Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think they'll get more points by splitting their earlier picks further, but maybe something like a future 3rd could come into play. Even from our perspective, I'd rather give them all three picks for one higher up the order than give them one for a future third likely to be essentially a 4th rounder, which is essentially worthless.I think Brisbane would. They still need more points to match Marshall after matching Ashcroft
I doubt anyone is going to trade a future 3rd for a pick in the 50s. At that point they'd probably just back themselves to get whoever at the point in the draft that teams start passing anyway.
I disagree. A future third is a pick in the 50s in a draft not expected to be as deep. Clubs will pay that to move up if there's someone there they want and their next pick is still a fair way away. You might even get a swap of future second for future third.I doubt anyone is going to trade a future 3rd for a pick in the 50s. At that point they'd probably just back themselves to get whoever at the point in the draft that teams start passing anyway.
BTW, the crime novelist, Clancy Dennis is actually a very good KP defender we could get with one of our picksI disagree. A future third is a pick in the 50s in a draft not expected to be as deep. Clubs will pay that to move up if there's someone there they want and their next pick is still a fair way away. You might even get a swap of future second for future third.
Unless we plan on upgrading a rookie, we have to take 3 picks to the draft. And they may if they feel there is enough players on the board around our picks.Not following this thread too closely so forgive if this has been asked.
Assuming we have three vacancies and likely only take two picks to the draft.
One option is obviously trading two picks in the 50s to move up a few spots ( maybe 5-6, exoecting a massive move up 20 spots is nonsense). Any gain up the order is better than burning the pick with a pass.
But would another option be trading one of these picks for a F3 ?
I don't know why but I really like Bailey McKenzie too.Here's manics longshots for now
Clancy Dennis - 195cm KD who takes the game on and has plenty of athleticism, good hands and moves very well.
Bailey McKenzie - 191cm third tall who has plenty of X factor, pack marks and very athletic. Not a KF but the 3rd tall forward is becoming very important if you can find a good one.
6 goals in the GF, he can do it all but will need a couple of years to develop.I don't know why but I really like Bailey McKenzie too.
Just realised Clancy Dennis is 4 days from being in the 2025 draft6 goals in the GF, he can do it all but will need a couple of years to develop.
But aren’t we likely to take a DFA into the senior list? Meaning that drops us down to two live picks and our third pick in the 50s wouldn’t be utilised anyway?Unless we plan on upgrading a rookie, we have to take 3 picks to the draft. And they may if they feel there is enough players on the board around our picks.
Very nice tall defenderJust realised Clancy Dennis is 4 days from being in the 2025 draft
STRENGTHS:
- Athleticism
- Leading patterns
- Speed
- Versatility
- Vertical leap
- Work rate
IMPROVEMENTS:
- Contested work
- Set shot goalkicking
- Size
Has a few things to work on, but has something to work with
Sadly trueHmm, a versatile, undersized forward prospect with questionable set shot goal kicking?
All he needs is a cricket or basketball background and he's a lock to join the black and white.
Our first pick moves into a pick in the mid 40s anyway because all the picks in between will be used for bid matching. So no point trading up.Looking at each teams draft picks if we were going to try and get up the board it would involve packaging our picks and going for either the Lions or Suns 34 or 39 but then we only have one pick in the draft. Lions pick 27 is not possible if you look at the points we have, our collective draft points is 623 and pick 27 is 703.
The other way of maybe getting a pick is with future 3rds, at this point if we could, I would trade a future 2nd but we can't as we traded a future 1st. With list spots so tight around the competition we can hope that a team would trade a their current 3rd for a future 3rd. But then you look at the teams who might be able to do it and you could at max move up 8-10 spots from our best draft pick with pick 43 (Lions) having the first pick in the third round.
These teams have thirds that would be worth trading for
Lions pick 43 - won't trade for a future
Sydney pick 44 - probably most likely to trade for a future
Geelong pick 45 - won't trade
Essendon pick 46 - won't trade
Saints pick 47 - won't trade
Dogs pick 48 - might trade - we would only trade if there was a player we wanted
Best case scenario we get picks 44, 52, 55, 58 - don't know if we would keep 58.
Sadly true
Hopefully we stick to Leppa’s comments and get some key position types who play tall and create a contest. No athletic combine specialists please
Bring on the crime novelist.Here's manics longshots for now
Clancy Dennis - 195cm KD who takes the game on and has plenty of athleticism, good hands and moves very well.
Bailey McKenzie - 191cm third tall who has plenty of X factor, pack marks and very athletic. Not a KF but the 3rd tall forward is becoming very important if you can find a good one.