- Banned
- #1,151
He was appointed as a special prosecutor by people serving in Trump's DOJ.
He presented plenty of damaging evidence but ultimately followed DOJ guidelines.
Why do you need to distort the record?
Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 9 - The Shi'ites Hit The Fan (Cont. in Part 10, see OP)
- Thread starter iBeng
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
He presented plenty of damaging evidence but ultimately followed DOJ guidelines.
Why do you need to distort the record?
- Sep 21, 2009
- 18,238
- 16,702
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Ok, I'll sign up to the 2 year phone contract. It sounds like a great... waaaait a minute!!!
No. You spent years boasting about being a proud boy. Posting their ideology. Following the same "hide your power level" tactics.
You argued with me about the vetting procedure for pages.
A year later, when it's socially acceptable to point out what an insidious hate-mongering infestation they are, you call them scallywags... You've not changed your posting style at all, nor have you changed your stance on the issues.
You still think Gavin McInnes is viewed unfairly. And that the Proud Boys have no influence in Australia.
How many unprompted posts have you made, being genuinely negative about the Proud Boys or Gavin?
Compare that to how many posts you made promoting them, supporting them, and using them to influence others...
"Olive branch". A shred of integrity, and you'd drop your shit.
Greta's parents are "monsters". Proudboys are scallywags... You're a salesman.
- Sep 21, 2009
- 18,238
- 16,702
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Trump is controlled by Clinton? Far out. How deep is the deep state?
- Banned
- #1,154
DYOR.
It's not hard to find.
But don't you reckon it's weird that you claim to have an opinion on this but don't actually know the relevant law?
Maybe you should come to grips with the basic facts before claiming to have a clue?
- Banned
- #1,155
Did you cut and paste this from Quora?
Les Malone
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jul 28, 2019
- 5,752
- 6,282
- AFL Club
- GWS
Looks like Fat boy Jerry is lowering the standard of impeachment even more now, the hypocrisy is pretty amusing.
I wonder if Jerry ever flew on lolita express with Billy boy, plenty of opportunity for Bills escapades to be used against him to the detriment of the country.
Last edited:
- Banned
- #1,157
Remind me, what was Clinton impeached for?
- Banned
- #1,158
That was least concerning issue of my post. That you need to put two and two together but you're right, not concrete. The impeachment part is solid. Dems are guilty of doing what they are suggesting trump did. Trump has nothing to answer for, DOJ already ticked it off.Cheers, but as mentioned I don't think that qualifies. Biden's son wasn't even the target of the investigation;
Fact check: What Trump has been getting wrong on Biden and Ukraine
President Donald Trump is facing intense criticism over a July phone call during which, according to a person familiar with the matter, he pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate the son of former Vice President Joe Biden, a leading candidate to face him in the 2020...edition.cnn.com
Look 'Jesus' it's pretty clear you don't know what you're talking about. It's abundantly clear you've heard some talking head on CNN or maybe read a WaPo article that said Trump has done something "illegal" yet you're sitting here unwilling to give me the name of the legislation and section that he has allegdly broken.
I'm under no obligation to do my own research because i'm not doing something stupid like saying the President has broken the law. That's your claim, or more acurately the claim of some MSM hack that you're parroting like a dutiful NPC, not mine.
Please provide the relevant statute number and provision and I will review.
- Jul 13, 2015
- 38,660
- 43,818
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Lying to Congress.
- Banned
- #1,161
So basically you don't even know what law Trump has broken but you're pretty confident he didn't break it?
Go educate yourself.
- Banned
- #1,162
- Banned
- #1,163
I don't care about Biden. Least important part of the story. The important part is the impeachment inquiry and how the democrats are guilty of what they are accusing trump of. Biden is less interesting because all politicians do that. They are all guilty of lining their own pockets. Most grease industries wheels and push policies to help companies. Then leave with nice part time jobs will millions in the bank.
ChappyUK
Cancelled
30k Posts
10k Posts
BeanCoiNFT Investor
Song Contest Winner - 5+ Rounds
Podcaster
Pokemon is Life
Pantskyle
So Trump just released something he didn't have to release to frame himself.
Sounds legit.
At least you're not calling it a Mafia hit like nutjob Shifty.
FireKrakouer
This aggression will not stand, man.
- Jul 5, 2011
- 16,041
- 24,517
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
That was classic - and I did it many times!
Sorry that you were the victim of my mischief in that case. But man... even many on your own "side" are calling you out, telling you to chill, questioning your "state all opinion as fact" style...
You were entirely convinced that Don Jr committed obvious collusion, and nothing came of it. You spent months on that obsession. Have you considered that maybe you've got this one wrong too? There are dozens of opinions here, but you are the most extreme of all. Does that tell you something?
Hopefully a sensible Dem gets up in 2020, but the impeachment/prison wet dreams over Trump... shit, even if he WAS guilty of a serious crime, we all know that rich and powerful people don't face justice in the US. Focus on policy, not fantasy.
In the US and UK right now we have unelectable far left wing mess opposition parties running fierce opposition against democracy. In the UK they want the deep state to tear down an elected president and in the UK they are desperately maneuvering to avoid a general election!
Last edited:
- Banned
- #1,167
Republican senator and Trump cabana boy Lindsey Graham is in favour of impeachment. Listen to him explain why it's important to "cleanse the office" and how you don't even need to be convicted of a crime for a president to be replaced.
Oh wait. That was in 1999. Now Trump is president, he doesn't believe any of that. Fancy that.
Oh wait. That was in 1999. Now Trump is president, he doesn't believe any of that. Fancy that.
Last edited:
- Sep 21, 2009
- 18,238
- 16,702
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Yeah... because they have standards. And they have respect for him as a poster.
Luckily you don't have that burden...
- Dec 18, 2007
- 11,029
- 6,863
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Non that play Essendon
Interns and cigars could be serious.
The Republicans spent years investigation Bill Clinton.
- Banned
- #1,170
Because you struggle to string together a coherent sentence on your own?
Yeah, I noticed that.
He did. And you admitted as much.
But collusion isn't a crime and the bar for proving "criminal conspiracy" is high.
But you wouldn't have a handle on any of that. Basically your understanding is limited to whatever you can read and regurgitate in 30 seconds. Or cut and paste from Quora.
- Banned
- #1,171
So how high was the bar for impeachment in that case?
- Banned
- #1,172
So when Boris Johnson illegally suspended parliament that was "democratic"?
- Jul 13, 2015
- 38,660
- 43,818
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Does it matter?
Thst said, a boss having sex with an intern in their office would be a huge harrassment lawsuit.
Lying about it under oath makes it even worse.
- Banned
- #1,174
Is that meant to be a rebuttal?
- Banned
- #1,175
Just establishing what people might consider a reasonable bar for impeachment.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
