Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And we’re out. Traded for the dogs future 4th
He's exciting fonz, great leap and hands tooAgree.
I rate Joe and wanted him to stay.Are you saying you don’t rate Richards on these attributes? Because I do, so it was praise for Hayes.
There’s a recent enough history of players picked later than their talent reasonably dictated due to their short stature (Neale, Jaicos, Gulden) so here’s hoping!
They start the night without any points - who knows what it will be worth once a pick comes in for McGuane?None of the R4 picks next year are worth any points.
But they could be if they’re pushed forward.None of the R4 picks next year are worth any points.
Didn’t he only enter their academy late, when he started to focus on footy? Maybe untapped potential?No, but if the recruiters who'd know best didn't want him, it's not going to fill you with confidence.
None of the R4 picks next year are worth any points.
No list spots left.Seems odd we seem to be done despite Davis and Burmeister still being there
We snookered ourselves with the Markov and Johnson contractsSeems odd we seem to be done despite Davis and Burmeister still being there
We only have two spots left on the list, and we've committed to taking them to the Rookie Draft for Markov and Johnson.Seems odd we seem to be done despite Davis and Burmeister still being there
Riak's a bit shorter than Cochrane I think.Didn’t he only enter their academy late, when he started to focus on footy? Maybe untapped potential?
Or were they after a taller defender, which they selected. Could be a number of reasons. Also, I find that it’s only the 1st (maybe early 2nd round) where academy players are generally matched.
Watching Cochran's video he plays more like a rebounding intercept defender more than a classic key defender, but hey, he's tall.