Game Day 2024 Non-Swans Game Day

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
They got a massive rub of the green late. Was shocking bias

non-50m call on 2 Pie's players, non-HTB call on Daicos, the free he also got which led to a Hill goal was incredibly soft, and Krueger could've goaled from another incredibly soft one...

It's like every 50/50 goes their way.

Daicos has his own set of rules i dont think its possible to get a HTB decision on him
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The only reason why I think it wasn’t a 50, was the mark even paid because it wasn’t 15 metres? It looked like it wasn’t when the Kangaroos player played on.


But I haven’t seen the goal review blunder yet though.
 
The only reason why I think it wasn’t a 50, was the mark even paid because it wasn’t 15 metres? It looked like it wasn’t when the Kangaroos player played on.


But I haven’t seen the goal review blunder yet though.

Will be interesting what they decide to make up to tick it off
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Will be interesting what they decide to make up to tick it off
Was a strange passage of play. If the Kangaroos player just held his spot instead of playing on, it would have been 50m. No composure
 
Ha look how they overturned that Toby goal

The only reason why I think it wasn’t a 50, was the mark even paid because it wasn’t 15 metres? It looked like it wasn’t when the Kangaroos player played on.


But I haven’t seen the goal review blunder yet though.
Umpire blew whistle for the mark.
 
Either it should have been 50m or the Kangaroos player shouldn’t have played on. Errors from the umpire and player I think
It doesn't matter if it looked like he was about to play on. The umpire hadn't called play on when the Collingwood players ran straight over the mark. And there was two of them!

That 50m penalty has been paid every time for 10 years.
 
It's a real shame what a massive flog Zak Butters has become
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top