Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think they'll get more points by splitting their earlier picks further, but maybe something like a future 3rd could come into play. Even from our perspective, I'd rather give them all three picks for one higher up the order than give them one for a future third likely to be essentially a 4th rounder, which is essentially worthless.I think Brisbane would. They still need more points to match Marshall after matching Ashcroft
I doubt anyone is going to trade a future 3rd for a pick in the 50s. At that point they'd probably just back themselves to get whoever at the point in the draft that teams start passing anyway.
I disagree. A future third is a pick in the 50s in a draft not expected to be as deep. Clubs will pay that to move up if there's someone there they want and their next pick is still a fair way away. You might even get a swap of future second for future third.I doubt anyone is going to trade a future 3rd for a pick in the 50s. At that point they'd probably just back themselves to get whoever at the point in the draft that teams start passing anyway.
BTW, the crime novelist, Clancy Dennis is actually a very good KP defender we could get with one of our picksI disagree. A future third is a pick in the 50s in a draft not expected to be as deep. Clubs will pay that to move up if there's someone there they want and their next pick is still a fair way away. You might even get a swap of future second for future third.
Unless we plan on upgrading a rookie, we have to take 3 picks to the draft. And they may if they feel there is enough players on the board around our picks.Not following this thread too closely so forgive if this has been asked.
Assuming we have three vacancies and likely only take two picks to the draft.
One option is obviously trading two picks in the 50s to move up a few spots ( maybe 5-6, exoecting a massive move up 20 spots is nonsense). Any gain up the order is better than burning the pick with a pass.
But would another option be trading one of these picks for a F3 ?
I don't know why but I really like Bailey McKenzie too.Here's manics longshots for now
Clancy Dennis - 195cm KD who takes the game on and has plenty of athleticism, good hands and moves very well.
Bailey McKenzie - 191cm third tall who has plenty of X factor, pack marks and very athletic. Not a KF but the 3rd tall forward is becoming very important if you can find a good one.
6 goals in the GF, he can do it all but will need a couple of years to develop.I don't know why but I really like Bailey McKenzie too.
Just realised Clancy Dennis is 4 days from being in the 2025 draft6 goals in the GF, he can do it all but will need a couple of years to develop.
But aren’t we likely to take a DFA into the senior list? Meaning that drops us down to two live picks and our third pick in the 50s wouldn’t be utilised anyway?Unless we plan on upgrading a rookie, we have to take 3 picks to the draft. And they may if they feel there is enough players on the board around our picks.
Very nice tall defenderJust realised Clancy Dennis is 4 days from being in the 2025 draft