- Apr 7, 2006
- 1,700
- 5,219
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I 100% agree we can't throw money at anyone even slightly injury prone.You could say we could have gone for Grundy but I doubt we could have competed with Melbourne still, nor would we want to. And hes the same as McGovern anyway, hugely overpriced and injury prone. We just appeared uninterested. I think the club are happy with our rucks as you are. They like Pittonet, they probably see TDK as a rising star, they probably see recruiting someone like Grundy getting in the way of what TDK is becoming and unnecessary spending/trading.
Carlton's salary cap being tight is media driven BS, it's hearsay. The only thing I'm going believe is what came from the club and that was that we had the space for 3 good solid players or 1 star player. Hardly a salary cap issue. I'm going to judge our cap on our behaviour which suggests it's in good shape.
Setterfield was outside our best 22 and we were willing to pay him accordingly. He's best 22 at Essendon and they are willing to pay him accordingly. We also did the right thing by Setterfield by letting him go, which is the club we have become, we have a good reputation which helps us get players. We do the right thing these days.
When we recruited McGovern we had a poor list full of kids. Our issue was meeting the total player payments. The best way to manage it is to recruit players and over pay them. Salary dump. The worst thing to do is spread it over your list or overpay players you already have, that's how teams run into salary cap issues down the track.
The other thing is we are a bottom club. The only way we get good players from other clubs is overpaying.
The system works. You bring in talent overpaid, meet minimum player payments, keep control over the contracts of young up and coming players.
That's what our overpaying was all about and it's worked as intended and in our favour. Evidence is there to see that. Contracts of our big stars have not blown out because of this sort of good management.
Despite recruiting McGovern on a big contract we have still managed to sign all required players and land all targets. We've recruited Betts, Pittonett, Setterfield, Newman, Fogarty, Saad, Martin, Williams, Hewett, Cerra and Acres from other clubs despite McGovern's contract.
For it to be a bad deal or whatever, there needs to be negative ramifications and I'm not seeing any. I'm seeing good list and player contract managing. I'm seeing McGovern as a likely participant in our next premiership. I'm seeing our salary cap continue to upen up and let new recruits in. I'm seeing required players being retained.
None of this logic suggests Stocker should have been retained. Highly doubt Dow is on that sort of money.
Must have been 30%+ of our salary cap out of action on a weekly basis for the past 3 years.