Should have thought through my request more- wouldn't want you to do anything that'd disadvantage the club, you or the other ITKs!
I appreciate the sentiment all the same*
*my DMs are open
-
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Ultimate Glory 2023 Trade speculation and Shinbeggars discussion
- Thread starter Strapping Young Lad
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
I appreciate the sentiment all the same*
*my DMs are open
KeeperLeaguer
Fantasy Footy Guru
Yeah I deleted my earlier post. TP had a very valid point and I was probably getting a bit ahead of myself.
Sleepy Mark tell GC they’re dreaming for a F2 pick.
Dimma doesn’t want Chol, their list manager came out today concerned about their salary cap. In no way do they require him.
They have no legs to stand on. Give them a 3rd or 4th rounder and move on
Dimma doesn’t want Chol, their list manager came out today concerned about their salary cap. In no way do they require him.
They have no legs to stand on. Give them a 3rd or 4th rounder and move on
spudmaster
Brownlow Medallist
cyrilicious
Team Captain
- Apr 3, 2014
- 422
- 958
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
I'd give pick 4 and a future 1st for Hodge any day of the week
I don’t think West Coast will get desperate at all, North might though. If the eagles hold firm in wanting 2 and 3, North might cave.
If they pass, West Coast could just call the hawks and agree to 4 and F1.. Or take Reid.
If they keep it, we get one of Duursma, Watson, McKercher, or Curtin, and keep our F1.
If they trade for 2 and 3, we’ll get Duursma.
Or they trade with us and we get Reid.
There’s no losing situation here, we’ll either get Reid or a top end talent and another next year.
killerspud
Premiership Player
- Aug 23, 2009
- 4,599
- 11,571
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
If Norf go 2, 15 and a F1 WCE should take that and run
They get their man another top 15 and will probably have pick 1 and 2 next year
- Mar 21, 2017
- 5,261
- 13,438
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- BayernMunchen
Would love to get Harley! Pick four and future first is a good swap . The Dee's have 6 + 11 so, not really compatible . North maybe trump us with pick three + future first which will be pick two or three. If they put that on the table, then the eagles take that.
- Nov 10, 2022
- 11,449
- 9,367
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
* losing two players in PSD. Make it so
Chief might need a few more servers that night
Chief might need a few more servers that night
I’d say North have three picks better than our best pick. Their F1 is likely another top 2. North will sort out a trade, it’s a matter of whether it’s one of those three pieces plus other picks or whether West Coast can squeeze two of them
wahawk
Norm Smith Medallist
Eagles will want pick 2 in any swap with beggars
They’ll want to be guaranteed of getting Curtin.
They’ll want to be guaranteed of getting Curtin.
Shhhhhh... mate.
There are Eagle & North spies here.
cryptor
Brownlow Medallist
- May 11, 2008
- 24,846
- 65,219
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
100%.
Unless North agree to 2 + 3 before deadline then I reckon Eagles sit on pick 1 until draft night and then take the best of one of these 'in principle' deals (maybe some later pick swaps) in order:
1. North: 2 + 3
2. North: 2 + F1
3. Hawks: 4 + F1
Dees from what I understand are keen too but I'm not sure what they've offered so far. Presumably at least 6 + 11 + F1 which would still be behind us in my estimation.
That said, if I were the Eagles I'd be taking Reid and then offering F1 for every live pick while Curtin is still on the board.
The Seaword
Senior List
- Mar 28, 2022
- 186
- 515
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
And my first born, the mrs, the boat, the car and the golf clubs
Mercy Seat
Norm Smith Medallist
It feels we’re playing down our interest in this publicly to minimise what Lions think we can get out of us. Surely we’ve been talking to Jack about this for some time and it’ll end up being something like a swap of 4th rounders to get it done.
There is so much wrong with this, I'm not sure where to start. But given it's David King, it's hardly surprising.
“They just moved him on for this exact reason,” King said of Gunston’s move at the end of 2022.
“Those guys (O’Meara, Gunston, Mitchell) if they’re there, would be playing 12, 15, 18 games a year and holding up the Newcombes and the Days who are frontliners now in this rebuild.
“I think someone needs to sit down with Jack Gunston … he doesn’t want to go to a club that’s rebuilding because there’s no point investing the games into Jack rather than the kids"
We didn't want to move him on. He requested and it seems like Sam and co reluctantly agreed.
Gunston isn't taking games off Newcome and Day. Stupid throwing his name in with JOM and Mitchell. We don't have the forward depth like we do in the midfield where we're trying to fast track the kids.
Maybe Jack is satisfied with where his career is at and is happy on a 1 or 2 year contract and with x amount of games a year while mentoring younger players.
unitedhawk
Team Captain
Correct.
However, I agree with eveything else Kingy said. I may be in a minority here but I'd rather not have Jack, whom I love as much as any other Hawk, taking up a spot in the 23 - or on the list for that matter - at the expense of a young prospect.
That said, if Sam reckons otherwise, I'll back our coach in 100%.
KeeperLeaguer
Fantasy Footy Guru
Yeah David is clearly posting his usual offal. He's posting a purely opinionated piece that bears little relation to reality.
We would love to get Jack back for even a half-season of games for his teachings alone. Not an emotional decision, a pragmatic one.
arupist
Premium Platinum
You can't do that. It's inhuman. You have to keep the golf clubs.
spudmaster
Brownlow Medallist
Those were lost in the divorce.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Sticky
- Locked
