thylacine60
Post-Human
- Banned
- #251
Recruiting Lemmey is a sign we are not confident in keeping TDK in my opinion..........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Recruiting Lemmey is a sign we are not confident in keeping TDK in my opinion..........
Very wise observation BigFrizz36. 100% spot onSo we recruited a key forward who had dropped significantly down the rankings due to a poor 2022 because we thought a ruckman was leaving?
May be a bit oblique but if I thought a ruckman was leaving I would have recruited another young ruckman to do an apprenticeship.
bf36 is in our leadership group on wisdom and thinking things...........Very wise observation BigFrizz36. 100% spot on
The win against Hawthorn is hardly an endorsement. 1pt win when we should have had a percentage booster.It's a fair argument, offensively it's something which worked for us really well. DeKoning playing more a decoy role which is often what the third tall does when there are two really good key targets there as well. Silvagni's record with DeKoning and the two keys in the side is very good, as is our record.
You can say you lose a small forward, that's probably Owies, who Silvagni plays a much similar role as at half forward to. Who's better at it? Owies or Silvagni? Owies gives a bit more tackling and Silvagni more in the air. In the past Silvagni has been very good at ground level play though, tackling, feeding out handballs etc. I think rucking took that away a bit.
We started the season with Silvagni, DeKoning, McKay, Curnow and it worked very well until injuries and DeKoning's form changed that. The thing is we didn't get to see it very often but when we did...
Round 1 - Win over Richmond
Round 2 - Win over WBD
Round 3 - Win over Hawthorn
Round 20 (Silvagni for half the game) - Loss to Adelaide
We won every game that TDK, SOS, McKay and Curnow were in play for the total of that game.
Whether it creates issues or not, this setup was awfully successful and generated wins for us, although it's only a small sample size.
There are ways of dealing with the opposition's attacking defenders. 1. Tactics, you don't allow them to zone off and you do this when the ball is being rushed forward and we had absolutely zero idea about this last season and this was one of the biggest criticisms I had over our coaching. 2. Play heaps of small fast pressure forwards and also do point 1. 3. Make them defend.
I think because of the quality in our midfield and up forward that point 3 may be on the cards for us. Take Geelong this year. They won the premiership with a team that was all about ball winning and hands on the footy and created pressure that way and a forward line that was all about that as well. It defended the forward line by having forwards and ball movement that demanded the defender had to stick tight and defend. Which I think we will have that to a point. What forward can you leave lose and let have a bit more space in our team? None.
I think we could go either way and still be good. Go smaller, play tighter, be all about pressure or go taller, be more about being a scoring threat and make them defend. Same goes for our backline. We could go smaller, be all about run and rebound or go taller and be all about intercepting, pressure in the contest and going fast from the rebound. It all works for us IMO.
The issue you're bringing up is very little about who we had in the team and more about our tactics/coaching. We allowed attacking defenders too much free rope at times. We were cut up by intercept defenders a lot. More about tactics, discipline and lack of voice up forward and more about what our talls were doing with their positioning. I think next season if we tighten up on this and we become more of a scoring threat, make the small defenders defend then we won't have issues here.
Further proof of the decline of western civilisation to my eye.bf36 is in our leadership group on wisdom and thinking things...........
Individually, sure.We're not losing out on defensive pressure with SOS
Recruiting Lemmey is a sign we are not confident in keeping TDK
So we recruited a key forward who had dropped significantly down the rankings due to a poor 2022 because we thought a ruckman was leaving?
May be a bit oblique but if I thought a ruckman was leaving I would have recruited another young ruckman to do an apprenticeship.
Similar to the original bassist of the Damned who moved to lead guitar.Who are you who is so wise in the ways of science?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A bit to unpack there, but if TDK chose to leave and we pick up brother Ben, it could be a bit of a 'win' all around.It's been mentioned that Young could go to that forward/ruck role with DeKoning going out and Ben McKay coming in. McKay can play, we know that, if Young played the forward/ruck role well, better than TDK then this makes us better. Put it this way. McKay is a better CHB than Young and if Young is a better forward/Ruck than DeKoning we go up a level.
How do we get it done? McKay is a free agent, North may match it and force his pay up to extreme levels. That means we might be better off doing it via a trade. North get picks, good picks and we get the player on fair salary, not the inflated salary we would definitely get him via free agency. You're probably looking at two first round picks at least for a prime aged high quality CHB like that. So I think free agency would be avoided.
This would probably leave our genuine ruck depth a little thin though. We would need to pick up a mature ruckman as well.
For mine this was Often due to terrible entries where the opposition had an outnumber and our small were non existent at crumbing the ball on the ground maybe they were getting to high to get back to the fall of the ball ..The issue with this is that we alrrady have two key forwards. Essentially having TDK and SOS on the ground means we lose a small/med forward.
Couple this with starting Walsh at half forward and blending him into midfield reduces spots for genuine forwards further.The issue with this is that we alrrady have two key forwards. Essentially having TDK and SOS on the ground means we lose a small/med forward.
If you recall last season, we were often cut up by opposition half backs who'd wander out of their d50 with zero pressure on them.
So if the TDK/SOS duo isn't scoring and they're costing us going the other way, is it actually viable?
I think it's got to be one or the other.
Don't look past Dylan Moore, UFA
Would be a great get
No doubt part of it, and our inability to combat sides when they went one on one in the middle and made it about pressure as well as a leaky team defence for the early parts of the season. Many issues exposed here, Hawthorn have done that to us for years and years. I think it was more coaching and maturity but who knows, maybe we were a bit tall. Definitely should have been a percentage booster that game. Hawks like all well coached sides of the last 10 years have been good at defending themselves back into games.The win against Hawthorn is hardly an endorsement. 1pt win when we should have had a percentage booster.
If you recall we couldn't combat their slingshot off halfback after being well ahead at quarter time.
The fact that our fwd line wasn't able to provide enough pressure almost cost us the game.
On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app
was thinking this the other day (* off, I think sometimes) cyril was mocked for getting it 9 times a game but hoo boy, the results - I'm happy if motts or durds get it only a handful of times if they are managing a couple of goals and other contributions per game...........
So we recruited a key forward who had dropped significantly down the rankings due to a poor 2022 because we thought a ruckman was leaving?
May be a bit oblique but if I thought a ruckman was leaving I would have recruited another young ruckman to do an apprenticeship.
We have a list spot open now with the Williams news.
Wonder if we add someone now or carry the vacancy through to the mid season draft.
I suspect we’ll go the latter. It’s hugely unfortunate news but we have plenty who can play off half back.