Discussion 2024 General AFL Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Would legitimately love to see behind the smokey curtain mirrors to see who instigated this, and how it progressed to this point.
Please.



5160.jpg
 
At least things are now much simpler. Take Sean Darcy for instance - instead of saying he's 110 KG, we can now just all call him a fat campaigner :)

"And fat bastard with the tap to that skinny bloke who hands off to pudgy, and wait, lardarse with a cracking tackle..."

The comms would be lit, BT back in form like no ones business just screaming about guts consistently.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Would legitimately love to see behind the smokey curtain mirrors to see who instigated this, and how it progressed to this point.

I reckon it'll mainly be an AFLPA thing. They're the ones who refuse to allow publication of exact salaries, I think if they had their way they wouldn't want any info about players out there at all.
 
I reckon it'll mainly be an AFLPA thing. They're the ones who refuse to allow publication of exact salaries, I think if they had their way they wouldn't want any info about players out there at all.
I’d hate to think that was the case, but with dAnGeR leading the charge, anything is possible.

What’s next, not display height so the short kings manlets don’t get in a tizz. We all have eyes ffs.
 
I’d hate to think that was the case, but with dAnGeR leading the charge, anything is possible.

What’s next, not display height so the short kings manlets don’t get in a tizz. We all have eyes ffs.
What’s next is a Lionel Rose type fighting a Mike Tyson type for a world championship boxing title in the woke weight division.
 
Would legitimately love to see behind the smokey curtain mirrors to see who instigated this, and how it progressed to this point.
I think it's just an easy way to remove one of the differences between the AFL and the AFLW. AFLW have never published weights. Some people have mentioned this difference, I reckon it's 100% because of the AFLW.
 
Did you really need to write that ?
Anyway i don't see how it matters when he took it , if its in your system its in your system .
Its like someone saying they haven't had a drink in 12 hours but your still over the limit , anyway i guess we just wait and see what happens
The point is that if its in your system and it is enhancing your performance on the day of competition then it doesn't matter when you take it.

However if its in your system and it isn't enhancing your performance on the day of competition then it does matter when you took it.

There is limited evidence that cocaine is performance enhancing on the day you take it and there's even less evidence to suggest it is performance enhancing three days after you've taken it even though it will still be detectable in your system.

The Smith case will be really important for the AFL and the AFLPA in relation to how the review of the AFL drugs policy plays out.

If he does end up with 2+ years then the current three strikes policy is dead in the water and the AFL could no longer show any leniency for any player testing positive to Substances of Abuse (aka - recreational drugs) irrespective of whether its their first strike or not.
 
Tom Lamb doing well for himself post footy, got the fresh head shave going and looking swole lifting heavy


1000004870.jpg
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I think it's just an easy way to remove one of the differences between the AFL and the AFLW. AFLW have never published weights. Some people have mentioned this difference, I reckon it's 100% because of the AFLW.
100%
 
What actually happened Joff? Have a vague memory of something happening.
Sacked by Hutchinson, along with Bartlett, and Rohan Connelly.
SEN lost 9.2 million last year and has had to sell its NZ assets.

On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Discussion 2024 General AFL Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top