Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Hopefully Davis will be be one of those bolting sliders that turn up occasionally in the draftIn that scenario, does Davis slide or do you think we'll trade-up to get him?
This is a pretty weird statement.
How dare you Jen!
I'd love to know all these rules about the ages of people I'm allowed to know. FMD
You would think by now collingwood will have an idea if aj or markov have been shown some interest from teams.
They also have a couple of players they've said they'll re-rookie (Burgess & Schoenberg). So maybe that's not so likely?I have a feeling AJ may be snapped up by Adelaide in the rookie draft....
What a strange turn.
There seems to be some confusion between talking to someone and touching their genitals.
Yep but that draft and how it fell was a bit different.
North believed JHF to be worthy of pick one and wanted the prestige for him as pick 1.
Western Bulldogs were never not matching the FS bid by GWS on KPP Darcy.
GWS maybe the ones who helped us the most as they bid on SD and then picked which was the pick we gave them.
Nick in pies circles and some other clubs believed (correctly) Nick was number 1.
Was a bit of perfect storm for us.
Imo Ashcroft circumstances are different but result will be the same.
If it were me I'd just say up front to whoever I'm drafting "we're going to take the pressure off you, and make this other kid deal with all the media focus", but it wouldn't surprise me if the AFL also doesn't want Ashcroft going too high because they don't want it to look like a farce, with the premiers also getting the #1 pick.This whole dick swinging exercise about being able to attach the No.1 mantle to the player you select should be secondary to making your competition pay up in full IMO.
What a strange turn.
There seems to be some confusion between talking to someone and touching their genitals.
Or maybe it's just self-evidently wrong-headed.It's fine to disagree with Scodog but there's no need to dismiss a comment that's quite clearly come from a genuine place of concern the way you did. If you think it's a load of bullshit, explain why.
Not necessarily true. Greenwood to Norf comes to mind, completely blindsided GC. We also took Henry Schade from GC before their pick.Generally once you commit to re-rooking players, I think rivals tend to steer clear, unless they are really determined to pry a player out. I suspect they'll be back on our list by friday.
Yeah, there are cases where it happens. Thats why I said generally - Of course there are some cases it can happen depending on the player and situation. David Noble had a connection to Greenwood I think and they felt they could use his experience. So if it makes sense depending on the club, its been known to happen from time to time.Not necessarily true. Greenwood to Norf comes to mind, completely blindsided GC. We also took Henry Schade from GC before their pick.
It's pretty extreme to discourage intergenerational contact due to the potential for grooming.That's a pretty extreme spectrum which diminishes how much inappropriateness can occur in between.
Not all intergenerational contact. Family and teachers are ok. That never ends badly.It's pretty extreme to discourage intergenerational contact due to the potential for grooming.
Or to create blatantly false equivalency between the behaviour of typical adult male & female populations.It's pretty extreme to discourage intergenerational contact due to the potential for grooming.
It's pretty extreme to discourage intergenerational contact due to the potential for grooming.