- Apr 17, 2007
- 27,495
- 51,063
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- hellas,liverpool,storm,au
Going to go all daicos this season in the midfield- probably guy that kept Phillips out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like he did last year by playing half back in the last praccy game in the second half onlyReckon he's playing majority hb.
Why would Clarko train him all season in the backline, play both practice matches off hb only to suddenly change him round 1. He'll be our main playmaker off half back with stints in the midfield.
Worked last year when he trained all preseason as a hf.Reckon he's playing majority hb.
Why would Clarko train him all season in the backline, play both practice matches off hb only to suddenly change him round 1. He'll be our main playmaker off half back with stints in the midfield.
Reckon Harry could do anything asked of him.Worked last year when he trained all preseason as a hf.
Reckon Harry could do anything asked of him.
Played a bit of hb against Richmond in the praccy last year, looked lost. A week later looked much better, the next week got the pill 30+ times.
He's a quick learner.
Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk
carpooling with the warlord last year was all the development he requires, those two building symmetry is what’s going to shoot us up the ladder.Reckon Harry could do anything asked of him.
Played a bit of hb against Richmond in the praccy last year, looked lost. A week later looked much better, the next week got the pill 30+ times.
He's a quick learner.
Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk
I don't think we should move him away from HB, McKercher and Fisher are not as good defensively as he is. He's extremely underrated in that regard and we need him back there.
I would be more inclined to get Kerch in the middle and leave Sheez back.I don't think we should move him away from HB, McKercher and Fisher are not as good defensively as he is. He's extremely underrated in that regard and we need him back there.
That's for damn sure. Harry added aggression to his game yesterday. I'm hoping Clarko unleashes him as a midfielder resting forward starting this week. McKercher can relieve him off HB.He's physically ready.
most meters gained of the round!Everyone gets seduced by the numbers, but I thought he was just ok. He got a lot of it but wasn't very damaging. Only 1 score involvement
Everyone gets seduced by the numbers, but I thought he was just ok. He got a lot of it but wasn't very damaging. Only 1 score involvement
He took 5 kick ins, I can't be bothered looking but I'm guessing he ran 20m and kicked it 50m, there's half his metres gained for the game.most meters gained of the round!
Really good points. Especially the 70 metres gained by kick ins.He took 5 kick ins, I can't be bothered looking but I'm guessing he ran 20m and kicked it 50m, there's half his metres gained for the game.
Of his 32 disposals, 7 were turnovers and 5 were kick-ins.
I'm not criticising him, I'm just saying that we often get seduced by looking at the stats. He was okay, personally I'd rather see what he can do on ball and in the forward half.
They're just guessing that number so its not a good point.Really good points. Especially the 70 metres gained by kick ins.
Harry was still our second best player after Big X.
I'd like to see a breakdown of the metres gained from kick ins. It could be a very good point.They're just guessing that number so its not a good point.
Absolutely.They're just guessing that number so its not a good point.
It’s a weird stat, say he kicks it straight across the ground to an open player who takes who takes it all the way down the ground that registers as 0 metres gained, but down the line to a pack where it’s knocked out of play is +40-50. Seems flawedI'd like to see a breakdown of the metres gained from kick ins. It could be a very good point.
Regardless of the result. He's still a gun and already arguably our best player.