Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was also thinking along the lines of running Jacko @ R1, then bringing Gawn in after his first bye.Stupid sexy Flanders.
This is probably the 30 until Thursday and then Friday and then Saturday.... I have $7K left which I am not sure I am keen on.
View attachment 1925662
View attachment 1925663
Nice team, should go OKView attachment 1925683
Thoughts on the team?
For what it's worth (also VeinGlorious ), Ryan Daniels sticking by the original timeframe on Sean Darcy's return (4, vs 6-8 Tom Morris):
Like the Ash and Rowell picks.Stupid sexy Flanders.
This is probably the 30 until Thursday and then Friday and then Saturday.... I have $7K left which I am not sure I am keen on.
View attachment 1925662
View attachment 1925663
Good side, no need to change.This will get me through to Thursday I think. I might be the only one staying clear of Jackson - just need to back myself in.
I'd love to get Naismith in, but with only $5k left, it's not currently possible without making further changes.
Not completely sold on the Fish right now, but due to lack of better options...
View attachment 1925766
Don't bring in Macrae. Doubtful to play round 1. Very different looking team to a lot being posted. Not necessarily a bad thing. Need to fix up your bench once teams are named though. I see 4 bench players there who probably won't get picked round 1. Don't need a loophole at this stage of the season.Reckon I have had 1,000 attempts at this..
I had Himmelberg but swapped to Williams, may be tempted to swap back.
Heeney could also turn in McRae, I think I have the cash to do that.
Phillipou is probably doozy though.
I look forward to being told on tiktok that I'll be in the bottom 1% of players.
View attachment 1925774
The Bench piece is somewhat deliberate trying to maximize one field players, but could easily backfire.Don't bring in Macrae. Doubtful to play round 1. Very different looking team to a lot being posted. Not necessarily a bad thing. Need to fix up your bench once teams are named though. I see 4 bench players there who probably won't get picked round 1. Don't need a loophole at this stage of the season.
Barring any last minute selection nonsense, happy to run with this as my starting side. Well balanced bye wise (no more than two missing per round) and can cover the outs easily and get a full 22 each week. as the rookies are plentiful with good JS.
Ash, Clark and Telly my super PODs,
My one renaming question is my FWD line (it's a disaster for everyone), could be TOO thin ... may be that I need to get a big dog at F1 (Flanders, Jacko etc), can drop Telly down to do so.
Otherwise I'm pretty happy with the rest of the side... Have four reliable C/VC options available (Naicos, Butters, Bont, Dawson)
View attachment 1925771
You will fall behind very quickly if you don't have bench players generating cash. Straight away you could replace Caddy and Reville with Wilson and Clark without changing anything on field. Must have playing rookies if you are going to succeed.The Bench piece is somewhat deliberate trying to maximize one field players, but could easily backfire.
Cash gen is everything early in the season.The Bench piece is somewhat deliberate trying to maximize one field players, but could easily backfire.
Thanks!Love a team that's not afraid to start a few PODs. Hope the Kelly, Clark and Ash picks work out for you.
Gryan - do it - I need all the help I can get.Okay someone talk me off the ledge, what needs fixing here. I just have this feeling about Gryan. Had the same feeling about Noah Anderson last year and that worked out.
View attachment 1925089
You're better off having Livingstone as the non playing ruck.This will get me through to Thursday I think. I might be the only one staying clear of Jackson - just need to back myself in.
I'd love to get Naismith in, but with only $5k left, it's not currently possible without making further changes.
Not completely sold on the Fish right now, but due to lack of better options...
View attachment 1925766
Definitely and less time consuming for players.I wish we could go back to the days of 20 trades.
The game would become far more strategic.
Especially this year with so many rookie options, those with a good starting team would be rewarded.I wish we could go back to the days of 20 trades.
The game would become far more strategic.
Disagree on the lock out. Suits the casuals more that way.Definitely and less time consuming for players.
It was nice to lock in everything prior to the first game on Friday night.
If you get a late out, bad luck - that’s what the Emergencies are there for and it’s fair on everyone