Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Norf and WCE are the only other lists around our mark. immediately in front of us on the table, Essendon and Hawks are far better lists.
Remember that whatever we have done this year results wise has been done with minimal injuries, it couldn't have got any better.
Comparing Crows 2022 and Richmond 2016 is laughable, the lists are so much different. There is absolutely no similarity to lists or situations that give hope we are going to bolt up the ladder next year or the year after.They still had Cotchin, Reiwoldt, Martin and Rance.
Absolute guns who all formed the core of that 2017 side.
It’s just flat out wrong and a director of footy is about the last person who can afford to have incorrect philosophies. Selecting an in form player from the 2s ahead of an out of form or injured player is never a balancing act and experience levels between the 2 and those of the other 20 are totally and utterly irrelevant.
What is a balancing act at selection though is how many of certain types of players can fit in a 22. So when someone like McAdam is a late out you need to consider how the side will look if you replace him with an inside midfielder. There’s a balancing act there, but if you ask our club, we seem to think the most important factor out of the 2 is games played. And that is controversial and entirely incorrect.
Piss off troll
Sorry mate I've only ever put one poster on ignore..old mate Abab...but your very close to joining him.It’s not a troll, it’s a genuine question. You made a statement pretty much exactly like that but seem to refuse to identify which of the current group have the same issue that you didn’t want more of.
I’d argue trolling is flatly rejecting or LOLing people’s recruitment ideas based on factors that you refuse to elaborate further on. You said he had poor disposal and would just be more of the same. So who is the existing same? Surely you can identify a single mid in our collective who has average disposal? Or how about naming one who lacks damage with ball in hand.
We beat two very high quality teams to make a grand final - but maybe we shouldn't be criticizing other sides under achieving ...Are we really going to throw stones in that greenhouse?
He’s actually asking legitimate questions and when confronted with having to answer a question where you know the answer is a negative you avoid it. Being positive all the time with no critical thinking is actually boring.Sorry mate I've only ever put one poster on ignore..old mate Abab...but your very close to joining him.
Your endless negative graffiti is just plain boring.
You can keep up the Vader impression
Unlike Adelaide, they'll do whatever it takes to get better. They were smart enough to go the full blown tank when their season was DOA. They'll sack underperformers in their footy dept., trade/delist fan favourites etc. They'll make the 8 again long before we do.West Coast are well run. They will bounce back pretty quickly.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Sorry mate I've only ever put one poster on ignore..old mate Abab...but your very close to joining him.
Your endless negative graffiti is just plain boring.
We better be bloody sure the he’s a generation player and better then anyone in the top 3 this year before we give anything up. Every year it seems we wish we could get player x and we miss out, the next year it’s all over again.I have heard through a player manager that JHF is definitely wanting to come home. He also said that the Crows are going hard for him. North want a top pick (I’d suggest our pick 3) and a player. Other than Rachele I can’t see who they would want.
Not sure how todays coaches announcement at North will change his thinking.
I also heard (different source) that Port are keen on Dunkley. They think it’s the edge they need to give the 2023 flag a real push.
You don’t want to give up a top 3 pick for him based on what you might be giving up but they are unknowns. There is no way of knowing if they are better than JHF until they are playing AFL and you can compare.We better be bloody sure the he’s a generation player and better then anyone in the top 3 this year before we give anything up. Every year it seems we wish we could get player x and we miss out, the next year it’s all over again.
If he potentially better then Phillipou?? Or anyone else in the top 3. We are in a rebuild and I’m not giving up anything yet, we may get him the next year when he’s uncontracted. If Tex gets injured or is out of form we may end up below them and can get him for less
We better be bloody sure the he’s a generation player and better then anyone in the top 3 this year before we give anything up. Every year it seems we wish we could get player x and we miss out, the next year it’s all over again.
If he potentially better then Phillipou?? Or anyone else in the top 3. We are in a rebuild and I’m not giving up anything yet, we may get him the next year when he’s uncontracted. If Tex gets injured or is out of form we may end up below them and can get him for less
I'm not missing either to be honest.You can keep up the Vader impression by saying Greenwood was terrible, but it isn’t and wasn’t true.
It’s just not. And Keath has been a LOT better than ok
All I’m saying is it was Horne last year and this year it will be someone else. Will the new draftees be better or worse then Horne?? What’s the draft capital we give up to get him?? I certainly don’t do pick 3 and Rachelle. He are in the same position as them, rebuilding.Don’t fall into the trap of just playing name bingo with whoever the new players are in any draft year
It’s always the same, name bingo without any substantive analysis
What part of the past 5 years stood out to Graham as not being a basket case.Graham Cornes: "The Crows won't ask for a priority pick. That's for basket case clubs"
Have another think, Graham.
The key difference here is that Hardwick had an upward trajectory right from the beginning. He took over a dismal Richmond side that won 5 games in 2009. Then went 6 wins, 8 wins, 10 wins in his first 3 years. Then in the next 3 years he made the finals. Including two 15 win seasons.
Year 7 and your post was based in 2016 when everything went backwards and the tough decision needed to be made. He had already had 7 years in charge and had shown significant improvement.
Our issue is that 3 years under Nicks and to 95% of people there has been no upward trend. Nicks took over a 10 win team from 2019. Since then in almost 3 seasons we have 15 wins and Nicks has a record eerily similar to Mathew Primus.
Exactly, if it’s a pick 3 for him that’s ok but to lose another player on top when we are desperate for quality players isn’t smart.You don’t want to give up a top 3 pick for him based on what you might be giving up but they are unknowns. There is no way of knowing if they are better than JHF until they are playing AFL and you can compare.
Exactly ... and the line of who is performing week to week tends to show the younger guys standing up in batches with substandard returns from our senior group as a whole .How do they know we won't be competitive?
It's not like we've tried it and it's failed
Calling the 2019 side a 10 win team doesnt reflect where the club was at.
That year we won 2 of the last 9 games. The downward spiral had already begun.
Sholl is a much better kick and doesn't get knocked out every 2nd week.
Stupidly simplisticHard to call a 10 win team anything but a 10 win team.
Stupidly simplistic