List Mgmt. 2023 List Management and Trading

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Port: no draft collateral. Bring in Grundy, Esava and Zerk-Thatcher

Crows: crap tonne of draft picks. Miss out on a midfielder. Put all eggs into Redman basket and ruin any chance of improving the list.

Sounds about right.
Sure, but they have no picks. The only way they do this is by throwing out best-22 players. The nett result would be a marginal improvement, if that.

Do you want us to do the same?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Sure, but they have no picks. The only way they do this is by throwing out best-22 players. The nett result would be a marginal improvement, if that.

Do you want us to do the same?
Absolutely this should be an option. Doedee a couple of years ago. O'Brien before it's too late.

We were too slow in moving players on in 2018 when the writing was on the wall and we fell in a hole.
 
I wonder how fragile it was for Redman in terms of decision-making?

We looked on the up early in the season. That's tailed away a fraction, maybe still looking a little way off contending.

Bombers going the other way. Gaining strength as the season wore on. I still think they're flighty personally but it would be difficult to walk away now, when a supposed big club appears to be on the brink of something.

I think the stats show that Essendon has actually gone backwards the last few weeks - it just doesn't feel like it because we erre they good week.
 
Sure, but they have no picks. The only way they do this is by throwing out best-22 players. The nett result would be a marginal improvement, if that.

Do you want us to do the same?
Are you for real?- they have a 2nd rounder this year and 2024 picks AND if they trade out a Farrell type (position they are stocked up in) for example to get some extra draft collateral and they solve their KPD problems and ruck problem they will be much better next year as those 2 areas are a real issue for them winning the flag this year
 
Sure, but they have no picks. The only way they do this is by throwing out best-22 players. The nett result would be a marginal improvement, if that.

Do you want us to do the same?
I wish our club had the balls that Port do when it comes to trading out "best 22" players. They seem much better at us at identifying when a player has reached their limit and cashing out for maximum value. I doubt they've ever regretted letting go of the likes of Polec, Wingard, Howard, and Ryder for first round picks.

They can be a bit scattergun when it comes to trading in players, it seems as often as not they just trade for anybody willing to go there. But as far as trading out players at peak value for draft capital, they're very good at getting the better end of the deal.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I wish our club had the balls that Port do when it comes to trading out "best 22" players. They seem much better at us at identifying when a player has reached their limit and cashing out for maximum value. I doubt they've ever regretted letting go of the likes of Polec, Wingard, Howard, and Ryder for first round picks.

They can be a bit scattergun when it comes to trading in players, it seems as often as not they just trade for anybody willing to go there. But as far as trading out players at peak value for draft capital, they're very good at getting the better end of the deal.
In saying that it is ironic that they could have still had Howard how who would've completed their backline. They wouldn't need to look at Ratugolea, Zerk Thatcher or McKay.

On SM-S918B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
So they don't even have to cough up picks?
Seriously, if they get Sanders, pick 3 for McKay and are wedded on McKercher, we may as well trade out of this draft 1st round as there won't be any top end mids available at our pick. And then you have this garbage from journalists who think they know what we need


ADELAIDE CROWS

Draft picks: 6, 20, 24

List chasm: An intercept defender could be a priority for the Crows this off-season. No defender at the club has rated elite for intercept marks this season, while their No. 1 interceptor for several seasons, Tom Doedee, remains unsigned and could be on the move at season’s end. They picked up father-son gun Max Michalanney in last year’s draft, but the Norwood product’s biggest strength when he was drafted was his one-on-one defending. With Nick Murray to miss a lot of next season too, the Crows could target an interceptor.

Ideal draft prospects: If Daniel Curtin — a versatile 195cm prospect who reads the play and kicks the ball superbly — is off the board, Murray Bushrangers star Connor O’Sullivan would have to be considered. O’Sullivan started the year playing as a forward — with the odd midfield stint — but was recently named the Allies’ MVP after averaging 18 disposals and a competition-high eight marks during the champs playing primarily as a defender. Swan Districts’ Riley Hardeman has always been a strong rebounder, but scouts have been pleased to see his growth in confidence to come forward and intercept mark — which was the attribute needed to round off his game — while Sandringham duo Ollie Murphy and Archie Roberts could be other options. The cheeky option would be Hawthorn father-son prospect Will McCabe, who represented South Australia in the recent carnival. The Hawks will be keen to take key defender McCabe — who’s considered a late first-round prospect at this stage — but no doubt the Crows will be keeping close tabs on him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top