Snuffaluphagus
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 10, 2015
- 25,399
- 87,997
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Thanks for making this an awesome trade period peeps. Will be locking this thread later tonight
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You tickets on yourself. Good call I guess.
I also would rather we held our F2 but as per my post above - we compromised on two trades that got posters hot under the popped collars - Logue/Tucker - giving up F3 (with F4 in return) and giving up F2 (44 and 67 in return).
F2 (29-33), F3 (48 - 52) > 40, 58, F4 (57-61)
Brisbane need all of the following picks to match a bid at pick 1 for Ashcroft: 34, 35, 36, 38, 55, 56. Then for a bid later in the first round for Fletcher they will need to trade back into the third round (couple of picks around the 50’s if possible to limit the 2023 deficit) using future third (WB).
In reality the compromised trade with Melbourne cost us Sharp. Now I liked Sharp (not getting him opens up opportunity for Johnson to develop on the Wing in addition to Henry, Worner, NOD, Aish) but the cost being demanded by GCS is just too high for mine.
“It is better to keep one’s mouth shut and be thought of as a fool than to open it and remove all doubt”
Nope, was it something hilarious?Did you hear how the Demons list manager described Schache?
Has anyone done the math on our 2023 pick values pre and post trade period based on current ladder position?
I have a hypothesis we have significantly improved our points in 23.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Yeah, but we were never going to have our two firsts.Actually, we are worse off this year and next.
2022
Pre-Draft 13,76 (1212)
Post Draft 30, 44, 67, 76 (1060)
2023
Pre-Draft 13, 31, 49, 67 (2174)
Post Draft 20, 38, 47, 56 (1887)
Yeah, but we were never going to have our two firsts.
Difference being 152 points (pick 60) in 2022, and 227 points (pick 53) in 2023. IMHO that’s worth the ins v outs.Actually, we are worse off this year and next.
2022
Pre-Draft 13,76 (1212)
Post Draft 30, 44, 67, 76 (1060)
2023
Pre-Draft 13, 31, 49, 67 (2174)
Post Draft 20, 38, 47, 56 (1887)
Reading this genuinely makes me completely okay with Freo's trade period considering the ins and I've retracted all melts.Actually, we are worse off this year and next.
2022
Pre-Draft 13,76 (1212)
Post Draft 30, 44, 67, 76 (1060)
2023
Pre-Draft 13, 31, 49, 67 (2174)
Post Draft 20, 38, 47, 56 (1887)
Reading this genuinely makes me completely okay with Freo's trade period considering the ins and I've retracted all melts.
I recon there is a good chance we can climb more than North which will improve that outcome.It’s assuming we maintain 6th and North maintain 18th. The closer those two numbers get the worse it’ll be.
I recon there is a good chance we can climb more than North which will improve that outcome.
Given the outs at Hawthorn, I think they will be giving North a run for 18th.It’s assuming we maintain 6th and North maintain 18th. The closer those two numbers get the worse it’ll be.
West Coast got worse which is hard to believe. They are in with a sniff too.Given the outs at Hawthorn, I think they will be giving North a run for 18th.
Yes, I agree. The three that you could debate are:Difference being 152 points (pick 60) in 2022, and 227 points (pick 53) in 2023. IMHO that’s worth the ins v outs.
The tank is on for Harley Reid.Given the outs at Hawthorn, I think they will be giving North a run for 18th.
GWSWest Coast got worse which is hard to believe. They are in with a sniff too.
3) F2 and Meek for O'Meara looks like we gave away a contracted Meek for free. How Bizarre (how bizarre).
We also got a F4 from a potential wooden spooner in the deal, and that is about all Meek is worth on the open market. Ruck is the least important position on the ground and the market has well and truly been set for backup rucks like Hickey, Cameron, Pittonet, Witts, etc. Yeah, he was under contract, but if we were going to move him on then I don't think that matters too much in this case. If O'Meara wasn't involved, the best we would have got for Meek is 48.
I view the trade as O'Meara for a F2 (Bulldogs) that will likely be in the 30's, plus Hawthorn are paying a chunk of salary. It's a fairly good trade as long as O'Meara stays on the park.