List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part II

Remove this Banner Ad

That’s just your opinion.

So you believe no matter what we finish bottom 3 next year?

Even with a good draft and trade result?

It would be a miraculous turnaround to get anything more than 5-6 wins next year which would still most likely see us in the bottom 4.

Again, someone like Houston would barely move the needle for us. He had a good year but is being severely overrated.
 
It would be a miraculous turnaround to get anything more than 5-6 wins next year which would still most likely see us in the bottom 4.

Again, someone like Houston would barely move the needle for us. He had a good year but is being severely overrated.
but what about if Houston is combined with Parker, Darling, Konstanty and maybe 1 other coming across as well?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

but what about if Houston is combined with Parker, Darling, Konstanty and maybe 1 other coming across as well?

We brought in Logue, Shiels & Tucker in one off-season and it didn't do much for us. They may improve us somewhat but thinking that adding two players at the end of their careers, a guy who hasn't even played a game yet, and a HBF will jumpstart our performances by a significant amount is wishful thinking IMO.

If we trade a top 3 pick it should be for a match winner.
 
We brought in Logue, Shiels & Tucker in one off-season and it didn't do much for us. They may improve us somewhat but thinking that adding two players at the end of their careers, a guy who hasn't even played a game yet, and a HBF will jumpstart our performances by a significant amount is wishful thinking IMO.

If we trade a top 3 pick it should be for a match winner.
Lucky Houston is a match winner then.
 
We brought in Logue, Shiels & Tucker in one off-season and it didn't do much for us. They may improve us somewhat but thinking that adding two players at the end of their careers, a guy who hasn't even played a game yet, and a HBF will jumpstart our performances by a significant amount is wishful thinking IMO.

If we trade a top 3 pick it should be for a match winner.
 
We brought in Logue, Shiels & Tucker in one off-season and it didn't do much for us. They may improve us somewhat but thinking that adding two players at the end of their careers, a guy who hasn't even played a game yet, and a HBF will jumpstart our performances by a significant amount is wishful thinking IMO.

If we trade a top 3 pick it should be for a match winner.
The way we've picked for the last ten years I think we should be happy with a dual all Australian at the peak of his powers.
 
Parker is almost certainly joining us!
Excellent source, something would have to change dramatically for it not to.
Jack Nicholson Yes GIF
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part II

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top