List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part 3

[giantroo]

Spoiler: 2024 Draft Picks

 

[The Nostradamus]

Imagine the day we finally walk someone to the PSD.

Beers all over this board!

Unfortunately clubs no longer do this

But yes imagine walking a gun out of contract player to the psd (eg bailey smith)

 

[Shinboner1]

Is Jack Martin the only player ‘walked’ to the PSD in the last decade?

Who was that Adelaide kid from gws they delsited after 3 years?

 

[perplexed]

Who was that Adelaide kid from gws they delsited after 3 years?

Jackson Hately

 

[TennisPlayerAndy]

Jackson Hately

Huge wraps as an under ager.

Did nothing.

 

[Rooboys Rool]

Is Jack Martin the only player ‘walked’ to the PSD in the last decade?

Who was that Adelaide kid from gws they delsited after 3 years?

Jackson Hately

 

[FootySmartSimpson]

It isn't a surprise that Port are being bastards about their return for Houston. Any other club (including us) would do the same for a two time All Australian who's under contract.

Haha! This is the funniest post of the day. Thank you!

 

[Rod Stroker]

Errrr no. They don't currently have 13 and 23

It's out: F1, Richards and Noble
In: Houston.

Isn't the GC 13 in the mix for the Pies with the Noble trade?

 

[DarkPhoenix]

Brissie mate pointed out the following trade they made for Hodge, which I don't think is insanely different from the Parker scenario.
Yes, Parker has a year to run on a contract, but they've also made it pretty clear that he's not in their future plans, trade off for him being in contract, is we're taking his wage off their books.

Giving up a pick in the 40s would be pretty rich.

 

[hilly]

Hello North Melbourne fans. Enjoyed our rivalry in the 90s. Would you consider 9 and a future first for your current pick 2?

No deal Adrian.

 

[perplexed]

Isn't the GC 13 in the mix for the Pies with the Noble trade?

It is but they aren't providing it, GC are. Collingwood are trying to get Houston for just Noble, Richards and their F1.

 

[Harris 10]

Brissie mate pointed out the following trade they made for Hodge, which I don't think is insanely different from the Parker scenario.
Yes, Parker has a year to run on a contract, but they've also made it pretty clear that he's not in their future plans, trade off for him being in contract, is we're taking his wage off their books.

Giving up a pick in the 40s would be pretty rich.

View attachment 2137542

Hadn’t Hodge retired before going to Bris?

 

[DarkPhoenix]

Hadn’t Hodge retired before going to Bris?

Reneged on the retirement.
Clarko had wanted him to stay for another year+
So they traded.

 

[ohmygewd]

Brissie mate pointed out the following trade they made for Hodge, which I don't think is insanely different from the Parker scenario.
Yes, Parker has a year to run on a contract, but they've also made it pretty clear that he's not in their future plans, trade off for him being in contract, is we're taking his wage off their books.

Giving up a pick in the 40s would be pretty rich.

View attachment 2137542

According to draftguru's calculator...we have the exact pick for the Parker trade:

 

[Mr north man]

Unfortunately clubs no longer do this

But yes imagine walking a gun out of contract player to the psd (eg bailey smith)

Time to get tough and grow a set F:ck the AFL and the other 17 clubs.
This a Fu:king business not a sport anymore if we continue the be WOKE NICE then we won’t be going anywhere.
This club needs to become a bunch of Allen Funts to get respect back as we atm the joke of the sport in all aspects.
If there’s a player we want and can’t get a deal done then walk them to the PSD and if anyone complains tell them To go and get F:cked mind your own business and worry about your own clubs.

 

[hotchilli]

Time to get tough and grow a set F:ck the AFL and the other 17 clubs.
This a Fu:king business not a sport anymore if we continue the be WOKE NICE then we won’t be going anywhere.
This club needs to become a bunch of Allen Funts to get respect back as we atm the joke of the sport in all aspects.
If there’s a player we want and can’t get a deal done then walk them to the PSD and if anyone complains tell them To go and get F:cked mind your own business and worry about your own clubs.

Damn our woke trading strategies

 

[The Talent Scout]

If we get Houston or not, Daniel still needs to be realistic. If they want this years second rounder, we just develop what we have in those areas. If we can't split 2, that second rounder will be our KPP prospect from this draft.

Maybe, maybe not. If we are prepared to go down three or four spots on the draft ladder then I doubt very much we are going to take another midfielder because if we did like one of the gun mids, then we wouldn't be doing this because there is a chance he would be gone. Another question arises in the form of "what if our draft whiteboard has someone else at the top and it isn't a midfielder?

I guess the one component here is splitting/keeping/trading in future first to actually see what picks we are going into the draft with but either way no matter what happens, if things don't pan out, we are not then going to draft a gun mid because the player we like we can't get at a later pick, we won't be playing "devil's advocate" in this instance, on the worst case scenario and we just have pick 2, in that top section we will pick our player, make no bones about that.

I think whether its a future first or splitting our pick 2, one of these will happen but if not we won't be looking elsewhere. We just can't be choosing top mids all the time, and now we can choose a gun key forward in this draft say "nah, we will pick one up in the second round where possibly the top two or three key forwards are gone, if we are going to prioritise talent then why should it just be confined to midfielders?

Don't get me wrong I love Finn, Sam, Sid, Jagga, Langford, and Smillie offer us a different kind of midfielder, if one of these boys became a "Roo", I guarantee you I would love that player as I do, like the rest of our boys!

 

[The Talent Scout]

Our inner scrotes seem quiet.

View attachment 2134981

They know!

 

[The Dougster]

The deal is done. Houston has had three weeks to say he's open to playing for North, and shut down any of the Collingwood/Carlton talk. He's using us so piss him off. Our offer couldn't be better. If he was just happy to play in Victoria, he'd have signed with us by now.

Yep.

He's got the choice of two big melbourne clubs, stay at a top four club or us. Unfortunately, our chances were never good.

 

[desie]

Time to get tough and grow a set F:ck the AFL and the other 17 clubs.
This a Fu:king business not a sport anymore if we continue the be WOKE NICE then we won’t be going anywhere.
This club needs to become a bunch of Allen Funts to get respect back as we atm the joke of the sport in all aspects.
If there’s a player we want and can’t get a deal done then walk them to the PSD and if anyone complains tell them To go and get F:cked mind your own business and worry about your own clubs.

Allen Funt!

I haven’t heard that name in years.

 

[Dodecahedron]

Allen Funt!

I haven’t heard that name in years.

Allen Funt = the Cucking

 

[The Talent Scout]

F1st to GC for Pick#13 and Pick#40 or #51
Pick#40 or #51 to Swannies for Parker
Pick #13 and F2nd to Port for Houston

Finish with 2, 25, 44, 61 Houston and Parker and then split pick#2 to the Tiggers, Melbourne, Freo if a deal is appropriate..

Bad bad bad puddytat.
Puddytat drawing up the plans for that scenario....

 

[The Talent Scout]

No worries! Port are asking too much.

Absolute greedy grubs.

We all know what they are.

 

[Devington]

Houston has said he wants to go to Melbourne. Carlton were the front runners and all the news was they were his desired destination. Now Collingwood are the front runners and are (funnily enough) still his favoured destination. In both these cases the stumbling block was... no deal with PORT being agreed to. The gossip here is that... PORT are being unreasonable with us with their trade demands.

The issue isn't which club Houston wants to get to. It's that Port are being campaigners. Maybe I've just being primed by the super early gossip posted here about Houston ONLY wanting to get to come to Victoria, but everything seems to genuinely point that way. I've taken zero offence that he hasn't nominated us. He also hasn't nominated Melbourne, or Carlton, or Collingwood for heavens sake. Should they also back out?

 

[The Talent Scout]

They aren't happy about it over on the Port board. They want to only deal with us

Judas likes this!

 

[hotchilli]

Houston has said he wants to go to Melbourne. Carlton were the front runners and all the news was they were his desired destination. Now Collingwood are the front runners and are (funnily enough) still his favoured destination. In both these cases the stumbling block was... no deal with PORT being agreed to. The gossip here is that... PORT are being unreasonable with us with their trade demands.

The issue isn't which club Houston wants to get to. It's that Port are being campaigners. Maybe I've just being primed by the super early gossip posted here about Houston ONLY wanting to get to come to Victoria, but everything seems to genuinely point that way. I've taken zero offence that he hasn't nominated us. He also hasn't nominated Melbourne, or Carlton, or Collingwood for heavens sake. Should they also back out?

Have we possibly come to the trade table with too much of a focus on using the correct pronouns?