ferrisb
Brownlow Medallist
That's terrible.looks like it's ginnivan beginagan...
You're going home in the back of a Ginnivan...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's terrible.looks like it's ginnivan beginagan...
Depends who is there. If there's someone we really like who slides, take the 3rd ND pick.There is roughly 4 months or so until the SSP closes, I’d just take the risk we might get an injury and take the extra player at the draft.
That's terrible.
You're going home in the back of a Ginnivan...
Hollandseseses.What will all the posters sticking an apostrophe in Hollands do now that there are two of them? What's the plural of Hollands? Holland's's? Hollandses? Important questions need answers!
There's been no announcement of a change to Cat B rules, so currently, one of the Irish has to be listed as Cat A, even though they are Cat B.Do we have confirmation on the list makeup, especially Cat B’s (3 allowed?)?
(3) Cat B: Akuei, Duffy, Monahan
(6) Cat A: 37, 38, 39, 40, 45, 46
(32) Main list: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 40, 31, 32, 33, 42, 44 + EH
Upgrade or two ahead.
Even Ollie cracks in pretty hard for a skinny rookie.The team we’ve developed now is a contested beast compared to what we had 3/5 years ago.
Outside O Hollands who is still developing the rest of the side are animals.I mean that in a good way of course.
Give us all of the Hollandseseses my preciousss...Hollandseseses.
Pretty sure...
There's been no announcement of a change to Cat B rules, so currently, one of the Irish has to be listed as Cat A, even though they are Cat B.
So unless there is a change, we have to elevate 1 Rookie to the Senior List, and we have 3 spots available.
Cat B may have changed, but it hasn't been announced anywhere that I've seen.View attachment 1836213
Pom seems to have pretty knowledge from my limited insight, above are his numbers with mis-information about our Irish recruiting and they’ll both be Cat B.
I was of the same opinion as you re: Cat B x 3 (Grinspoon tune) but seems we may be able to have both without adjusting our other list categories. List was capped at 44 after the AFL COVID reduction, with our makeup of 36/6/2
Pre EH I thinkCat B may have changed, but it hasn't been announced anywhere that I've seen.
We also have 32 on the senior list, not 31.
Yeah, he seemed pretty certain about it as well. It's a bit of a dog's brekky, the ol' Cat B.View attachment 1836213
Pom seems to have pretty knowledge from my limited insight, above are his numbers with mis-information about our Irish recruiting and they’ll both be Cat B.
I was of the same opinion as you re: Cat B x 3 (Grinspoon tune) but seems we may be able to have both without adjusting our other list categories. List was capped at 44 after the AFL COVID reduction, with our makeup of 36/6/2
This is from the Feb 2023 doc:
View attachment 1832514
It's really poorly worded - prob a factor of multiple revisions over time. Here's the App. 1 detail mentioned above:
View attachment 1832517
Clearly, here it spells out a maximum of 2 Cat-B rookies, with a maximum list size of 44. I don't believe that 10.1(b) is saying that you can have 2 more than this, though perhaps it could be interpreted that way. It's just repeating that you can have 2 Cat-B players (beyond Cat-A).
Further, "Ireland" is only mentioned once in the document, in the definition of "International Development Region".
View attachment 1832526
So an Irish player is an "International Player", but is not part of an "International Development Region".
Also - "International Development Region" isn't relevant to the Rookie List discussion, it relates only to a separate International Scholarship List that clubs may set up.
At least we got 46 games of finals winning footy in this team and none of that experience leftBest trade since bell, Henderson, yarran and Gibbs trades.
Hollands trade is like getting a top shelf wine 80% off because it had a scratch on the label. Looks a great prospect, and fits needs - A+
Disappointing to once again see no winning experience come in. Maybe the ship has sailed on it now for this list, they will have to become winners themselves.
Do we have confirmation on the list makeup, especially Cat B’s (3 allowed?)?
(3) Cat B: Akuei, Duffy, Monahan
(6) Cat A: 37, 38, 39, 40, 45, 46
(32) Main list: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 40, 31, 32, 33, 42, 44 + EH
Upgrade or two ahead.
Agree.reckon we looked cooked, having to win what, 13 out of 14 matches?
to improve we need to stop losing 'easy' games (essendon and saints games early in the season for example) and get a top 4 spot.
even so, i still think luck played it's part, if we'd played Collingwood, not Brisbane i think we were a very, very good chance to go through to the GF, on emotion as much as quality.
handshake agreement?Id give my left arm to get Toby across
No current season stats available