4flagsin5yrs
Premiership Player
indeed, who has actually said this (who might have a legitimate idea)?Out of interest, where has this been stated?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
indeed, who has actually said this (who might have a legitimate idea)?Out of interest, where has this been stated?
indeed, who has actually said this (who might have a legitimate idea)?
I suspect we couldn't afford the $$$$ given our salary cap.
A few weeks ago
Brian Cook on Carlton's list management 'issue' and the push to play more at the MCG
Carlton CEO Brian Cook admits the Blues have an “issue” with list management that needs to be addressed. He also addressed Tom De Koning’s future on 3AW Football before Carlton’s clash with Brisbane on Friday night. Press PLAY below to hear Cook on Carlton’s list Cook also told 3AW Football the...www.3aw.com.au
From last year
Carlton CEO Brian Cook concedes current salary cap squeeze is "challenging but doable" - Tuesday June 28
Carlton CEO Brian Cook spoke about the club's salary cap position, with Tom De Koning, Harry McKay and Charlie Curnow all out of contract at the end of 2023.player.whooshkaa.com
Indeed, he mentions list management issues (faced by most clubs) not salary cap.Cook didn’t say that at all, in either of the interviews.
Cook didn’t say that at all, in either of the interviews.
Indeed, he mentions list management issues (faced by most clubs) not salary cap.
Sorry, Cook referring to list management issues and then stating we need to hit the draft for 2-3 years and forcing us to pick up kids has nothing to do with salary cap issues.
When Cook says, ‘can we keep him on our list considering our top heavy nature’ in relation to TDK after stating he’s a required player must mean we are too tall and not because we have stretched salary cap
When Cook is asked how we keep all our players who command top dollar deals as a list management challenge, again he must be talking about something else other than salary cap.
To then spend the rest of the interview talking about how much to pay players and payment structures and it becoming a challenge, again he mustn’t be talking about the salary cap at all.
You’re off on tangents.
Nobody is suggesting we don’t have cap pressure.
You said “we are maxed out cap wise” and when asked to substantiate, you then proceeded to provide 2 Cook interviews in which he didn’t state that at all.
Every club has cap pressure. That’s the nature of a competition in which you have a cap floor.
Yeah...I'm serious.
Not interested in what journalists have to say. They scream that they want player salaries to be made public and in the meantime they are known to constantly overstate player salaries...and yet we're supposed to believe they have intricate knowledge of club salary caps?
That doesn't sound right to me.
Where did our CEO say we have issues? I must have missed it.
Which say something different to what I initially queried.Im not off on tangents at all. I quoted passages from the interviews.
Your quoted message is above, where you state that you’re not interested in what any journalists have to say and specifically asked where our CEO mentioned we have issues. I have provided you with the interview where he says we have issues.
But all good, focus on the part where he doesn’t use the words ‘maxed out’
Every club has cap pressure?
Didn’t he also say we focussed on the draft last year but also brought in Acres?Yes, some have very little pressure and some have a lot, we have the amount where our CEO states our current position forces us to bring in kids and we will focus on the draft for 2-3 years.
No current season stats available
I'd say Walsh is still young enough (22) to be around long term.The list management issues that are front of mind for Cook and Austin:
- That we carry half a dozen players who have been long contracted to the club that can't get on the park. This damages the club's depth. It takes a couple of other injuries and the list falls apart
- That we drafted poorly for several years or traded out of the pointy end of the draft altogether so that we have precious few players younger than Sam Walsh (drafted in 2018) who are any real quality. This prohibits a self sustaining AFL list
It's all well and good to keep trading in and signing 25+ year Olds to help a flag push for the next few years but after that the club will find itself back to where it was at the end of the 90s early 2000s where almost everyone retires at once
The club will answer the second problem this year and next year to bring in fresh talent to add to Hollands, Motlop and Durdin (the only 3 that are virtual locks to be consistent best 22 players for the next 10-15 years).
The club can simultaneously add a veteran or two to support our winning in the present and near future. These are the types who will replace the injury riddled players.
These are our list management issues.
I'd say Walsh is still young enough (22) to be around long term.
I have take a stab at what I think the players might be on, based on reports in the media, the AFL salary cap is 14mil, so based on these figures I am 3mil over and I thought i was being conservative..Yeah...I'm serious.
Not interested in what journalists have to say. They scream that they want player salaries to be made public and in the meantime they are known to constantly overstate player salaries...and yet we're supposed to believe they have intricate knowledge of club salary caps?
That doesn't sound right to me.
Where did our CEO say we have issues? I must have missed it.
Jsos | 400 |
Dow | 450 |
Jesse | 300 |
LOB | 300 |
Cerra | 700 |
Zac W | 700 |
Kennedy | 500 |
Foagarty | 350 |
Cripps | 900 |
Harry | 850 |
Mitch McGovern | 800 |
TDK | 250 |
Acres | 500 |
Holland | 150 |
Docherty | 500 |
Carrol | 150 |
Kemp | 250 |
Walsh | 800 |
Durdin | 250 |
Plowman | 350 |
Martin | 700 |
Marchbank | 350 |
Weitering | 800 |
Newman | 300 |
Fisher | 300 |
Cowan | 150 |
Pittonet | 300 |
Cunningham | 250 |
Hewett | 400 |
Charlie | 900 |
Lemmey | 150 |
Binns | 150 |
Young | 300 |
Philp | 150 |
Ed | 250 |
Honey | 150 |
Boyd | 150 |
Durdin | 200 |
Cincotta | 150 |
Okeffe | 150 |
Akuei | 150 |
Saad | 600 |
Owies | 250 |
Mirkov | 100 |
Cotterel | 200 |
17000 |
If we can frontend/backend contracts it's possible to stll get the official number to $14mil. Remember we can go under and over by 5% in some circumstances too.I have take a stab at what I think the players might be on, based on reports in the media, the AFL salary cap is 14mil, so based on these figures I am 3mil over and I thought i was being conservative based on all the media reports..
Jsos 400Dow 450Jesse 300LOB 300Cerra 700Zac W 700Kennedy 500Foagarty 350Cripps 900Harry 850Mitch McGovern 800TDK 250Acres 500Holland 150Docherty 500Carrol 150Kemp 250Walsh 800Durdin 250Plowman 350Martin 700Marchbank 350Weitering 800Newman 300Fisher 300Cowan 150Pittonet 300Cunningham 250Hewett 400Charlie 900Lemmey 150Binns 150Young 300Philp 150Ed 250Honey 150Boyd 150Durdin 200Cincotta 150Okeffe 150Akuei 150Saad 600Owies 250Mirkov 100Cotterel 200 17000
For max Holmes they would want TDK and our firstOkay you want him then
Cough up your first rounder and
Big fan of this kid
Max Holmes
190cm 85kg
#20 2020 Draft
Sandringham Dragons
38 games 19 goals
Midfielder/ Forward
Elite speed and endurance
that’s if TDK decides moving on
I have take a stab at what I think the players might be on, based on reports in the media, the AFL salary cap is 14mil, so based on these figures I am 3mil over and I thought i was being conservative based on all the media reports..
Jsos 400Dow 450Jesse 300LOB 300Cerra 700Zac W 700Kennedy 500Foagarty 350Cripps 900Harry 850Mitch McGovern 800TDK 250Acres 500Holland 150Docherty 500Carrol 150Kemp 250Walsh 800Durdin 250Plowman 350Martin 700Marchbank 350Weitering 800Newman 300Fisher 300Cowan 150Pittonet 300Cunningham 250Hewett 400Charlie 900Lemmey 150Binns 150Young 300Philp 150Ed 250Honey 150Boyd 150Durdin 200Cincotta 150Okeffe 150Akuei 150Saad 600Owies 250Mirkov 100Cotterel 200 17000
It’s the sort of list you would see at one of the top sides so it’s abit of a worry in our situation.Absolutely he is. Hopefully another decade.
My point is that the list of quality thins out tremendously after that (that is younger). We have 3 virtual locks for best 22 status younger than him and some players we have a lot of hope in
Contrast that to other clubs and it's a readily identifiable area of need
View attachment 1690318
Agree after cerra and Walsh the rest of the youth are role players at best .. unless lemmey really comes on as a key positionAbsolutely he is. Hopefully another decade.
My point is that the list of quality thins out tremendously after that (that is younger). We have 3 virtual locks for best 22 status younger than him and some players we have a lot of hope in
Contrast that to other clubs and it's a readily identifiable area of need
View attachment 1690318
Martin, made sense at the time, although he had never shown consistent good footy at GC and he has been exactly the same player at Carlton due to injury and form, its more frustrating because what we hoped Martin would become is exactly the type of player we so desperately need.
It's worth pointing out that, similar to Williams, we signed him up to play a role that he didn't play a whole lot at his previous club. We signed him up as a small to medium forward whereas for the Suns he was more of a utility that played different roles most weeks. He was used as an impact forward in bursts/quarters but was never played there consistently as a main position.Martin had had 3 top 3 finishes in F & Bs at GC.
But he's been bitterly disappointing at CFC.
Staggered the Club can't get on top of his repeated soft tissue injuries.
HFF is hard to play. There might be something to this - but atm he just has to STAY FIT!It's worth pointing out that, similar to Williams, we signed him up to play a role that he didn't play a whole lot at his previous club. We signed him up as a small to medium forward whereas for the Suns he was more of a utility that played different roles most weeks. He was used as an impact forward in bursts/quarters but was never played there consistently as a main position.
I'd suggest that when he has looked his best for is us is when he's had short bursts on the ball and has some burst impact there. Aside from the odd qtr or 15 minute periods in games he doesn't look good up forward at all.
Agree! More kids with heart and desire over players looking for a pay day that aren't overly good anyways. Hit the draft hard againNick Watson much like Hollands>LoB this year would be a more impactful pick up than Gresham. Perhaps they'd break even in his first year or maybe Gresham would be slightly ahead, but within 2-3 years Watson will be a better player and cost us far less in cap space.