It's not like Ebert v danger.FO'S and Lalor should both be ranked higher than Draper in terms of what Adelaide actually need in the midfield.
We need bust speed and power but we also need great footskills and cool under pressure a good decision maker
I agree that the Lalor v Draper is similar to Dangerfield v Ebert.
It's almost the most interesting pick we've had, there are so many options as the talent is so even at the top of the draft, nothing is clear cut
Ebert was more vanilla than Draper. I haven't been Draper's biggest fan early in the year, but watching him in the Sanfl he's anything but vanilla. Has risen to sanfl league in terms of contested game and shown he's able to evade and burst away from the contest at the same time. He's a pure on baller and one with elite agility and very good speed.
I would be happy with Lalor over Draper, but I think we're finally in a position to grab a very good mid with our first pick. O'Sullivan looks high end too and then there's Travaglia.
Only one in not sure about is Smillie. Very big dude but I don't think he actually uses it that well against u18s. Not like Tom Green for example. Lacks a bit of class to overcome that imo.
I've been very wrong on drafts though so we'll see (will hang my hat on will day though)