- Nov 14, 2010
- 46,865
- 54,179
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Of course…
Now they need to announce sanders, schoenmaker, callinan all part of ours
And prelisted for free
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More likely Port get stripped of their first rounder for mismanagement of concussion protocols. And then the AFL remembers they don't have a first rounder so they take their first rounder as well as ours off us.Haven’t the dawks been stripped of their first rounder for mismanagement of indigenous players yet
We were never going to get him for free. Clubs wouldn’t allow it.Am I the only one who is less enthusiastic about Sanders if we have to match a bid on him?
I love the kid but I don't want us to use actual draft picks on another midfielder at that stage of the draft.
Big time. But I’ll still take it because I think the kid is a gun. Also the top of this draft seems to be really good and even so I’m prepared to do whatever it takes to get as many top 10 players as possible in this yearAm I the only one who is less enthusiastic about Sanders if we have to match a bid on him?
I love the kid but I don't want us to use actual draft picks on another midfielder at that stage of the draft.
If we can't just prelist him, isn't it reasonable to assume, based on the size of last year's package, we'll at least be given something like an end of 1st round PP?We were never going to get him for free. Clubs wouldn’t allow it.
In the event that we have to match, I’d imagine pre-draft we’ll trade out the Port Pick (so it isn’t absorbed by the bid) then use whatever capital we get in that trade to trade back into the later stages of the first round once the bid is matched.
I'm sure I've seen posts like this from supporters of clubs with Northern Academies. Any time you can get a top 10 pick for a few third rounders you do it. We haven't got enough good players to turn it down.Am I the only one who is less enthusiastic about Sanders if we have to match a bid on him?
I love the kid but I don't want us to use actual draft picks on another midfielder at that stage of the draft.
No no, I agree fully with that sentiment.I'm sure I've seen posts like this from supporters of clubs with Northern Academies. Any time you can get a top 10 pick for a few third rounders you do it. We haven't got enough good players to turn it down.
I wouldn't get my hopes up for more than that.No no, I agree fully with that sentiment.
But if that's the extent of our draft assistance? It's pretty s**t.
Am I the only one who is less enthusiastic about Sanders if we have to match a bid on him?
I love the kid but I don't want us to use actual draft picks on another midfielder at that stage of the draft.
That's pretty much the adjective I'm expecting to use.No no, I agree fully with that sentiment.
But if that's the extent of our draft assistance? It's pretty s**t.
Am I the only one who is less enthusiastic about Sanders if we have to match a bid on him?
I love the kid but I don't want us to use actual draft picks on another midfielder at that stage of the draft.
Assuming we have pick 1+2, we "should/deserve" to get pick 3 priority. To draft Reid, Curtin, Watson.No no, I agree fully with that sentiment.
But if that's the extent of our draft assistance? It's pretty s**t.
No no, I agree fully with that sentiment.
But if that's the extent of our draft assistance? It's pretty s**t.
Yeah this is the crux of my point.But that's a dream. To many louds voices with short memories, speaking against our club. Not enough speaking for it.
On SM-S918B using BigFooty.com mobile app
We were never going to get him for free. Clubs wouldn’t allow it.
In the event that we have to match, I’d imagine pre-draft we’ll trade out the Port Pick (so it isn’t absorbed by the bid) then use whatever capital we get in that trade to trade back into the later stages of the first round once the bid is matched.
it would mean that our assistance is less than what the northern academies are entitled to every year.Yeah this is the crux of my point.
The argument for the past few weeks has been 'instead of giving NMFC a first round priority pick, just let them pre-list Ryley Sanders'.
But now if that has been reduced to 'let them BID on Sanders', if we aren't also getting an end of 1st PP then we are getting absolutely fisted.
Pardon the indulgence, but how do you measure the skilfulness of Sanders against Watson?most skilful footballer in this draft
Croft not nominating F/S would be an interesting development.
I think he'd be pretty high on our list personally.
It's reasonable to hope that we might get a start of second round to bid but there is nothing in the tea leaves to suggest that's going to happen. At this stage, it feels like we are pushing shit uphill just to secure Band 1 for Ben McKay AND access to Sanders with or without us having to match a bid.If we can't just prelist him, isn't it reasonable to assume, based on the size of last year's package, we'll at least be given something like an end of 1st round PP?
So pick 19: 948 pts
Sanders at Pick 7: 1644 pts with 20% NGA discount is 1315 pts
1315 - 948 = 367, or pick 43 (a third rounder).
If that was the case, and putting aside the issue of whether that would be an appropriate draft assistance package overall, a third rounder for any kind of elite draftee is still a pretty damn good deal.