Game Day 2022 Trade Period Match Thread

[Snuffaluphagus]

Thanks for making this an awesome trade period peeps. Will be locking this thread later tonight

 

[freo1997]

What’s the update, according to Da Colon.

 

[Johnny Dalmas]

like i said is a pick from 20-25 is overs

Yes, I agree but its not "way overs".

The deal we got for Brad Hill I would call "way overs": it was definitely worth doing. If someone is stupid enough to offer a similar way overs deal for Lobb, then sure.

But I just can't see any benefit in us in accept a "fair" deal or even a slightly overs deal. What do we get out of it? A 2nd rounder? Why do we care? When we are giving up a bona fide FF for a year?

If it is a missing piece in some other trade, then sure do the deal. But there has to a reason for the FFC to trade out Lobb. Him wanting to live in Melbourne isn't much of a reason for Freo, however compelling it is for Rory.

 

[Joose]

What’s the update, according to Da Colon.

Acres hopefully done by Tues, Logue later in the week.

Will continue to try and get Lobb done but it sounds like Freo have dug in.

 

[Swiggy]

You just went through our inability to fit forwards in with Jackson and Lobb, but think it is different with another forward. Have I got that right?

No im saying freo will try to bring another forward on this list..

 

[Taylor]

Logue later in the week.

Once North have secured Bowes and pick #7..

 

[Swiggy]

Once North have secured Bowes and pick #7..

11 for lobb 7 for Logue - you should be list manager

 

[Johnny Dalmas]

Once North have secured Bowes and pick #7..

So your great fantasy for this trade period is that North win the Bowes lottery and then thankfully trade #7 to us for Logue, Tucker, and some futures?

I like your (wishful) thinking, but I can't see that happening.

 

[Taylor]

So your great fantasy for this trade period is that North win the Bowes lottery and then thankfully trade #7 to us for Logue, Tucker, and some futures?

I like your (wishful) thinking, but I can't see that happening.

In this fantasy we trade Logue, Tucker, our future second and third picks for #7, F2 PP and F3 PP

None of those picks cost North anything other than cap space.

 

[DragoDelph]

In this fantasy we trade Logue, Tucker, our future second and third picks for #7, F2 PP and F3 PP

None of those picks cost North anything other than cap space.

Which is all done AFTER Jackson

 

[Taylor]

Which is all done AFTER Jackson

We could swap our future first for their actual future second if it helps both situations.

Logue, Tucker, F1, F2, F3 for #7, F2, F2 PP and F3 PP

Then #13 and F2 for Jackson

 

[Kram]

I wish this would just hurry up and all be over.

 

[wakojako]

Taylor if the rumour of Treacy being homesick is true, what are the chances of the club knowing about this already?

 

[Taylor]

Then #13 and F2 for Jackson

This, assuming North don't finish dead last, is between pick #3 and pick #4 on points. That's reasonable.

 

[Taylor]

Taylor if the rumour of Treacy being homesick is true, what are the chances of the club knowing about this already?

If he has spoken to the club at his exit interview about it he would mention that if a trade can be found he would be open to it.

I wouldn't expect to hear about it publicly.

 

[Swiggy]

If he has spoken to the club at his exit interview about it he would mention that if a trade can be found he would be open to it.

I wouldn't expect to hear about it publicly.

he just opened his own business surely he'll stay

 

[Fyfster]

Lobb, Logue, and our first for Jackson


Logue for f2

Lobb 13 and f2 (19-22) for 11 and 15? Whatevs they get from brissy

11 and 15 for Jackson


Feels like we getting stiffed but I can see this being the basis

We keep F1 in this scenario

Am I reading this right? 2 players and a first rounder for Jackson.

 

[freo_leo29]

Am I reading this right? 2 players and a first rounder for Jackson.

Yes

but we are getting bent on Logue anyway so its the make the best out of a bad situation


allows us to hold onto our f1

 

[Fyfster]

Yes

but we are getting bent on Logue anyway so its the make the best out of a bad situation


allows us to hold onto our f1

Jackson had a worse season than both Logue and Lobb in reality , I am very against the Jackson trade BTW He has just been way overvalued on exposed form.

 

[raffrox]

Would we rate an still contracted Jordan Clark

6

Jordan Clark

Age

24

Ht

185cm

Wt

83kg

Pos.

Def

Career

Season

Last 5

D

13.7

4star

K

9.4

4star

HB

4.3

3star

M

4.2

4star

T

2.6

4star

MG

172.0

3star

D

12.5

3star

K

8.5

3star

HB

4.0

3star

M

4.0

4star

T

1.5

2star

MG

172.0

3star

D

12.2

3star

K

10.4

4star

HB

1.8

2star

M

3.4

4star

T

2.4

4star

at time of the trade worth more or less than an out of contract Griffin Logue

19

Griffin Logue

Age

26

Ht

193cm

Wt

100kg

Pos.

Def

Career

Season

Last 5

D

9.8

2star

K

4.4

2star

HB

5.4

4star

M

2.4

3star

T

1.0

3star

MG

115.4

2star

D

9.8

2star

K

4.4

2star

HB

5.4

3star

M

2.4

3star

T

1.0

2star

MG

115.4

2star

D

9.8

3star

K

4.4

2star

HB

5.4

4star

M

2.4

3star

T

1.0

3star

MG

115.4

2star

?

We won't get more than what we gave for Clark last year.

 

[Fyfster]

Would we rate an still contracted Jordan Clark at time of the trade worth more or less than an out of contract Griffin Logue?

We won't get more than what we gave for Clark last year.

Logue is B22 at Freo , Clarke was not at Geelong , So one cancels the other so about the same . Except Key position players should always demand more than flankers.

 

[Ge3ks]

I'm doing this just waive some dictator mod energy in your face

That's ok, but can we have some trade period dates stickied up top? I just had a look on the AFL website and could not find them.

 

[Taylor]

That's ok, but can we have some trade period dates stickied up top? I just had a look on the AFL website and could not find them.

I have them on a thread on the draft board called important dates and free agency moves but I am on way too strong drugs right now to find it. I'll quote it across in the morning.

 

[sansian]

The thing that annoys me with Logue, is we have a top 10 pick they the club doesn't think is best 22, so we are not going to give me big $$

Appears to be a bad recruitment in the first place.

Mind you, I just looked at that draft year and there wasn't anyone besides Brodie and English that I would have taken. So maybe he was the best choice

 

[Swiggy]

Logue is B22 at Freo , Clarke was not at Geelong , So one cancels the other so about the same . Except Key position players should always demand more than flankers.

Logue isn't best 22 he was moved forward because he didn't fit in back 7, and was only forward because of injuries

 

[Fyfster]

Logue isn't best 22 he was moved forward because he didn't fit in back 7, and was only forward because of injuries

Well we agree to disagree