List Mgmt. 2023 Trade & List Management Thread II - Goldy&Bucket➡️✅/'24 EoFR & #44➡️Stephens&#25✅/#21&#25➡️Fisher&#17✅/'24 EoFR➡️#18✅

[Lore]

Hello Shinboners!

The embedded resources below are kept up to date by the trade board mods (as much as possible – we are human after all). Enjoy!

Spoiler: 2023 Draft Order

Spoiler: 2024 Draft Order, aka Future Picks

Spoiler: Blue Tick Rumours

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

Disagree no way the Dogs offer 3 first rounds picks for pick 5, that is insane and they could very well just miss the finals again next year

We don’t know how desperate they are though.

 

[Sphynx]

I daresay we're waiting to see what happens with the Richmond job too, might be hard for McQualter to go back if he misses.

Surely Clarkson has picked up the phone to Trent Cotchin too.

I wouldn't mind an assistant that has been under Hardwick tbh.

McRae and Kingsley's playing styles are both excellent.

 

[Psicosis]

I don’t see us beating the Dogs offer with their additional future first being involved.

I don't see them offering a future first as well.

 

[Shinboner1]

I don’t see us beating the Dogs offer with their additional future first being involved.

then we bid on croft with one of our first picks.

 

[Makeshift Park]

then we bid on croft with one of our first picks.

I don't think he's nominating as a father-son.

 

[The Filth Wizard]

If Croft doesn’t nominate them it makes not much sense to do that deal at all.

Does he have to by trade week? It might be something that’s done in live trading.

 

[Sphynx]

I don't see them offering a future first as well.

I think that's a bit of a mistake from the journo's imo.

Either way, I'd love to know who the player is we are wanting to move up for with the GC pick.

Has to be one of Watson, Curtin or O'Sullivan imo.

 

[Daniltchenko You Beauty]

I'd be more than happy to get the F1 involved. Send the club a message that we're going to improve next year.

It's all mids at the top next year anyway.

 

[Better Loosen Up]

I think that's a bit of a mistake from the journo's imo.

Either way, I've love to know who the player is we are wanting to move up for with the GC pick.

Has to be one of Watson, Curtin or O'Sullivan imo.

Question is, who are the dogs after so desperately with that pick to give up 3 first rounders?

 

[Psicosis]

I'd be more than happy to get the F1 involved. Send the club a message that we're going to improve next year.

It's all mids at the top next year anyway.

Would send a great message when we are bottom four next year without our first round pick

 

[Sphynx]

Question is, who are the dogs after so desperately with that pick to give up 3 first rounders?

McKercher or Sanders imo.

They haven't taken a midfielder in 6 years, it's not often you can potentially get the best pure mid in the draft at #5, but there's a chance this year.

 

[Makeshift Park]

So if WCE want too much for pick 1, and GC want too much for pick 4, but the FA compo and PP occur as reported, what's the consensus?

Something like this?

2 - Mckercher
3 - Watson
11 - Croft
14 - M Edwards

 

[DocSholl]

Would prefer Dow over Fisher. Read an article yesterday dating a few years ago talks about his Grandfather playing 18 games for North. Grew up a North supporter, Archer was his idol.

At least Fisher has exposed afl form at half back.

Taking out the romance I'm struggling to see what Dow would add to our list. He's an inside clearance mid.

 

[Del191229]

I heard something on SEN today along the lines of they pay BMac 500 x 5 but with triggers…….triggers cant be included in compo. Would not surprise to see Hawks outsmart us.

Then we match lol.

 

[Merlin007]

I'd be more than happy to get the F1 involved. Send the club a message that we're going to improve next year.

It's all mids at the top next year anyway.

With potentially 4 picks inside 15 this year, I can't see us trading out of next year. If everything falls into place as expected, we're in a stellar position already, so no need to undermine our situation next year to improve it still further

 

[Better Loosen Up]

McKercher or Sanders imo.

They haven't taken a midfielder in 6 years, it's not often you can potentially get the best pure mid in the draft at #5, but there's a chance this year.

Surely they wouldn't be thinking that we'd be passing up on McKercher. Or at least I hope we aren't!

 

[Flawed Genius]

Taking out the romance I'm struggling to see what Dow would add to our list. He's an inside clearance mid.

It would make me right. And as we all know that is the most important thing.

 

[Merlin007]

Then we match lol.

Correct; the whole point of FA for the recruiting club is they don't want to spend draft capital to get a player.

None of Swans, Hawks or * want to trade for McKay, they have no incentive to try and stooge the contract to minimise compensation as it will only encourage a match

 

[DocSholl]

It would make me right. And as we all know that is the most important thing.

He's not Silvagni and he never will be

 

[GS WARRIORS]

I think that's a bit of a mistake from the journo's imo.

Either way, I'd love to know who the player is we are wanting to move up for with the GC pick.

Has to be one of Watson, Curtin or O'Sullivan imo.

Or Sanders since we won't get him free. AFL may have said, we can't give you Sanders but we can give you 11 and F1. You can trade that to GC and select him.

 

[Flawed Genius]

He's not Silvagni and he never will be

Why did you have to bring him up. It's still so raw

 

[joegreen]

Or Sanders since we won't get him free. AFL may have said, we can't give you Sanders but we can give you 11 and F1. You can trade that to GC and select him.

Would you call that creative?

 

[Daniltchenko You Beauty]

I don't see why we'd go Sanders unless we get him at a discount. So many more important positions to fill in a rare draft that isn't stacked with mids at the top.

 

[Souup]

Souup roos_fanatic08 with 2, 3, 5 - who do you both take?

Best available would be:

2 - Mckercher (I have Sanders rated slightly higher but if we're going midfielder then we need Mckercher's type more)
3 - Watson
5 - Sanders

What I would do:
2 - Mckercher
3 - Watson
5 - O'Sullivan/Caddy

 

[GS WARRIORS]

Would you call that creative?

If GC agree or have agreed, then it's given us our request at the same time not changing any of their rules. That would be smart.