No they haven't. The report is they wanted a replacement.Why? AFC has said that he won't be unless we get Chol.
What if Burgess is being recruited as a forward, and Leek Aleer straight swap for Himmelberg?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No they haven't. The report is they wanted a replacement.Why? AFC has said that he won't be unless we get Chol.
No as it's not over yetSo do we count this now as 12 rumours Busted?
That tells me Oliver is still on!
Burgess is probably coming to replace him. We'll bring in someone else for defensive depth.
Of course it should be if the deciding factor is often length of contract to reduce the yearly salary.Interesting part further down in that article:
LEAGUE TO PONDER COMPENSATION CHANGESTHE AFL is set to assess whether it begins to consider the length of a contract in its free agency compensation formula.Currently, while a restricted free agent must be offered a minimum two-year deal to trigger free agency compensation, the final length of the contract is not a factor in deciphering which band is triggered.It means that, hypothetically, a three-year deal activates the same band of free agency compensation as a five-year contract provided the financial terms across the offer are the same.But, while it will not be introduced ahead of this year's free agency window that opens on Friday, the League is pondering whether the length of a contract becomes part of its formula in deciding free agency compensation in the future.The AFL currently has a detailed points-based formula that decides free agency compensation, which considers a range of factors including the financial terms of the deal and the age of the player moving clubs among others.Clubs losing players are made aware of the compensation being offered with 24 hours of a restricted free agency deal being lodged, with that package then made official if a choice is made not to match a rival club's bid.
Clubs are not allowed to alter the terms of any restricted free agency deal throughout the life of its contract. – Riley Beveridge
Hawks offering 4 years .. I think read somewhere Adelaide offered 3. Perhaps they just decided he wasn't worth getting into an auction over“Pulled out” or he just chose the Hawks?
Typical Crows, lose McAdam, Doedee and Berg and get nothing much back.
I wouldn't trust Chol in an AFL grand final to perform.Hawks offering 4 years .. I think read somewhere Adelaide offered 3. Perhaps they just decided he wasn't worth getting into an auction over
We still need to draft at least one tall, preferably a ruck. Toby Pink was mentioned as defensive cover too.We'll probably use Burgess for both. Seeing we have Gollant as our preferred KPF depth option.
Perfectly happy to lose those three.Just a normal off-season for us.
He performed in the VFL Grandfinal??I wouldn't trust Chol in an AFL grand final to perform.
I wouldn't trust Chol in an AFL grand final to perform.
We still have a few Frampton's in our team too.I wouldn't trust Chol in an AFL grand final to perform.
That's why I said AFL.He performed in the VFL Grandfinal??
Doesn't matter now as he's going to Hawthorn
Nickname gastro. Both ends.We'll probably use Burgess for both. Seeing we have Gollant as our preferred KPF depth option.
We still have a few Frampton's in our team too.
They’ll make the change after Doedee signing with Brisbane, but before McKay signing with Essendon.Interesting part further down in that article:
LEAGUE TO PONDER COMPENSATION CHANGESTHE AFL is set to assess whether it begins to consider the length of a contract in its free agency compensation formula.Currently, while a restricted free agent must be offered a minimum two-year deal to trigger free agency compensation, the final length of the contract is not a factor in deciphering which band is triggered.It means that, hypothetically, a three-year deal activates the same band of free agency compensation as a five-year contract provided the financial terms across the offer are the same.But, while it will not be introduced ahead of this year's free agency window that opens on Friday, the League is pondering whether the length of a contract becomes part of its formula in deciding free agency compensation in the future.The AFL currently has a detailed points-based formula that decides free agency compensation, which considers a range of factors including the financial terms of the deal and the age of the player moving clubs among others.Clubs losing players are made aware of the compensation being offered with 24 hours of a restricted free agency deal being lodged, with that package then made official if a choice is made not to match a rival club's bid.
Clubs are not allowed to alter the terms of any restricted free agency deal throughout the life of its contract. – Riley Beveridge
How would we swing that?No they haven't. The report is they wanted a replacement.
What if Burgess is being recruited as a forward, and Leek Aleer straight swap for Himmelberg?
GWS want Himmelberg.How would we swing that?
Come on folks ..They’ll make the change after Doedee signing with Brisbane, but before McKay signing with Essendon.
Do I really need to point out I was joking?Come on folks ..
"But, while it will not be introduced ahead of this year's free agency window that opens on Friday, the League is pondering whether the length of a contract becomes part of its formula in deciding free agency compensation in the future."
Leek Aleer was a pick 15 in the 2021 draft, you think they’ll give him up for Berg?GWS want Himmelberg.