Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
.12 and 14 is unders and not great trading. As a rebuilding club, to make up some of the value lost on a 28 year old small forward no one wanted and then spend almost half the capital on a 27 year old role player is beyond abysmal. It's just flat out horrific stuff.
I can't wait to hear Ellis talk about it on HBG.
Second clubWC might be the first club trolled into pulling out of a trade.
Expecting a backflip first thing in the morning
Was it reasonably confirmed that fan pressure made Port do a backflip or just speculation? Sincere question.Second club
Port copped it about 6 hours ago lol
That was their own fans only tho
Was it reasonably confirmed that fan pressure made Port do a backflip or just speculation? Sincere question.
Surely there's more to it?
I reckon there must be a bunch of 2nd/3rd rounds chucked in to make it worthwhile.
It's a bit rich by Port fans when this is basically the same scenario for JHF where they only gave up 9 and 20 for JHF and Rioli because GWS did this godfather deal to get pick 1 and Port were the main beneficiaries.I think they agreed to it and then went home and googled who Atkins was and then changed their mind
I actually don’t know, but I wouldn’t be surprised if all this negatively has got WC in a spin
If it’s 10 and 11 we have to get 20 back
Because they want Baker and can’t get it done with 3 or 30. They’re definitely doing this and it’s hilariousWonder if the Eagles put it out there to see the reaction. Reaction is nothing but negative. Would not be surprised they do a Port and backtrack on this one. Why not draft with pick 3 in a rebuilding side who 2 to 3 years away from finals.
We need two quality players for our list, both good mid / fwd types who can kick goals, and we have three picks to get them. It's not about who is worth what, it's about being willing to spend all three of our top picks to get two players in of sufficient quality. Bolton and Baker are of sufficient quality, but 10 and 11 for Bolton would only leave us 18. I'm guessing our management value Baker higher than that.ngl your offer to us is weird
10 and 11 is too high for Bolton apparently
You value him at 10 and 18, fair enough
Then you offer us 10,11, 18 for Bolton and Baker?
This means you value Baker at 11? I don’t get it that’s bigger overs than Bolton.