List Mgmt. 2023 Trade & List Management Thread II - Goldy&Bucket➡️✅/'24 EoFR & #44➡️Stephens&#25✅/#21&#25➡️Fisher&#17✅/'24 EoFR➡️#18✅

[Lore]

Hello Shinboners!

The embedded resources below are kept up to date by the trade board mods (as much as possible – we are human after all). Enjoy!

Spoiler: 2023 Draft Order

Spoiler: 2024 Draft Order, aka Future Picks

Spoiler: Blue Tick Rumours

 

[Disco Dew]

In the bottom right scenario we are giving up 2 & 10 for Pick 1. But really we are giving up 2,10, 14 & F19. That is a too higher price to pay and I’ll be pretty filthy if we did that.

Well really we’d be giving up 2, 14 and F19 right? We’ve just packaged up those last two for 10. It’s not actually a cost of 4 picks… and with that F19 being handed to us for being shit I’m much less attached to it so for me it’s 2 and 14. I don’t hate it on face value but I expect the eagles will want more than 2 and 10. So they can get ****ed tbh

 

[New_Roo]

The interviewer asked him about McDonald, maybe a bid of a false impression given, but he did say he was a number of WA based players they are keeping an eye on

I have heard the lmac interest elsewhere


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[krakouers]

I have heard the lmac interest elsewhere


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Certain they would

 

[Masked Avenger]

The Bulldogs have literally sold the farm to kick and scratch their way to pick 4 which is likely to be Pick 6 on draft night.

Says heaps about the goldmine we're sitting on with picks 2 & 3 if Band 1 comes through.

Regardless of how good Reid is, he won't match the combined grunt of selections 2 & 3.

 

[Hearts to hearts]

View attachment 1826932

The club’s name is NORTH MELBOURNE you w***ers.

 

[ajd9 roo]

The club’s name is NORTH MELBOURNE you w***ers.

Even put us in alphabetical order for 'North Melbourne' but proceeded to put 'Kangaroos' like a bunch of f***ing amateurs!

 

[roos_tt29]

The Bulldogs have literally sold the farm to kick and scratch their way to pick 4 which is likely to be Pick 6 on draft.

Says heaps about the goldmine we're sitting on with picks 2 & 3 if Band 1 comes through.

Regardless of how good Reid is, he won't match the combined grunt of selections 2 & 3.

Look how 2 and 3 worked out this year and for the Dees when they did it. The sum of the parts are usually greater than the individual.
We're in a great spot this year in terms of the draft.

 

[Disco Dew]

Regardless of how good Reid is, he won't match the combined grunt of selections 2 & 3.

Correct. Thats why if a trade for 1 does happen we need to hang onto 3 as that would be insanely good

 

[New_Roo]

Well really we’d be giving up 2, 14 and F19 right? We’ve just packaged up those last two for 10. It’s not actually a cost of 4 picks… and with that F19 being handed to us for being s**t I’m much less attached to it so for me it’s 2 and 14. I don’t hate it on face value but I expect the eagles will want more than 2 and 10. So they can get ****ed tbh

Yes abit more logic in that.... we were given the pp to use and in that scenario we have chosen to use them to assist with getting pick 1...


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[New_Roo]

Look how 2 and 3 worked out this year and for the Dees when they did it. The sum of the parts are usually greater than the individual.
We're in a great spot this year in terms of the draft.

Agree but also need to take into consideration your list too.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Orange Peanut]

Look how 2 and 3 worked out this year and for the Dees when they did it. The sum of the parts are usually greater than the individual.
We're in a great spot this year in terms of the draft.

So wouldn't 1 and 3 be slightly better?

 

[William Caresser]

In fairness, he hasn't played in any of those positions other than onball.

I don't think it's fair to list those as a strength of McKercher when he's never played there or demonstrated any performances there.

He certainly has attributes which would lend themselves to those positions, he's going as a top 3 pick because he's a center square midfielder that averages over 30 possessions and a goal a game.

The best players in under age who can play on ball, invariably do play on ball. However, very few of them are played on ball straight away at AFL level. Most are put on flanks or the wing and a number struggle because they lack attributes. Not McKercher - he has the attributes to play in a variety of positions and that is a key consideration for scouts even if they played mainly on ball at under age.

 

[DuckYeah]

Freo want Lmac? Where do we sign?

 

[krakouers]

Freo want Lmac? Where do we sign?

Sorry to kill your happiness there DuckYeah but wrong McDonald
They are chasing Ronald to co sponsor their side and give players McFranchises

 

[HEYTRUEROO]

Freo want Lmac? Where do we sign?

Fairly sure the LMac they're after is Logan

 

[roos_tt29]

So wouldn't 1 and 3 be slightly better?

Depends who you want in that top 3. If you can get the same players at 2 and 3 then maybe not

 

[New_Roo]

Freo want Lmac? Where do we sign?

I said mark II don't get excited


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[shinboner magic]

Sorry to kill your happiness there DuckYeah but wrong McDonald
They are chasing Ronald to co sponsor their side and give players McFranchises

We just have to get the swans on side and do a sleight of hand - get Stephens to us and send Luke to freo thinking they’re getting Logan.

 

[Smoocher]

Is the captain average then?

Barely anything between them this season and Jy plays about 10% more game time.

When Will has a fully developed tank, he will blow past him as a midfielder.

View attachment 1826935

The captain will be pushed to a wing/half forward/mid rotation if we can get enough bona fide A grade midfielders.

I'm praying that Wardlaw can overcome injuries and that TT decides to stay.

That will give us an A grade midfield.

Sent from my CPH2197 using Tapatalk

 

[New_Roo]

The Bulldogs have literally sold the farm to kick and scratch their way to pick 4 which is likely to be Pick 6 on draft.

Says heaps about the goldmine we're sitting on with picks 2 & 3 if Band 1 comes through.

Regardless of how good Reid is, he won't match the combined grunt of selections 2 & 3.

And then Barrett said look how much was required for pick 4 so that sets the std for pick 1.... what a load of crap!


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Smoocher]

In the bottom right scenario we are giving up 2 & 10 for Pick 1. But really we are giving up 2,10, 14 & F19. That is a too higher price to pay and I’ll be pretty filthy if we did that.

Agree, take 2,3 and trade up for 10.

Let eagles have the one quality pick as they will not trade with anyone else and risk dropping to pick 4 or 5.

North actually holds the power if pick 3 is given to us.

At best we give 2 and 19.

Sent from my CPH2197 using Tapatalk

 

[Better Loosen Up]

If you don’t think 2 and 10 is enough, you don’t need to add 14. Use PPs or…

NM out: 2, 10 & LMac (incl. salary?)
NM in: 1

NM: 1, 3, 14, 19, 20 (PP)

NM get Harley Reid with onfield leadership upgrade and still have 5x first round picks, WC get 2x top ten picks and a player they’ve coveted for 10 years.

Yeah but how good does 2, 3, 10, 14, 19, 20 (PP) look!

 

[New_Roo]

Yeah but how good does 2, 3, 10, 14, 19, 20 (PP) look!

Might look good but we wont be taking 6 picks to the draft!


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[JGreezy]

And then Barrett said look how much was required for pick 4 so that sets the std for pick 1.... what a load of crap!


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Look how much was required for pick 4, so that sets the standard for pick 2. Trading 2 and 14 for 1 is like trading 5 first rounders based on that.

 

[Passmore]

And then Barrett said look how much was required for pick 4 so that sets the std for pick 1.... what a load of crap!


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

I think we can all agree that Barrett talks shit.

Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk