List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad



PlayerOriginal ClubTrade/FANew ClubResult
Harry SharpBrisbane & MelbourneTradeMelbourneMelbourne receives Brisbane's Harry Sharp, 2025 R3 pick (tied to Brisbane)
Brisbane receives Melbourne's 2024 R3(49), 2025 R3 pick (tied to Essendon).
Dan Houston
Jack Lukosius
Joe Richards
Rory Atkins
John Noble
Port Adelaide
Gold Coast
Collingwood
Gold Coast
Collingwood
TradeCollingwood
Port Adelaide
Port Adelaide
Port Adelaide
Gold Coast
Port Adelaide receives GC's R1(13),GC R2(29,36), GC R3(50) Picks, Jack Lukosius, Joe Richards, Rory Atkins
Gold Coast receives Collingwood's 2025 F1, PA's 2025 F1, PA R2(39)
Collingwood receive Dan Houston, PA R4(58)
Matt Owies
Liam Baker
Carlton & RichmondTradeWest CoastRound 1 pick (3), Round 4 (63,68) to Carlton
Round 1 Pick (14) to Richmond
Round 1 Pick(12), R4 (73) to WCE
Liam Baker to WCE
Matt Owies to WCE
Isaac CummingGWSUFAAdelaideEnd of Round 1 Compo (pick 21) to GWS
Josh BattleSt KildaUFAHawthornRound 1 Compo (Pick 8) to St.Kilda
Tom CampbellSt KildaDFAMelbourneNo Compensation
Harry PerrymanGWSUFACollingwoodRound 1 Compo (Pick 16) to GWS
Elliott HimmelbergAdelaideUFAGold CoastNo Compensation
Nick HaynesGWSUFACarltonNo Compensation
Alex Neal-BullenMelbourneTradeAdelaideRound 2 Pick (28) to Melbourne
Jack DarlingWest CoastTradeNorth MelbourneRound 4 pick (68) to WCE
Jack GrahamRichmondUFAWest CoastEnd of Round 2 Compo (Pick 42) to Richmond

Brisbane Lions trade Harry Sharp and its 2025 Round 3 pick (tied to Brisbane) to Melbourne for its 2024 Round 3 pick (currently 49) and its 2025 Round 3 pick (tied to Essendon).
-----------------
Collingwood get Houston and Pick 58 and give up: a future first round pick, Joe Richards to Port and John Noble to Gold Coast

Port get Jack Lukosius, Richards, Rory Atkins, picks 13, 29, 36 and 50 in this year’s draft while letting Houston go to Collingwood, their future first round pick, pick 39 in this year’s goes to Gold Coast and pick 58 goes to Collingwood.

Gold Coast get Noble, a future first round pick from each of Collingwood and Port Adelaide, and pick 39 (received from Port), while the Suns send Lukosius and Atkins, picks 13, 29 and 50 to Port Adelaide.
-------------
St Kilda trade its Round Two selection (currently 27) to the Brisbane Lions for its Round Two selection (currently 32) and its Round Three selection (currently 45) in the 2024 Telstra AFL Draft.
----------
Three club trade approved.Richmond trade Liam Baker to the West Coast Eagles.West Coast Eagles trade its Round One selection (currently 3) and both its Round Four selections (currently 63 and 68) in the 2024 Telstra AFL Draft to Carlton.
Carlton trade Matthew Owies, its Round One selection (currently 12) and its Round Four selection (currently 73) to West Coast Eagles. Carlton trade its Round One selection (currently 14 ) to Richmond.
----------
Melbourne trade its two 2024 Round 2 selections (currently 28 and 40), two 2024 Round 3 selections (currently 46 and 54), its 2024 Round 4 selection (currently 65) and its 2025 Round 1 selection to Essendon.
Essendon trade its 2024 Round 1 selection (currently 9) and its 2025 Round 3 selection in the 2024 and 2025 Telstra AFL Drafts respectively to Melbourne.
---------
Melbourne trade its 2025 Round 3 selection to the Adelaide Crows for its 2024 Round 3 selection (currently 46) in the 2024 and 2025 Telstra AFL Drafts respectively.
---------
Brisbane trade its 2024 Round 1 selection (currently 20) to Richmond for two 2024 Round 2 selections (currently 32 and 42) and two 2024 Round 3 selections (currently 43 and 45) in the 2024 Telstra AFL Draft.
---------
Carlton trade its 2024 Round 2 selection (currently 34) and 2024 Round 4 selection (currently 66) to Brisbane for its 2024 Round 4 selection (currently 73) and 2025 Round 2 selection in the 2024 and 2025 Telstra AFL Drafts respectively.
---------
Carlton trade its 2025 Round 1 selection and 2025 Round 2 selection (tied to Carlton) to Hawthorn for its 2024 Round 1 selection (currently 14) in the 2024 and 2025 Telstra AFL Drafts respectively.

 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Why don’t we just forget about Daniel and play Powell at half back? Ball magnet, good decision maker and user. Too slow for the midfield.
Half backs should be your best kicks of the footy. With defensive and offensive capabilities. Should also have some dash while we are at it. Powell is not a half back, Kerch can play it but lacks some defensive qualities and honestly would be too good elsewhere. Tucker is a better half back than Powell is
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Don't recall. It was one of the last two years. Maybe we saw it as pick 4 because we knew Walter would go before our pick 3. Anyway, the idea was introduced and a whole lot of people got their trousers in a twist about the idea of it. Genuine anger and angst at a scenario that was very obviously entirely made-up.

We need to relax on here. It's not talented youngsters that we're short on
I definitely think it’s talented KPF’s we are short on. IMO we should be doing everything in our power to get 2 KPF’s in the door.
Giving up 25 for the complete antithesis of that seems ludicrous to me.
Daniel = Do Not Want.
 
If we don’t have at least 2 picks in the top 25 then I’ll class this period as a dismal failure.

Realistically we need 4 picks inside 40, and we should be finding ways to do that without sacrificing our F1.

I’m dreading tomorrow.
fox broadcasting cheers GIF by Empire FOX
 
I think GWS more likely. After the bolton trade, Freo won't trade 11 and 30 as it would leave them with only 67 in this draft. GWS have 7 picks, so could see them doing F1 for 15/16.

And surely we can get special consideration to trade out a F2 as well. We've had plenty of first round picks in recent years.
Freo said they were open to moving 11 forward. I suspect to have the picks for Warner next year.
GWS an option but said they "want to make sure they get the players they want" before trading out.
I'd probably prefer to hold onto the F1 myself, but just going off what Brady said at the start of trade period about splitting 2 or moving the F1 forward for a player or picks (maybe we are that keen on Trainor or somebody in the teens).
My preference would be to split 2 if we want to generate another pick in the teens for the record.
 
I definitely think it’s talented KPF’s we are short on. IMO we should be doing everything in our power to get 2 KPF’s in the door.
Giving up 25 for the complete antithesis of that seems ludicrous to me.
Daniel = Do Not Want.
Yeah well, we're also short on natural rebounding half-back flankers, somehow. Agree that the forward line needs to be the main target area, but yknow, by the time a drafted key forward is developed enough, Larkey will be about 29. I guess the saving grace is that with his game style, he could go till 35 easily.

The shortest pathway to a solid two key pillars will be Comben forward and all fingers, limbs and muscles crossed that he stays healthy, that Maley comes on, and that Goad shows something as a forward
 
Yeah well, we're also short on natural rebounding half-back flankers, somehow. Agree that the forward line needs to be the main target area, but yknow, by the time a drafted key forward is developed enough, Larkey will be about 29. I guess the saving grace is that with his game style, he could go till 35 easily.

The shortest pathway to a solid two key pillars will be Comben forward and all fingers, limbs and muscles crossed that he stays healthy, that Maley comes on, and that Goad shows something as a forward
I’m of the opinion we’ve got 2 ready to go in Hardeman and Goater, all things going to plan with injuries etc. Daniel is more of a distributer than a back flanker. Can’t defend.
 
If we're not targeting mids in the draft, I wouldn't be surprised if we're planning on picking up another 2nd rounder by sliding from 2.

Like 2 > 6 + 23 / 24 + 51 from Richmond.

It would still get us Tauru, for example, but it means we could get a good KPF and Daniel, plus maybe something else. (51 becomes 30-something on the night.)
 
If we're not targeting mids in the draft, I wouldn't be surprised if we're planning on picking up another 2nd rounder by sliding from 2.

Like 2 > 6 + 23 / 24 + 51 from Richmond.

It would still get us Tauru, for example, but it means we could get a good KPF and Daniel, plus maybe something else. 51 becomes 30-something on the night.
We'd want more than a 2nd rounder to move from 2. It has to be a good deal.
 
Due to the lack of a "what ifs" thread, I have decided to drop this here.
Things would've been so much different if we got what we paid for with CCJ and Sleevo. About 80 goals a year different.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yeah well, we're also short on natural rebounding half-back flankers, somehow. Agree that the forward line needs to be the main target area, but yknow, by the time a drafted key forward is developed enough, Larkey will be about 29. I guess the saving grace is that with his game style, he could go till 35 easily.

The shortest pathway to a solid two key pillars will be Comben forward and all fingers, limbs and muscles crossed that he stays healthy, that Maley comes on, and that Goad shows something as a forward
We'll need a few developing in the VFL regardless of Larkey's age. Darling/Larkey/Comben/Teakle for the now.
Age hasn't stopped Caddy or Logan Morris being able to step in quicker than expected if they are good enough.
 
We'd want more than a 2nd rounder to move from 2. It has to be a good deal.
Perhaps.

There haven't been many signs of teams willing to give up multiple first rounders to move up yet, such is the evenness of the draft. So I have this lingering thing in the back of my mind, where I refuse to believe we aren't going to draft a KPF, but with 25 looking like it could be destined to WB, I'm trying to figure out how it happens without us sliding down from 2.

Maybe WB will relent on giving back 35 with Daniel, but I'm not confident.
 
I definitely think it’s talented KPF’s we are short on. IMO we should be doing everything in our power to get 2 KPF’s in the door.
Giving up 25 for the complete antithesis of that seems ludicrous to me.
Daniel = Do Not Want.
This is my sticking point too, I’m not against getting Daniel but not for pick 25 there will be a few KPFs at that pick. Even if we split pick 2 we’d be mad not to take a KPF at 25.
 
This is my sticking point too, I’m not against getting Daniel but not for pick 25 there will be a few KPFs at that pick. Even if we split pick 2 we’d be mad not to take a KPF at 25.
I think Daniel would be a good acquisition but I find it hard to believe we're prepared to put 25 on the table if we haven't come up with a strategy to find a replacement pick that gets us a good key forward.

Maybe I was being slightly pessimistic in my previous post, maybe the deal would be something like 2 for 6 and 18.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top