice.
Might have been discussed and agreed in principal however clearly would not have gone ahead if the player that we wanted (Cowan) was not still availableOur pick trade with Collingwood was already in place before draft night.
Pretty sure Hewett was before pick 15, the surprise for them - at least from my perspective - was going for Barnett that early, or at all.It was only a surprise that Hawthorn got the trade done, and that happened due to West Coast going earlier with Hewett than most thought. But it wasn't a surprise that West Coast picked Hewett.