2nd Test Australia v West Indies Jan 25-29 1430hrs @ the Gabba

Who will win?


  • Total voters
    47
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Gambling on what? Missing out on a guy who's played 25 tests and averages 33?

You don't pick a number four because he rolls the arm over a bit ffs.

He has the same test stats as Stokes did at the same time, boy people are impatient here. Had one innings last test got a good ball (it can happen), poor shot first innings this test, and he’s not out right now. People are expecting the bloke to be prime Jacques Kallis and if he isn’t they want to replace the bloke with a sub 30’s cricketer
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yep, and has been rewarded.

And how much rope does he get, averaging 33 over 25 tests gets him the plumb #4 position?
Yes the guy averaging 50 in shield cricket when the rest of shield cricket is ass at the moment is going to get more than 2 tests to prove himself at 4.

He has been okay although not spectacular to start his test career. He gets more time simply because he has more talent than anyone else waiting in the wings
 
He has the same test stats as Stokes did at the same time, boy people are impatient here. Had one innings last test got a good ball (it can happen), poor shot first innings this test, and he’s not out right now. People are expecting the bloke to be prime Jacques Kallis and if he isn’t they want to replace the bloke with a sub 30’s cricketer

He's batting number four, the comparisons aren't all rounders any more.
 
How many available players average more than Green at Test level, or if they are uncapped average more than him at FC level?

Not Bancroft, not Renshaw, not Harris. So forget them.

At Test level it's Handscomb, Pucovski, Patterson and maybe Burns if he's available. Patterson only played 2 tests and averages 37 at FC level

Green's average of 33 isn't huge but he averages more than Carey and Mitch Marsh.

Why would we promote someone from a lower level that at a lower level performs worse than Green?
 
Yes the guy averaging 50 in shield cricket when the rest of shield cricket is ass at the moment is going to get more than 2 tests to prove himself at 4.

He has been okay although not spectacular to start his test career. He gets more time simply because he has more talent than anyone else waiting in the wings

He was a failed number six, why do we need prolonged exposure to work out he's a failed number four?
 
How many available players average more than Green at Test level, or if they are uncapped average more than him at FC level?

Not Bancroft, not Renshaw, not Harris. So forget them.

At Test level it's Handscomb, Pucovski, Patterson and maybe Burns if he's available.

Green's average of 33 isn't huge but he averages more than Carey and Mitch Marsh.

Why would we promote someone from a lower level that at a lower level performs worse than Green?

Same arguments were rolled out for keeping him over Mitch Marsh, history didn't exactly vindicate that.
 
He's batting number four, the comparisons aren't all rounders any more.

He is a batsman who bowls but you are being highly impatient. Give him a full year, we can be patient, have NZ next.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

2nd Test Australia v West Indies Jan 25-29 1430hrs @ the Gabba

Back
Top