Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 9 - The Shi'ites Hit The Fan (Cont. in Part 10, see OP)

[CM86]

Does it matter?

Thst said, a boss having sex with an intern in their office would be a huge harrassment lawsuit.

Lying about it under oath makes it even worse.

Should've just grabbed her by the pussy.

Women are begging for it, apparently.
Teenage beauty pageant competitors are nothing more than pieces of meat. And should be treated as such in the change rooms... apparently.

 

[Balls In]

Republican senator and Trump cabana boy Lindsey Graham is in favour of impeachment. Listen to him explain why it's important to "cleanse the office" and how you don't even need to be convicted of a crime for a president to be replaced.




Oh wait. That was in 1999. Now Trump is president, he doesn't believe any of that. Fancy that.

Yes that was in 1999, well before Trump. I assume you have a point?

So when Boris Johnson illegally suspended parliament that was "democratic"?

Just a bit naughty but if its a big deal labour can fix it by giving people a vote which they wont for some strange reason?

 

[bourbons]

By all means identify these holes.

It's not "my take" to say it is illegal to solicit aid from a foreign principal.

No thanks lol. There's a post of mine a few pages back re: the way team Trump will frame things, that'll do me. Probably a litany of mitigation people smarter than me would argue in a court of law or official hearing of some kind.

 

[Gough]

The way it will end up being spun is Clinton was impeached and he stayed in office. An undeniable fact.

 

[bourbons]

No he wasn’t. He was paid to do everything in his power to find anything they could use as evidence to get Trump. He failed and his report reflected his disappointment at failing.

That you blokes honestly believe Bob ****ing Mueller is a partisan stooge after the report he produced and the actions he took (or didn't)... like, holy ****

Champagne comedy

 

[bourbons]

...Free rein to drain the swamp completely.
...

My bad, I went early. This is champagne comedy

 

[Chief]

That you blokes honestly believe Bob ****ing Mueller is a partisan stooge after the report he produced and the actions he took (or didn't)... like, holy ****

Champagne comedy

If Trump says it, they believe it.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Yes that was in 1999, well before Trump. I assume you have a point?

Did Graham's principled arguments evaporate when Trump got elected?

Just a bit naughty but if its a big deal labour can fix it by giving people a vote which they wont for some strange reason?

You complain about the other side being "undemocratic" but illegally suspending parliament is fair game.

I assume you are aware of the hypocrisy but don't care?

 

[Financialpanther]

My bad, I went early. This is champagne comedy

 

[Sweet Jesus]

No thanks lol. There's a post of mine a few pages back re: the way team Trump will frame things, that'll do me. Probably a litany of mitigation people smarter than me would argue in a court of law or official hearing of some kind.

Compelling stuff.

 

[Balls In]

You complain about the other side being "undemocratic" but illegally suspending parliament is fair game.

I assume you are aware of the hypocrisy but don't care?

Labour is fighting tooth and nail to avoid enacting the results of an election. Why wont they support a general election, the ultimate determination in a democracy?

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Will FireKraquora return soon for his evening fan dance?

To perform his hilarous Etch-a-Sketch impression of someone who has something to say.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Labour is fighting tooth and nail to avoid enacting the results of an election. Why wont they support a general election, the ultimate determination in a democracy?

It's a political calculation obviously. Although there was an election in 2017, so what is the obligation to hold another one?

None of that mitigates your weird support for someone who illegally suspended parliament while you complain about others being "undemocratic".

Do you admit you are a hypocrite?

 

[FireKrakouer]

Will FireKraquora return soon for his evening fan dance?

To perform his hilarous Etch-a-Sketch impression of someone who has something to say.

Yo? Ask me anything bro, I'll give an honest answer. I am now an unbiased centrist.

Will Drumpf get impeached, or even sent to prison post-office? Nah, the US don't work that way.

If the Dems produce a candidate that won't initiate any new wars as president, I'll support them over Trump.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Yo? Ask me anything bro, I'll give an honest answer.

Honest in the sense that it occurred to you 30 seconds ago and you never bothered to consider the implications or whether it's accurate?

Wow, such principle!

What will appear on the Etch-a-Sketch next?

 

[EasternTiger]

Fair to say Sweet Jesus is in a heightened state.

If you were playing the drinking game every time he says 'asking a foreign government to investigate a political rival is illegal' you would have been in hospital getting your stomach pumped 20 pages ago.

I just hope at some stage in the coming hours and days his carer checks his internet usage and pulls the plug.

The only thing that comes even remotely close to this psychotic break is the time Kidd Vicious legit thought the NAZIS were assembling on our shores.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Fair to say Sweet Jesus is in a heightened state.

I exist permanently in a heightened state. It's called being smarter than the rest of you.

It's also fair to say I'm right and the low-information, low-cognition muppets attempting to disagree don't know what day it is.

 

[ChappyUK]

That you blokes honestly believe Bob ****ing Mueller is a partisan stooge after the report he produced and the actions he took (or didn't)... like, holy ****

Champagne comedy

Mueller made it obviously clear that he was only the figurehead and had very little input the report.

No one is saying he is the partisan one.

 

[Leon]

Don't get me wrong, I'd love some mud to stick to Biden here. He's another Hillary - Republican Lite. He will achieve absolutely nothing for the US or the World. He'll just appear statesmanlike.

I’m only a part time reader of this thread, but am I correct in saying that you’re anti-Trump and not pro, yes?

The whole thing in 2016 about “Oh, but Hillary isn’t left enough” and “Oh, I don’t like Hillary either” amongst people who hated Trump were contributing factors that led to the whole disaster that is Trump’s presidency.

Hillary, and now Biden, even with their faults, are absolute light years better presidential candidates than Trump. Not even a contest.

If the Democrats can’t fully unite behind its candidate in 2020 without nitpicking over whether they’re squeaky clean, Trump can easily win again.

(Also, the above is just a general comment, not aimed at you specifically - I assume you’re just another Aussie commenting on Trump and US politics on here!)

 

[bourbons]

That was least concerning issue of my post. That you need to put two and two together but you're right, not concrete. The impeachment part is solid. Dems are guilty of doing what they are suggesting trump did. Trump has nothing to answer for, DOJ already ticked it off.

Ticked off what though? The "transcript" that was produced from the best recollection of people that may or not be loyal to Trump who were in the room a few months ago?

Like I said, really no point in speculating further until there's something more concrete, ideally from the whistleblower himself.

 

[Satan]

WASHINGTON — The intelligence officer who filed a whistle-blower complaint about President Trump’s interactions with the leader of Ukraine raised alarms not only about what the two men said in a phone call, but also about how the White House handled records of the conversation, according to two people briefed on the complaint.
The whistle-blower, moreover, identified multiple White House officials as witnesses to potential presidential misconduct who could corroborate the complaint, the people said — adding that the inspector general for the intelligence community, Michael Atkinson, interviewed witnesses.
Mr. Atkinson eventually concluded that there was reason to believe that the president might have illegally solicited a foreign campaign contribution — and that his potential misconduct created a national security risk, according to a newly disclosed Justice Department memo

Slightly concerning

 

[Groin guru]

I exist permanently in a heightened state. It's called being smarter than the rest of you.

We can all tell - I mean what's smarter than repeating the same line over and over and then refusing to touch anything that might require you to rub two brain cells together.

You disappeared after the Mueller farce. Pop back as soon as this started yesterday. You're basically a bandwagon never trumper

 

[shniko11]

 

[ChappyUK]

Ticked off what though? The "transcript" that was produced from the best recollection of people that may or not be loyal to Trump who were in the room a few months ago?

Like I said, really no point in speculating further until there's something more concrete, ideally from the whistleblower himself.

What will they have that is more concrete? It will also be just be a recollection.

From all accounts all transcripts are done this way.

 

[Groin guru]

Ticked off what though? The "transcript" that was produced from the best recollection of people that may or not be loyal to Trump who were in the room a few months ago?

Like I said, really no point in speculating further until there's something more concrete, ideally from the whistleblower himself.

It was ticked off in July. When the Inspector General referred this to the DOJ. The only part that is old is the part of it being brought to our attention 2 months later. DOJ:
"all relevant components of the department agreed with this legal conclusion: that there was NO violation"

The same whistleblower that the Inspector General declared as having "some sign of an arguable political bias in favour of a rival political candidate". So the "whistleblower" had a bias against Trump. So again we don't see collusion on the part of Trump but the intelligence community and the Democrats AGAIN (like they were doing in 2016). So again, it's not a trump scandal but another democrat scandal to try and remove Trump from office.