Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Gives new meaning to Urquhart's Bluff here on the west coastI think you're asking for a lot here. Sam Lalor is 188cm and in the young Jordy mold - will probably go pick 1.
Luke Urquart is the powerful mid who is considered liekly to go in our range, but he looks like a butcher.
is there a mid who is in the 188cm range who would be available at our picks?
Sounds like a character from Breaking BadSulzberger maybe but not nearly as explosive as a JDG
Good thing we didn't get stringer, those 2 would not have gotten onHe's more explosive than unplugged suggests. He's fire bombed 2 rival meth labs already this month.
I'm thinking Sulzberger and Clancy Dennis would be a good pairing. The crime writer would have some good material to write about.Good thing we didn't get stringer, those 2 would not have gotten on
goes without saying anyone available at our pick will have flaws that need to be ironed out.I think you're asking for a lot here. Sam Lalor is 188cm and in the young Jordy mold - will probably go pick 1.
Luke Urquart is the powerful mid who is considered liekly to go in our range, but he looks like a butcher.
West or Nicholls, like Dennis and Kennedy. Also like the idea of us having Cox, Jack Ough and Condon - I can hear the call now: Cox to Jack Ough who spills it and Condon does the cleaning up.
goes without saying anyone available at our pick will have flaws that need to be ironed out.
I suggest you revisit the 2006 draft.There wouldn't be a universe where hine takes 3 talls.
That's 18 years ago.I suggest you revisit the 2006 draft.
8- ben reid , 10- nathan brown, 28- chris dawesThere wouldn't be a universe where hine takes 3 talls.
True, but I bet he won't this year. He'll take one tall I reckon. Can't see any recruiter taking 3 talls that late in the draft8- ben reid , 10- nathan brown, 28- chris dawes
The balls on hine to go all talls that early in the draft. So he is willing to pull the trigger if it is necessary.
Yeah, there will be a different player type who they rate highly who gets through to us.True, but I bet he won't this year. He'll take one tall I reckon. Can't see any recruiter taking 3 talls that late in the draft
KennedyYeah, there will be a different player type who they rate highly who gets through to us.
Considering our objective of picking up aj and markov in the rookie draft, our only realy option of shoring up our kpd stocks willl be via the draft this year.True, but I bet he won't this year. He'll take one tall I reckon. Can't see any recruiter taking 3 talls that late in the draft
The next Scott West. Looks a ripper.Jagga the next Paddy Wow
Jagga is far from Dow. Best player in the draftThe next Scott West. Looks a ripper.
But it was definitely in this universe! Don’t go changing the rules on me!That's 18 years ago.
How does that work? I count 4 …
Out:
Murphy (IIRC we’d already ‘replaced’ his spot at MSD by a rookie?)
Carmichael (r)
Noble
Richards
Begg (r)
Bytel (r)
Krueger
Eyre (r)
In:
Houston
Perryman
Membrey
Transfer:
Johnson -> r
Markov -> r
So that all means we’ve freed up 6 main list spots (Murphy, Noble, Richards, Krueger, Johnson and Markov), we’ve filled 3 already (Houston, Perryman, Membrey), leaving 3. But we can extend our main list from 36 to 37 to give us 4 we can fill in the draft, as long as we reduce our rookie count by 1 (ie from 8 to 7)
So on the rookie side we’ve gone from 4 out (Carmichael, Begg, Bytel and Eyre), we got one in at the MSD to replace Murphy’s spot (effectively Ned Long), leaving us 3. We spend two of those on Markov and Johnson, leaving us with one remaining - which remains vacant to allow us to draft 4 at the national draft and expand our senior list to 37.
Have I missed anything?