Yep, there is probably a run there.Just saw it, easy single there and was his call!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, there is probably a run there.Just saw it, easy single there and was his call!
No because Tim David has a golden ticket.
Inglis is making quick runs at the top of the order currently and I think he could do so down the order if he was asked to, and probably more reliably than David.Different positions. Honestly he’s not competing with those players he’s scored all his runs up the top (top 4). I can’t stand David but it shows how VERY few genuine hitter finishers we have.
PhatBoy come and explain this performance, the Dettol Cup deserves better.
thats why Wade is still in the t20 squad because of his finishingDifferent positions. Honestly he’s not competing with those players he’s scored all his runs up the top (top 4). I can’t stand David but it shows how VERY few genuine hitter finishers we have.
Inglis is making quick runs at the top of the order currently and I think he could do so down the order if he was asked to, and probably more reliably than David.
and this is the issue for Australia how are you going to manage your assests..in the t20 formatInglis is making quick runs at the top of the order currently and I think he could do so down the order if he was asked to, and probably more reliably than David.
For a long time, Bill Lawry was the only Australian ODI captain with a 100% winning record.As we know, today is the 1000th ODI involving Australia. Bill Lawry opened the batting with Keith Stackpole in Australia's first ever ODI back in 1971. Bill had a strike rate of 55. JFM, the total opposite of Bill Lawry finished with a strike rate of 227. None of you will be surprised at Geoff Boycott leaving the MCG with a strike rate of 21 in that inaugural ODI.
Your lucky I dont have a job.Just finished work & checked the scores
I guess I won’t be watching Cricket tonight
For a long time, Bill Lawry was the only Australian ODI captain with a 100% winning record.
Has been joined in recent years by Cameron White, David Warner and Josh Hazlewood, though.
Your lucky I dont have a job.
Hookesy had a 100% loss record as captain.For a long time, Bill Lawry was the only Australian ODI captain with a 100% winning record.
Has been joined in recent years by Cameron White, David Warner and Josh Hazlewood, though.
Nah people are exhausted with short form cricket from BBL, they've screwed the duck forever on this now.if you play 9 T20I around the country involving West Indies v Australia, dare I say it you would get maybe on par crowds with the BBL averages maybe 20% less- but it would still be a massive win for Cricket Australia.
As does Ray Bright, Michael Hussey and Tim Paine. Hookes and Bright only had one game each, but Hussey had four and Paine five. Paine's was the first cricket after the Sandpaper tour, I think, and included conceding 481 vs England.Hookesy had a 100% loss record as captain.
Ray Bright and Hooksey were always the outliers of ODI captains from the times when the Test and ODI sides were pretty much one and the sameAs does Ray Bright, Michael Hussey and Tim Paine. Hookes and Bright only had one game each, but Hussey had four and Paine five. Paine's was the first cricket after the Sandpaper tour, I think, and included conceding 481 vs England.
so if Australia won 4-0, then we lose 3 games? they won't do a "best of" series. 5 games max should be the limit for a series.A best of 7 series in T20I , would have been better than 3 ODI:3T20 setup. And if you really wanted to cash in on the T20 loop, you could have a best of 9 T20 series, with Melbourne and Sydney hosting multiple games (being the bigger cities) and spreading the games across the nation. I dont think its an unreasonable thing to schedule back-to-back games in some cities in T20s. The crowds for this ODI series were hardly inspiring but also been on the decline for a while.
Are we slowly seeing the death of bilateral series in this country in ODI form? Teams no longer see the value of playing their best squads and I can understand it with the series not meaning much in terms of an international context.
garbage mate.A best of 7 series in T20I , would have been better than 3 ODI:3T20 setup. And if you really wanted to cash in on the T20 loop, you could have a best of 9 T20 series, with Melbourne and Sydney hosting multiple games (being the bigger cities) and spreading the games across the nation. I dont think its an unreasonable thing to schedule back-to-back games in some cities in T20s. The crowds for this ODI series were hardly inspiring but also been on the decline for a while.
Are we slowly seeing the death of bilateral series in this country in ODI form? Teams no longer see the value of playing their best squads and I can understand it with the series not meaning much in terms of an international context.
Yep. In the glorious summer of 1984-85, Australia played 16 ODIs at home: the 10 WSC group games (vs West Indies and Sri Lanka), three WSC finals (lost the best of three series 1-2) and the three group matches in the World Championship of Cricket. The total could have been 18 ODIs if Australia had finished top two in their WCC group and played the semi-final plus either the final or 3rd place match.WSC was ten games each plus finals at that point wasn't it? So, 12-13 ODIs at home would have been common with 8-9 of those in Sydney and Melbourne.
A best of 7 series in T20I , would have been better than 3 ODI:3T20 setup. And if you really wanted to cash in on the T20 loop, you could have a best of 9 T20 series, with Melbourne and Sydney hosting multiple games (being the bigger cities) and spreading the games across the nation. I dont think its an unreasonable thing to schedule back-to-back games in some cities in T20s. The crowds for this ODI series were hardly inspiring but also been on the decline for a while.
Are we slowly seeing the death of bilateral series in this country in ODI form? Teams no longer see the value of playing their best squads and I can understand it with the series not meaning much in terms of an international context.
Best Pete Smith voiceso are Fox Cricket showing Lethal Weapon?