List Mgmt. 2024 AFL Draft - November 20-21 (Picks 13, 29, 36, 50, 94, 112, 130)

[Ford Fairlane]

Thanks to Lore for this great resource

 

[avs]

That shit was from Crowies Media . Kangas will be stupid not to do with Richmond in this strong draft rather than taking stink from crowes next year .

 

[avs]

Richmond are very interested in him at any of their picks between 18 and 24. He's got plenty of interest with Dogs and Richmond the ones with most. Would say 23 is the latest he'll go by could also go as early as 17. If he slips to 30 that'd be a steal.

Richmond are very interested in him at any of their picks between 18 and 24. He's got plenty of interest with Dogs and

Richmond are very interested in him at any of their picks between 18 and 24. He's got plenty of interest with Dogs and Richmond the ones with most. Would say 23 is the latest he'll go by could also go as early as 17. If he slips to 30 that'd be a steal.

Dogs are not interested in him . Check their board . Because thy reckon he is too slow at junior level and would not stand a chance at AFL level . The reckon it will be waste of pick to spend on slow player .

 

[Addy23]

That shit was from Crowies Media . Kangas will be stupid not to do with Richmond in this strong draft rather than taking stink from crowes next year .

That article is also wrong because Crows don't have a future 2nd!

 

[Addy23]

Dogs are not interested in him . Check their board . Because thy reckon he is too slow at junior level and would not stand a chance at AFL level . The reckon it will be waste of pick to spend on slow player .

Lol what BigFooty board thinks is usually not the same as what recruiters think. BigFooty only rates people by speed if you're not a tall and contested marking abilities if you're a tall. It's like the worst indicator ever.

 

[Addy23]

Dogs are not interested in him . Check their board . Because thy reckon he is too slow at junior level and would not stand a chance at AFL level . The reckon it will be waste of pick to spend on slow player .

By their logic Jake Stringer wouldn't have been a good player at AFL level.

 

[avs]

By their logic Jake Stringer wouldn't have been a good player at AFL level.

I checked few days ago . I reckon it was page 54 and was not getting much love there. But their fans base may have good or bad opinions about Haynes .

 

[Addy23]

I am assuming given we haven't nominated the F/S boys that we are targetting someone with a rookie pick.

My targets would be Polkinghorne and Ravenhill for KPF, Eastham and Toner for tall forwards. Hargrave and Luke Kennedy for mids. If we really wanted a HB I'd just take Burgoyne or Montgomery.

 

[Addy23]

I checked few days ago . I reckon it was page 54 and was not getting much love there. But their fans base may have good or bad opinions about Haynes .

Yeah my point more so is that to most people, speed is the most important criteria in a player. Till my last day, I'll never see it that way. For me, disposal efficiency (in a positive way not backwards), ability to break tackles and ability to find space is superior. Speed is important for sure, but if someone has average speed like Hynes does, to go with the other attributes I've mentioned, they're a target for me. Especially in our midfield where we have lots of speed.

If I'm alone on this hill, so be it haha. Some of the best players in our game don't have breakaway speed