List Mgmt. 2024 National Draft - November 20-21

[Jen2310]

 

[watt price tully]

I’m stumpin’ for Stumph. Wouldn’t mind him.

 

[greening22]

Alright, end of Round 1

Still available (noting there has already been 2 players taken I didn't even have listed)

19. Jobe Shanahan
21. Jack Whitlock
25. Alex Dodson
28. Kayle Gerreyn
29. Christian Moraes
30. Jack Ough
31. Hamish Davis
32. Tom Gross
33. Ben Camporeale
34. Harry O'Farrell
36. Noah Mraz
37. James Barrat
38. Thomas Sims
39. Angus Clarke
40. Jasper Alger
41. Lachie Jaques
42. Malakai Champion
43. Hugh Boxshall
44. Archer Day-Wicks
45. Adrian Cole
46. Logan Smith
47. Luke Urquhart
48. Charlie Nicholls
49. Josh Dolan
50. Xavier Ivisic
51. Josh Murphy
52. Evan Bradley
53. Tyler Welsh
54. Lennox Hofmann
55. Floyd Burmeister
56. Nathaniel Sulzberger
57. Bailey McKenzie
58. Lucas Camporeale
59. Joel Cochran
60. Clancy Dennis
61. Riley Bice
62. Cody Anderson
63. Sam Davidson
64. Rhys Unwin
65. Benny Barrett
66. Sam Toner
67. Will Hayes
68. Jayden Nguyen
69. Gabriel Stumpf

Very good work. Hopefully some will still be available when we use out 1st pick whether that be 45 - currently - or perhaps 44 or 43 or 42 or possibly 41.

 

[sr36]

Generally you don't make a trade up just to take the best player available, it is usually done to take a specific player. If North got pick 8, they very well may have taken matt whitlock with that pick.

They supposedly had Tauru in the mix at 2 - who was still there at 8. But after he went who knows and who knows when it went from their F1 outright to F1 with Rchmond F2 coming back. It's a guess.

 

[greening22]

Wouldn't be shocked if North's first next year isn't in the top 5

Who cares about North. They are a total basket case. I still have not forgotten what happened in 1977.

 

[ElliottsMaggies]

 

[magpies42]

Try and package 45 and 48 for something further up.

Then take 2 later.

That’s a great idea, but why would anyone take that.

 

[greening22]

That's not how that works.

There won't be any more cases of multiple picks being used to match a bid at this point, more than likely, so every bid that gets made will exhaust one pick but add one player to the order, so we won't move up any further.

If any players get matched with picks after ours, which is likely, we'll move down the order a few spots.

I read on another forum the following:

The discount for bid matching has also been reduced, with a 10% discount in the first round, and an 84-point discount thereafter. As such, bids after pick 50 do not require points and may be matched with the next pick.

"Just a correction, bids from #37 on can be matched with the next pick and don't require points."

So does that mean bids after pick 50 do not require points & so may be simply matched with the next pick? Or is the critical threshold number 37? I am curious to find out. If anyone can provide an authoritative answer it would be much appreciated.

 

[loki04]

I get King brother vibes.

But less athletic and talented and move more ruckmen like.

 

[Basil brush]

Who cares about North. They are a total basket case. I still have not forgotten what happened in 1977.

I was born in nsw in 1976, so a bit young, lol, but what happened in 1977?

Draw?

I love our history so much.

 

[Basil brush]

I personally think Sid draper will be best player out of this draft. Obviously Adelaide got him.

 

[Basil brush]

I get Richmond don't bid on ashcroft at 1, but seriously the next 3 teams not bidding?

 

[jc37]

So North trade a top 5 draft pick for 27 and 30…

Not sure how Richmond manage to keep getting first round picks for absolutely nothing…

I think they are giving away a pick in the 18-20 mark for Whitlock and a pick in the 6-10 range. Matching next year which push picks in rather than out as previous years with new system.
I dont think it will be as bad as it looks. If North finish last it will be a disaster though surely they cant be as bad as they have been last few years. They are loaded with talent.
I think Richmond will be happy with the deal regardless.

 

[FIGJAM]

That’s a great idea, but why would anyone take that.

St Kilda and Carlton have bids and we can dabble in future swaps and the like.

 

[Apex36]

Couldn't give a rats about the draft when our first pick is in the 40's.
Arlo Draper? Cooper Murley?

Yes, let’s cherry pick the post 40 failures and ignore the successes. Good idea.

 

[Rusty Beam]

Surely Brisbane do us a solid now and trade 46 or 47 for our 53 & 61.

Picks 45, 47 and 48 would allow us to really pick the players we want without having to hedge against other clubs picks.

 

[Soups]

Couldn't give a rats about the draft when our first pick is in the 40's.
Arlo Draper? Cooper Murley?

What a sour look.

 

[manicpie]

I personally think Sid draper will be best player out of this draft. Obviously Adelaide got him.

I can't get his brother out of my head. I reckon he'll be a flop

 

[whiskeytown]

Couldn't give a rats about the draft when our first pick is in the 40's.
Arlo Draper? Cooper Murley?

Bianco… Rantall… Ruscoe, Draper etc, etc

Yes it’s unlikely… but Mcreery was pick 44

Joe Richards pick 48

Harrison pick 52

Further back Tom Langdon pick 65

If one of these kids ends up playing 50-100 games then it will be a big win for the club

But yeah… highly likely whoever they take tonight will be delisted in two years time

 

[SchuPie]

It's Davis by the way. Screams Dekka.

Yeah but if they want him, I reckon they need to move in front of WCE at 44

Be great to bring in Davis and Dennis but not sure how

 

[Vinnie Vegas]

I read on another forum the following:

"Just a correction, bids from #37 on can be matched with the next pick and don't require points."

So does that mean bids after pick 50 do not require points & so may be simply matched with the next pick? Or is the critical threshold number 37? I am curious to find out. If anyone can provide an authoritative answer it would be much appreciated.

It's just that the points to match are so low that it basically doesn't present an issue after a certain point.

 

[sr36]

If any players get matched with picks after ours, which is likely, we'll move down the order a few spots.

The number gets higher but the pick doesn't lose value as it's value is pinned to available players and that doesn't change regardless of where the Camporeales and Cochrane get bids.

Last night, we really moved up to pick 41 in terms of available players.

 

[unplugged]

It's Davis by the way. Screams Dekka.

I'd be very surprised if Hamish Davis is still around by our pick, especially with West Coast on the board at 30 & 44 and Freo up at 34.

Previous years we've seen both teams take local talent whenever available, even at a reach.

 

[sr36]

I'd be very surprised if Hamish Davis is still around by our pick, especially with West Coast on the board at 30 & 44 and Freo up at 34.

Previous years we've seen both teams take local talent whenever available, even at a reach.

I want Davis, so just shut your mouth.

 

[celestial]

Surely Brisbane do us a solid now and trade 46 or 47 for our 53 & 61.

Picks 45, 47 and 48 would allow us to really pick the players we want without having to hedge against other clubs picks.

i agree, the only issue is 53 and 61 used to be 60 and 66, which we got from brisbane in the trade. Not sure we could swing that.

 

[celestial]

Stupid tweet, they weren’t ever taking Whitlock with pick 8. More likely they were taking the best tall available with whatever pick they received, and Whitlock was it when they finally got a trade.

Pretty sure I would trust their word over yours when it comes to who north wanted. They may well have had their sights set solely on whitlock and were prepared to take him as high as 8.