But that was because that campaigner silvagni manipulated him.This guy isn’t going to be coming on rookie wages. It’ll be multi year $400k minimum. Guy is a mercenary. Just look at how he got to Carlton.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But that was because that campaigner silvagni manipulated him.This guy isn’t going to be coming on rookie wages. It’ll be multi year $400k minimum. Guy is a mercenary. Just look at how he got to Carlton.
It’s sounding as though we are considering him for SSP like Sharp. I don’t have a problem with him on rookie list. As for training the SSP starts from beginning of December so they will be able to get a few weeks of training done before they consider selecting. If ends up like that St Kilda bloke blowing his hammy whist training then we can tell him sorry.Surely if we are looking at Martin it would be for the very last spot on the list and he trains over the summer with other potential candidates and IF he is injury free and performs better than the others we select him in the SSP. Doesn’t that mean he gets a rookie contract?
That’s really the only scenario where I like the idea.
Jack Martin's performance on field is very much rated by those who observe him closely. He came in 6th in Carltoon's B&F year before last.I think I’d rather have Emmett on our list than Martin tbh.
Firstly I don’t think Martin is rated because of on field performance. It’s because he was a high draft pick ten years ago - that’s irrelevant.
Then throw in that our forward pressure is the worst in the league. At least Emmett if he’s player 28-30 on our list provides that.
Then throw in Martin’s history with injuries.
Then throw in the age of both players.
Will admit if we knew the world was ending end of 2025 and we had one year to win a flag Martin would be the better option. He’s a more talented footballer for sure but I think Emmett could still be around in 4-5 years if he’s good enough - if he doesn’t improve and gets delisted that’s okay but Martin is a one year prospect every year with the best case scenario probably getting two years from him.
Carlton have a tight cap and Martin asked them to be delistedI suspect when Carlton realised we were cooling on him and would have only got chip for him they decided to cut him. QLD clubs would only take him for free.
I think the people who don't rate Martin are ones who haven't watched him, this would be due to injuries, hard to watch him when he isn't out there.
He is definitely a good player, can take a mark overhead for his size, nice kick, footy smarts.
If he didn't pass the medical then that's fine, don't grab him.
As a swing that only takes up salary, he is perfect for us, make it a games incentivised contract if we must but get him in IMO
Firstly I don’t think Martin is rated because of on field performance. It’s because he was a high draft pick ten years ago - that’s irrelevant.
Think we'd just rather the picks and cap space. He's a reverse Switkowski.I wonder if anyone’s looking at Owies out of Carlton?
He kicks plenty goals. No contract offer yet - they are dicking him around I reckon
Didn’t they basically give us Jye Amiss for nothing?He has that Carlton stank, too.
I know the Blues love poaching our players, but who have we traded in from Carlton previously?
Yeah don’t worry go_the_dockers is all over it.I wonder if anyone’s looking at Owies out of Carlton?
He kicks plenty goals. No contract offer yet - they are dicking him around I reckon
I wonder if anyone’s looking at Owies out of Carlton?
He kicks plenty goals. No contract offer yet - they are dicking him around I reckon
Yeah don’t worry go_the_dockers is all over it.
OmacHe has that Carlton stank, too.
I know the Blues love poaching our players, but who have we traded in from Carlton previously?
Key word tradedOmac
If a fit Martin isn't making B22 then we are top 4 next year, we can find room for himWho does he push out of the best 22?
What role does he play?
How many games is he fit for?
To me, he plays as a fourth tall.
He would be challenging Freddy and Sturt for a spot, and I think he is behind both.
I doubt he is fit for 10 games next year, this year he played 3 afl games, and got injured in 2.
Most importantly, he does not fix our small forward issue.
Not saying he is not good, just not the right player for us.
Thought he was better than Bolten??Does not provide much forward pressure, a bit slow.
I would pass. Think of a less talented, probably slower Michael Walters.
I never said thatThought he was better than Bolten??
Didn’t they basically give us Jye Amiss for nothing?
I keep hearing posters saying we should just draft Berry like It's a given if we want him.If we are still keen on Warner I think we should tell Pickett this is his only chance to request a trade to Freo. If he wants to stay in Melbourne I say we get Bolton with two of our current picks and draft Berry with the remaining pick. That sorts out our forwardline and leaves the future picks for Warner next season. Only downside is our defensive pressure doesn't improve but hopefully that is offset by our increased scoring potential.
Berry won't go top ten, look at the class in the projected top ten. I am almost certain he will drop. Keep pick 9 and that almost guarantees landing him. What teams below us need him?I keep hearing posters saying we should just draft Berry like It's a given if we want him.
Berry is projected to go top 10. What are the chances we can draft him with our pick? Small forwards often go sooner than projected, too. That is a gamble.