USA 2024 US Presidential Election: Trump vs Harris (pt II)

[happy_eagle]

Yeah - she should have.

But the left and identity / race politics go together like strawberries and cream. And they simply don't understand that the majority are sick and tired of this woke garbage.

And that is what will lead to their inevitable electoral downfall.

You think Trump wins the popular vote?

 

[CM86]

The crypto thing is a bit weird.

Otherwise, she should've just done this for everybody and avoid the inevitable backlash that's coming (from people who are and aren't black men alike).

Sorry, are you saying that the plan is to only protect cryptocurrency investments for black men?

As opposed to protecting cryptocurrency investments for all Americans including black men, which this specific 'press release' is all about?


What are you actually against in this?







Why would anyone side with Nick Fuentes on this??
Why would anyone help Fuentes muddy the waters on this???

 

[geoffjennings79]

I seriously hope Trumpism dies a horrible death without too much collateral damage

Trumpism... or Trump?

 

[geoffjennings79]

Get ready for a false flag event to be pulled in a desperate attempt for the Dems to steal this election.

Your mates pulled a virus to screw Trump over, you’ve tried killing him twice all whilst you lie and lie about countless things.

Whatever lever they pull, it’ll be designed to screw Trump as they attempt to keep their power because Trump will jail these freaks and end their rort

You really are just a f***ing nutcase, aren't you? Sad.

 

[Gainzo]

I haven't posted in a bit so I thought I would give an update on what is going on in New Hampshire. There are way more signs for local candidates than there are for Trump or Harris.

I'm pretty sure Harris is going to win here. In 2016 and 2020 there were Trump signs and flags everywhere. Not so much now.

Even though NH only has 4 Electoral College votes I think they are going to matter.

 

[Swan4Life]

You think Trump wins the popular vote?

I think it will be close.

But even some Dems and independents would be horrified at the thought of a policy proposal that is based on race. That was my point.

There are people in the US who are struggling to put food on the table who would be anything from unimpressed to absolutely livid at such a proposal.

 

[Swan4Life]

I haven't posted in a bit so I thought I would give an update on what is going on in New Hampshire. There are way more signs for local candidates than there are for Trump or Harris.

I'm pretty sure Harris is going to win here. In 2016 and 2020 there were Trump signs and flags everywhere. Not so much now.

Even though NH only has 4 Electoral College votes I think they are going to matter.

NH is a safe as houses Dem state and will have zero impact on the final result.

 

[CM86]

I think it will be close.

But even some Dems and independents would be horrified at the thought of a policy proposal that is based on race. That was my point.

There are people in the US who are struggling to put food on the table who would be anything from unimpressed to absolutely livid at such a proposal.

You think the popular vote will be close??


Can you pick a single one of these proposals that you think is the worst and inexcusable, and explain why?

Or is it just that you believe any form of affirmative action is bigotry??

 

[Gainzo]

NH is a safe as houses Dem state and will have zero impact on the final result.

New Hampshire is a weird State. The majority of people that live in Southern NH work in Massachusetts. The population base in NH is in the Southern part of the State.

The Trump faction is up North with blokes driving utes they can't afford. These idiots blame the Democrats for their $900 a month truck payment.

 

[CM86]

Incredible.
Most hated person on earth since Adolf.
But American people are so stupid they keep voting for him.
He's up against a dark skinned female lay down mizare winner and still has a chance.
Just a mind boggling country full of nitwits.

You're a guff machine.

 

[spinynorman]

Sorry, are you saying that the plan is to only protect cryptocurrency investments for black men?

As opposed to protecting cryptocurrency investments for all Americans including black men, which this specific 'press release' is all about?


What are you actually against in this?

View attachment 2145195





Why would anyone side with Nick Fuentes on this??
Why would anyone help Fuentes muddy the waters on this???

The conversation later said that it is for everyone and the consensus was that Kamal’s post is clumsily worded. No need to go implying that I’m a white supremacist.

 

[CM86]

The conversation later said that it is for everyone and the consensus was that Kamal’s post is clumsily worded. No need to go implying that I’m a white supremacist.

It's clear in the wording.

Did you not read it?
Did you spend 30 seconds looking for any more information, before helping to muddy the water with your post?


No.
Ah well.

Easier to blame "Kamal"...

So there isn't actually anything in this that you oppose, it was just you misunderstanding the written words?




And instead of pausing to wonder how you ended up supporting the same messaging as Fuentes, you're just straight to being a victim, and I'm the one who needs to do better.

Ridiculous.

 

[spinynorman]

It's clear in the wording.

Did you not read it?
Did you spend 30 seconds looking for any more information, before helping to muddy the water with your post?


No.
Ah well.

Easier to blame "Kamal"...

So there isn't actually anything in this that you oppose, it was just you misunderstanding the written words?

View attachment 2145234


And instead of pausing to wonder how you ended up supporting the same messaging as Fuentes, you're just straight to being a victim, and I'm the one who needs to do better.

Ridiculous.

Sorry that my phone autocorrected Kamala to Kamal. I’ll do better in my war against Apple.

I have no idea what David Fuentes said in relation to this. Obviously I don’t follow him at all. Care to link it so I can compare what I say to what he said and I can defend myself? Until you do show the actual same messaging, then yes, you do need to do better.

Either way, this is totally unnecessary and was settled before you decided you wanted to take a worst faith reading of a post so you could have a fight.

 

[CM86]

Sorry that my phone autocorrected Kamala to Kamal. I’ll do better in my war against Apple.

I have no idea what David Fuentes said in relation to this. Obviously I don’t follow him at all. Care to link it so I can compare what I say to what he said and I can defend myself? Until you do show the actual same messaging, then yes, you do need to do better.

Either way, this is totally unnecessary and was settled before you decided you wanted to take a worst faith reading of a post so you could have a fight.

Now that you've actually understood what was being proposed, can you show me the post where you've shown any support for it?
Oh there is none?

Why would anyone side with Nick Fuentes on this??

Fuentes is pushing that this is a racist policy, aimed at only helping black men.
He's in the comments of the tweet, along with all the other dipshits attacking it as racist.


Considering how far left you're supposed to be, how have you not said a single word of support for this?


Just pause and reflect for a moment. How can you have been tricked into such a basic level misunderstanding, and jumped into opposing it, and adding to the confusion that it's racist?

Why are you so desperate to look for reasons to oppose it? Seemingly without any critical thought?
Just reactive attacks on something that you should be defending and supporting.
It's my fault? Someone else's? Or is it possible that you've become ideologically captured to some degree?

 

[Ghost Patrol]

HUGE if true

 

[spinynorman]

Now that you've actually understood what was being proposed, can you show me the post where you've shown any support for it?
Oh there is none?

I don't think supporting crypto is left wing. I think most of the rest of this is tampering around the edges but it isn't egregious, so I don't support it but don't oppose either.

Fuentes is pushing that this is a racist policy, aimed at only helping black men.
He's in the comments of the tweet, along with all the other dipshits attacking it as racist.


Considering how far left you're supposed to be, how have you not said a single word of support for this?


Just pause and reflect for a moment. How can you have been tricked into such a basic level misunderstanding, and jumped into opposing it, and adding to the confusion that it's racist?

Why are you so desperate to look for reasons to oppose it? Seemingly without any critical thought?
Just reactive attacks on something that you should be defending and supporting.
It's my fault? Someone else's? Or is it possible that you've become ideologically captured to some degree?

Show me where I said it was racist.

 

[CM86]

I don't think supporting crypto is left wing. I think most of the rest of this is tampering around the edges but it isn't egregious, so I don't support it but don't oppose either.

It isn't about supporting crypto, it's about supporting people who have been taken advantage of by crypto investments. Of which Black Americans are over-represented in.

Again, you're desperate to misread basic English in order to oppose this.

This is designed to help people who are losing money in the scams. Not to help the scams.


You've been vocal in opposition.
But you can't see anything to support in this. For whatever reason.


https://www.npr.org/2024/10/13/nx-s1-5151968/harris-weed-crypto

• Legalizing recreational marijuana and providing opportunities for Black Americans to succeed in the industry
• 1 million fully forgivable loans of up to $20,000 for Black entrepreneurs and others to start businesses
• a plan come up with rules for cryptocurrency and other digital assets; more than 20% of Black Americans own or have owned cryptocurrency assets, according to the campaign
• invest more in Black male teachers, promote registered apprenticeships and credentialing opportunities in Black communities and investing in leadership training and mentorship programs like My Brother’s Keeper
• a National Health Equity Initiative focused on Black Men that addresses sickle cell disease, diabetes, mental health, prostate cancer, and other health challenges that disproportionately affect them

Show me where I said it was racist.

Can you show me where I said that you said that, so I can correct my post.

 

[spinynorman]

It isn't about supporting crypto, it's about supporting people who have been taken advantage of by crypto investments. Of which Black Americans are over-represented in.

Again, you're desperate to misread basic English in order to oppose this.

This is designed to help people who are losing money in the scams. Not to help the scams.


But you can't see anything to support in this. For whatever reason.

https://www.npr.org/2024/10/13/nx-s1-5151968/harris-weed-crypto

• Legalizing recreational marijuana and providing opportunities for Black Americans to succeed in the industry
• 1 million fully forgivable loans of up to $20,000 for Black entrepreneurs and others to start businesses
• a plan come up with rules for cryptocurrency and other digital assets; more than 20% of Black Americans own or have owned cryptocurrency assets, according to the campaign
• invest more in Black male teachers, promote registered apprenticeships and credentialing opportunities in Black communities and investing in leadership training and mentorship programs like My Brother’s Keeper
• a National Health Equity Initiative focused on Black Men that addresses sickle cell disease, diabetes, mental health, prostate cancer, and other health challenges that disproportionately affect them

Legalising recreational marijuana is good.

The rest are varying degrees of meh.

The framing is clumsy. That error's on her campaign, which also had Obama go out and say "You're probably a misogynist, but vote Kamala" (that's a reductive quote, by the way, not literal, before it's taken that way). Bad faith actors will exploit that bad messaging, but it shouldn't be so hard to differentiate.

Can you show me where I said that you said that, so I can correct my post.

You said I'm siding with Nick Fuentes. When asked what he said, you said that he said it's a racist policy.

 

[Gough]

It's always when whitey feels he's missing out on something that the shit hits the fan.

 

[CM86]

Legalising recreational marijuana is good.

The rest are varying degrees of meh.

The framing is clumsy. That error's on her campaign, which also had Obama go out and say "You're probably a misogynist, but vote Kamala" (that's a reductive quote, by the way, not literal, before it's taken that way). Bad faith actors will exploit that bad messaging, but it shouldn't be so hard to differentiate.



You said I'm siding with Nick Fuentes. When asked what he said, you said that he said it's a racist policy.

OK.

As long as we're both aware how dishonest you're being, we can leave it there.

Bad faith actors will exploit that bad messaging

Insightful.