Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 7 - Trump takes full responsibility.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I found this interesting from a conservative...



He even supplied the following as a footnote in his letter:

2 See A Sitting Presidents Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution, 24 Op. O.L.C. 222 (2000).


We've seen a summary written by Trumps own man. Thats it! Wowee!!!

Anyway, I'm waiting for the main event. 'Show me the money'!!!! :)
 
You know who wall street hates? Elizabeth warren. AOC. Bernie sanders. The people who want more regulation, higher taxes on the rich, raise the minimum wage etc etc.
Lol Elizabeth Warren ditched the Republicans for Democrats because she believed they were better for the market.

AOC and Bernie, definitely. Warren, she's nothing particularly progressive.
 
Why has it become “Russian agent”?

We know the Russian government used social media, among other things, in an attempt to manipulate the election. Nobody can seem to put a definite figure on how effective it was.

I always thought the issue was whether there was any proof Trump’s campaign was actively involved.

It's all spelled out in the DNC/HRC Dossier that was used by the FBI four times to con a surveillance warrant out of the Fisa Court starting in Oct 2016.

I think you'll be hearing more about it in the days and weeks ahead.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

We've seen a summary written by Trumps own man. Thats it! Wowee!!!

Anyway, I'm waiting for the main event. 'Show me the money'!!!! :)
Difficult to take a lot out of Barr's letter without the report, three things though:

1. Why did Barr’s chief of staff call White House counsel Emmet Flood at 3 p.m. Sunday to brief him on the report to Congress?
2. "This report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." and...
3. Although no-one in Trump's sphere was found to conspire with Russian government to interfere in the election, lots of evidence that 'actor/s' (funny word why not say people or individuals) did interfere? Further I very much doubt it wasn't without the knowledge or financial assistance from either the Russian government or those close to the government. Lots of resources and money needed for that.

Strange that the last one doesn't seem to matter to people.
 
Last edited:
Difficult to take a lot out of Barr's letter without the report, three things though:

1. Why did Barr’s chief of staff call White House counsel Emmet Flood at 3 p.m. Sunday to brief him on the report to Congress?
2. "This report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." and...
3. Although no-one in Trump's sphere was found to conspire with Russian government to interfere in the election, lots of evidence that 'actor/s' (funny word why not say people or individuals) did interfere? Further I very much doubt it wasn't without the knowledge or financial assistance from either the Russian government or those close to the government. Lots of resources and money needed for that.

Strange that the last one doesn't seem to matter to people.

We already know that nothing matters to the conned & the trolls.

Next stop, the money. Then reality.
 
Given Barr's letter/response to the report, can I do a Trumpian for those that thought Mueller and his 12 democrat lawyers were a plant and would come up with a biased report?

How about Barr and his memo of last year? Trump's insurance policy to put the best slant on the charge of 'obstruction of justice'?

https://www.lawfareblog.com/bill-barrs-very-strange-memo-obstruction-justice
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5638848-June-2018-Barr-Memo-to-DOJ-Muellers-Obstruction.html


Found this very interesting in Barr's letter:

'[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated
with the Russian government in its election interference activities.'

I wonder what preceded this quotation as it doesn't seem to be the beginning of a sentence if I remember my grammar rules correctly.
 
Last edited:
Given Barr's letter/response to the report, can I do a Trumpian for those that thought Mueller and his 12 democrat lawyers were a plant and would come up with a biased report?

How about Barr and his memo of last year? Trump's insurance policy to put the best slant of the charge of 'obstruction of justice'?

https://www.lawfareblog.com/bill-barrs-very-strange-memo-obstruction-justice
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5638848-June-2018-Barr-Memo-to-DOJ-Muellers-Obstruction.html

They won't respond to that. They're the Conned & the 'Invested'. ;)

They've read Trumps man Barrs summary, the bits they liked anyway, & have run away with that!!!! Like a puppy with an old slipper. Gone off they have.

Funeeeeee!!!! Its like watching a sitcom, live! :)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

They won't respond to that. They're the Conned & the 'Invested'. ;)

They've read Trumps man Barrs summary, the bits they liked anyway, & have run away with that!!!! Like a puppy with an old slipper. Gone off they have.

Funeeeeee!!!! Its like watching a sitcom, live! :)
This article sums it up well:

Good news, America. Russia helped install your president. But although he owes his job in large part to that help, the president did not conspire or collude with his helpers. He was the beneficiary of a foreign intelligence operation, but not an active participant in that operation. He received the stolen goods, but he did not conspire with the thieves in advance.

This is what Donald Trump’s administration and its enablers in Congress and the media are already calling exoneration. But it offers no reassurance to Americans who cherish the independence and integrity of their political process.

The question unanswered by the attorney general’s summary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report is: Why? Russian President Vladimir Putin took an extreme risk by interfering in the 2016 election as he did. Had Hillary Clinton won the presidency—the most likely outcome—Russia would have been exposed to fierce retaliation by a powerful adversary. The prize of a Trump presidency must have glittered alluringly, indeed, to Putin and his associates. Why?


Did they admire Trump’s anti-NATO, anti–European Union, anti-ally, pro–Bashar al-Assad, pro-Putin ideology?

Were they attracted by his contempt for the rule of law and dislike of democracy?

Did they hold compromising information about him, financial or otherwise?

Were there business dealings in the past, present, or future?

Or were they simply attracted by Trump’s general ignorance and incompetence, seeing him as a kind of wrecking ball to be smashed into the U.S. government and U.S. foreign policy?
 
Isn't it kind of ****ed up that some Americans are actually disappointed that their president wasn't proven to be a foreign agent? I understand hating Trump, but shouldn't you be relieved that your president didn't collude with a rival nation to rig an election? Like, that should be good news.
 
I haven't memorised the dossier nor hold it as important as you have, what did the dossier say in regard to those names?

It really is a shame that so many cheerleaders have dropped in as it would be interesting to discuss the report with some posters in good faith.
Accept how you, Chief and others have been wrong for two years and I’m sure some of us would be able to discuss in good faith.
 
Difficult to take a lot out of Barr's letter without the report, three things though:

1. Why did Barr’s chief of staff call White House counsel Emmet Flood at 3 p.m. Sunday to brief him on the report to Congress?
2. "This report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." and...
3. Although no-one in Trump's sphere was found to conspire with Russian government to interfere in the election, lots of evidence that 'actor/s' (funny word why not say people or individuals) did interfere? Further I very much doubt it wasn't without the knowledge or financial assistance from either the Russian government or those close to the government. Lots of resources and money needed for that.

Strange that the last one doesn't seem to matter to people.

That line is ridiculous , it does not even make sense.
 
You looney lefties really have a high opinion of yourselves don't you.

"we got him this time"....."IMPEACH", whine, whine, "IMPEACH", sob, sob, "IMPEACH"
Sydney supporters handled defeat in 2016 an order of magnitude better than the Democrats :$
 
Accept how you, Chief and others have been wrong for two years and I’m sure some of us would be able to discuss in good faith.
Care to detail 'the wrongs'?

Actually you would be the last poster that could ever discuss any topic in good faith. You only post to take 'pot, cheap shots' at others.
 
Isn't it kind of ****ed up that some Americans are actually disappointed that their president wasn't proven to be a foreign agent? I understand hating Trump, but shouldn't you be relieved that your president didn't collude with a rival nation to rig an election? Like, that should be good news.

No one actually believed he was a foreign agent. That was never the accusation, merely a joke people kept making.

But people just want this guy gone. He's just so bad on so many levels. Corruption, criminal history, ongoing crimes including OoJ, profiting off the presidency, accepting foreign money through his hotels, his 9000 lies, his love of dictators, he literally believes them over his own intelligence community. Putin didn't meddle, MBS didn't kill a journalist, etc.

You can go on and on about this guy. What about global warming isn't real because it's cold? Just when you think he's said the dumbest thing he could come up with, he goes and tops it next week. And people look up to him! He claims to be the most knowledgable person on the planet about drones, computers, technology,(plus 100 other things) things we know he knows SFA about! He's a bullshitter of the highest order. Which apparantly people like!

What about his dumbass policies like building a fckn wall that everyone knows won't work, and is a giant waste of money. Giving a giant tax cut to the rich, starting a trade war he doesn't know how to win. Guaranteed recession coming, which of course the real fiscal conservatives(D) will have to clean up.

There are a million others things wrong with this guy. It really is embarassing that anyone supports this inept orange buffoon.

So yeah, for people who have had enough of a moron in charge, it's frustrating that they don't get him on the shit WE KNOW HE ACTUALLY DID. He comitted OoJ, and admitted to it on camera. People have a right to be pissed at that.
 
This article sums it up well:

Good news, America. Russia helped install your president. But although he owes his job in large part to that help, the president did not conspire or collude with his helpers. He was the beneficiary of a foreign intelligence operation, but not an active participant in that operation. He received the stolen goods, but he did not conspire with the thieves in advance.

This is what Donald Trump’s administration and its enablers in Congress and the media are already calling exoneration. But it offers no reassurance to Americans who cherish the independence and integrity of their political process.

The question unanswered by the attorney general’s summary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report is: Why? Russian President Vladimir Putin took an extreme risk by interfering in the 2016 election as he did. Had Hillary Clinton won the presidency—the most likely outcome—Russia would have been exposed to fierce retaliation by a powerful adversary. The prize of a Trump presidency must have glittered alluringly, indeed, to Putin and his associates. Why?

Did they admire Trump’s anti-NATO, anti–European Union, anti-ally, pro–Bashar al-Assad, pro-Putin ideology?

Were they attracted by his contempt for the rule of law and dislike of democracy?

Did they hold compromising information about him, financial or otherwise?

Were there business dealings in the past, present, or future?

Or were they simply attracted by Trump’s general ignorance and incompetence, seeing him as a kind of wrecking ball to be smashed into the U.S. government and U.S. foreign policy?

All of the above.
 
Seriously cannot find a Trump supporter that isn't a troll.
Let us pause to remember the many good men lost! Of hard months living in the shadows, scrounging for a living while hunted remorselessly. We kept our humanity damnit!! Never lost hope. Gathering in small groups to sing joyous songs of freedom in our beautiful harmonizing voices, sharing our meagre rations! Vindicated in the defence of democracy and all thats righteous.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top