- Aug 6, 2021
- 10,723
- 31,026
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Throw in Rosas and Davies and it'd be the deal of the off-seasonNo offence buttox but if we traded 2 for 6 and 13 we should be investigated by ASIC.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Throw in Rosas and Davies and it'd be the deal of the off-seasonNo offence buttox but if we traded 2 for 6 and 13 we should be investigated by ASIC.
I really don't think there is much difference between the players we would get at 2 vs 6.No offence buttox but if we traded 2 for 6 and 13 we should be investigated by ASIC.
Touche.No offence King Corey but I suspect you're imagining standout high end midfield talent is available to us
All good mate I don't mind you disagreeing.Touche.
I think 2 for 6 and 13 would be a poor return. Hopefully the club share this view.
Bring 13 back to a top 10 selection and it changes things a little bit.
Statistically the top 3 are standouts in the long run. There's no reason this draft will break from the pattern when we all look back.
From a sheer probability perspective, maybe.I think 2 for 6 and 13 would be a poor return. Hopefully the club share this view.
Bring 13 back to a top 10 selection and it changes things a little bit.
A few have mentioned Hotton a while back, but of course did his ACL. If and its a big IF we turned #2 into picks 6 and 9, I'd quite like the thought of taking Armstrong and Trainor, and hoping Hotton (perhaps unlikely) slides to our second rounder the way Brayden George did. Seems unlikely but not out of the question.Who do you think in this draft crop has a decent shot at showing the promise of Sheezel, Wardlaw, McKercher and TT?
Cause based on this year's highlights, I can't see them.
Are you guys sure you aren't imagining a standout elite midfielder that - on the basis of this year's form - doesn't exist this draft?
Trainor is a trap imo.A few have mentioned Hotton a while back, but of course did his ACL. If and its a big IF we turned #2 into picks 6 and 9, I'd quite like the thought of taking Armstrong and Trainor, and hoping Hotton (perhaps unlikely) slides to our second rounder the way Brayden George did. Seems unlikely but not out of the question.
They can throw in RosasTouche.
I think 2 for 6 and 13 would be a poor return. Hopefully the club share this view.
Bring 13 back to a top 10 selection and it changes things a little bit.
Statistically the top 3 are standouts in the long run. There's no reason this draft will break from the pattern when we all look back.
It's not as bad as all that. Our big mistakes are behind us. A bit of experience coming in and actually draft some kpfs and small forwards will balance our list a heap.I actually don’t care what we do with our pick 2. It’s not a rant but more or less just the truth m.
We’ve had pick 3 who leaves us with more questions than answers. Pick one, a generational talent and lost him a year later.
Bounced back with the princes who were promised with Wardlaw and Sheezel. Pick 2 and 3 in sonic and a mercurial half forward.
We’ve been really only able to unleash one and half of those and see their ability from year one, in Sheezel and Kercher.
But we have still ****ing sucked so badly and it leaves massive question marks if we even have the ability to develop high draft picks who are clearly talented enough.
So I don’t mind, split it and get trainor who probably is too small for our KPD needs, pick the best mid in Draper who would suit us the most - do whatever
There is no Sheezel, that's the problem.I’d only be considering trading 2 if we could say with a level of certainty that we land Trainor & Armstrong. Would require 6 & 10ish, which is a premium yet I’m still not convinced it’s the right call.
Pick 2 is an elite tier with Smith, FOS & Draper. Trading out of that elite tier requires something elite in return. I wouldn’t want to end up in a situation where we trade away the rights to a Sheezel for a Ginbey and a Hewett, as much as some on here think it’s a brilliant idea.
The kid is a beast. Super agile for his size, huge leap and a thumping kick.I just realised Gerreyn already weighs more than any of our current players aside from our rucks and Logue.
Kayle Gerreyn | WAFL
wafl.com.au
I knew he was a beefcake, but wow.
I almost consider him like a mature ager Kpf just due to his size. He could totally play round 1.I just realised Gerreyn already weighs more than any of our current players aside from our rucks and Logue.
Kayle Gerreyn | WAFL
wafl.com.au
I knew he was a beefcake, but wow.
No offence buttox but if we traded 2 for 6 and 13 we should be investigated by ASIC.
Saves us probably 1.2m on Darling for 2 years given he's on 800k next year. No need to worry about Membrey or other stop gap. Put that 1.2m towards Mac Andrew.I almost consider him like a mature ager Kpf just due to his size. He could totally play round 1.
Big upgrade on pink.
Yes.So what do you propose we do? just take another mid?
You know, you gotta love a bit of GMan, you just gotta!For me GMan is a must
I just don't understand how its biologically possible for a fit 18 year old to weigh 100 kgs.You know, you gotta love a bit of GMan, you just gotta!
It’s buyer beware with ex-Richmond premiership stars, they’ve just finished dead last.Richmond finished dead last. These players that want out are not worth as much as people make them out to be.
Tree trunks for legsI just don't understand how its biologically possible for a fit 18 year old to weigh 100 kgs.
Good question Merlin007, you crafty wizard, let me give you an answer, Colby Mckercher + George Wardlaw, that's plan B.Good effort, but let me pitch the scenario to you from the last 2 games of the season - Sheezel misses, and the opposition sit on LDU; what's Plan B?