- Thread starter
- #7,476
Whoops, I thought they still had 12 and 14They’re not taking him at pick 3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whoops, I thought they still had 12 and 14They’re not taking him at pick 3
Like how the slime paid pick 3 for Owies3 first rounders for Bolton. We should expect to hear that a lot going forward.
For better or for worse, once the floor was set at 10 + 18 and the ceiling was 10 + 11, was always gonna end up in btwn. I would've preferred if it was 10 + 18 but then we give like a F2 to keep 11 intact. But I guess btwn future trade priorities + NGAs next year they didn't want to nerf their future draft hand.I'm surprised anyone is still surprised or angry 11 was involved.
It was obvious on day 1 we'd fold and include 11. I thought it might be 10 and 11 with 24 back, valuing him at 5. In the end according to someone above this values him at 4. So instead of 18 and 24 we now have 14 and a F3.
It's acceptable, as Fat Nyfe said above the aim is to win flags not trades. We've got an absolute A grader
Like how the slime paid pick 3 for Owies
I agree, but he had 4 years to run on his contract & I assume they’re paying a chunk of his salary. They’d have a fair bit of room in there.Very happy having Bolton, but there's no sugar coating we overpaid again. To not get a pick in the 20's or 30's back is weak from Wallsy.
#14 is still a good shot at Berry, so not a bad result overall, but highlights how we again overpaid to bring a player home.
My preference was to slide both 11>14 and 18>24, but the Future 3 which will likely fall around 39-42 is a handy pick. Also we can use the Freo F3 with pick 30 to move up or combine with 67 to move up on draft night. It’s looking like 30 will only slide back a couple of spots because Brisbane have 29 to use on Ashcroft and Essendon have 28 to use on Kako.Pick 18 had nothing to do with Schultz. And the luck on the Schultz trade doesn’t really change anything - Pick 11 is Pick 11 no matter how it got to the club.
Having said all that I fail to see how this trade is that much worse than Picks 10 and 18 was.
Pick 37 next year will be handy for us if our NGA guys are much good and/or if we trade our first rounder for a gun player.
Well let’s do some analysis. Who could pick up Berry as pics before us. I genuinely think Richmond will pick and Barry with 11 have so many chances to pick up midfielders defenders. Barry will be sitting in the middle of all pics.Very happy having Bolton, but there's no sugar coating we overpaid again. To not get a pick in the 20's or 30's back is weak from Wallsy.
#14 is still a good shot at Berry, so not a bad result overall, but highlights how we again overpaid to bring a player home
Maybe we got this done early on Deadline to get something done late in the day? Highly unlikely though.So are we now officially done this trade period?
If we make a GF not one of us will give a flying …. about the what-iffs of Shay’s Trade, best guy we could ever get and wowee look out Optus, he goes bonkers every time he’s on there, he’s gonna own it!People are forgetting the goal is to win a flag, not collect picks and draft points forever.
Unlike others, I am not convinced should be played as a forward pocket.
As long as we can priortise this need through the draft, I can tolerate the trade.
Berry, Hannaford, ......
I would like us to draft two players who can play as a forward pocket.
Allen can go to Methcoast. Don’t rate him as a top 20 draftee11 becomes super important with West Coast now receiving pick 12 from Carlton in the pick 3 split/Baker trade. It means we get to decide who we want directly before West Coast at 12, which could potentially be Bo Allen, the pick of the West Australians this year. To get Bolton and still be ahead of West Coast in the draft, after the year they've had, would be absolutely delicious, and might i say, imperative. To trade 10, 11 and 18 out for 14 and therefore move to behind the Eagle's pick 12 in the draft, would for me, be a complete disaster and dealbreaker.
Casual Vic footy fans suggesting this trade aren't aware of the Bo Allen factor...because...well..tbh they dont know anything about upcoming WAFL talent.
We will have our 2025,26,27 picks to use.Can anyone explain what draft capital we have at our hands to lure a Warner/Pickett next year? The only extra pick I'm aware of is the F3 we've just nabbed from Richmond, but I'm not too across all this.
Surely we don't have the picks to get it done without trading our 14/30 into next year or am I missing something?
Allen can go to Methcoast. Don’t rate him as a top 20 draftee
We don't need to go overboard on drafting small forward pockets. Would be happy enough with one from the draft (my preference is Hannaford), but we've still got Bolton, Switta, Freddy, Simpson, Delean. Possibly Kozzie is now properly in play to join his cousin Bolton.
I would argue that medium types like Davis and Hynes are perhaps an even bigger need, especially when you look at the grand finalists who only play 1 small forward each and lean more towards medium and/or midfield types (Lohmann, Ah Chee, Rayner, Hayward, Parker, Heeney). All we have is Sturt and then guys we don't want near the side in Banfield and Emmett.